Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

17?  Half the residents of that state were parents at 17.

yes but the baby daddy/baby mama might have been under 24 in a lot of those cases.

Posted
41 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:

Looked it up:

https://www.kevinkuliklaw.com/what-is-unlawful-sexual-activity-with-a-minor/
 

It’s consensual sex between someone 24 or older with someone 16 or 17. 

One weird thing about those laws is that a relationship can be legal for a whole year, until the older one turns 24 and bam suddenly it becomes illegal for a day until the younger one turns 18 then it's legal again.

 

If they're going to have these laws it would make mathematical sense to have it be a sliding scale based on relative age difference counting their ages in total days, not your arbitrary age in calendar years where the "age" difference changes from one day to the next because of when birthdays fall.  Kind of like the supposedly acceptable dating age difference of taking half the age of the older one and adding 7, so the supposedly acceptable partner for a 24 year old is 19+ years old, except you calculate it in days.

Posted
13 minutes ago, 1ManRaid said:

One weird thing about those laws is that a relationship can be legal for a whole year, until the older one turns 24 and bam suddenly it becomes illegal for a day until the younger one turns 18 then it's legal again.

 

If they're going to have these laws it would make mathematical sense to have it be a sliding scale based on relative age difference counting their ages in total days, not your arbitrary age in calendar years where the "age" difference changes from one day to the next because of when birthdays fall.  Kind of like the supposedly acceptable dating age difference of taking half the age of the older one and adding 7, so the supposedly acceptable partner for a 24 year old is 19+ years old, except you calculate it in days.

 

 

Asking for a friend? 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 6
Posted
54 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

17?  Half the residents of that state were parents at 17.

True, but that’s because half the residents of this state were 17 before birth control.

Posted

Just in... Florida man...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

Such is only unlawful with "certain minors"??

 

wtf

if they have worked for 12 or more hours in the mine it is unlawful because they are so tired.

Posted
3 hours ago, 1ManRaid said:

One weird thing about those laws is that a relationship can be legal for a whole year, until the older one turns 24 and bam suddenly it becomes illegal for a day until the younger one turns 18 then it's legal again.

 

If they're going to have these laws it would make mathematical sense to have it be a sliding scale based on relative age difference counting their ages in total days, not your arbitrary age in calendar years where the "age" difference changes from one day to the next because of when birthdays fall.  Kind of like the supposedly acceptable dating age difference of taking half the age of the older one and adding 7, so the supposedly acceptable partner for a 24 year old is 19+ years old, except you calculate it in days.


An odd law for sure.  It seems like a 23 year old having sex with a 16 year old should be illegal.  It’s not in Florida, but it should be.  I mean we’re talking about someone who age-wise should have graduated college and a high school sophomore or junior.  That’s pretty messed up.

×
×
  • Create New...