leh-nerd skin-erd Posted February 16, 2022 Share Posted February 16, 2022 1 hour ago, Chef Jim said: Cynthia Muffins Fair Caught Serving Caviar with Silver Spoon. - Geoffrey ‘Biff’ Bifferella Chief Editor - Society Pages Variety Backstroke lover Always hidin tween the covers Til I talked to a daddy, he say ”You ain’t seen nothing til you’re down on C Muffins Then you’re sure to be a changin ways…” -Steven Tyler, circa 1978, on the original lyrics to Walk This Way. Holy crap, it was originally a love song. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blitz Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 Yep. They're guilty. Irony here is he's describing the 50 people that watch his show. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 So, with the Danchenko indictment, the public now knows that a Clinton crony in the person of Dolan fed Danchenko false information that Danchenko then presented to Steele as intel. Steele then regurgitated Danchenko’s claims in the Clinton campaign-funded dossier the former MI6 agent provided the FBI. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 7 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Yep. They're guilty. Irony here is he's describing the 50 people that watch his show. What’s hilarious is that people would look to a late night comedian for their news updates. Does Kimmel have a news staff? How the heck does he know ANYTHING about what’s going on in this investigation? I’m not saying he’s right or wrong but he has literally ZERO information or sources on this subject. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 13 hours ago, BillsFanNC said: @Backintheday544 and had this conversation the other day. I can understand Clinton seeking favorable coverage of her messaging, and steering clear of any sort of deep analysis into the actual filing, but going all in with Vanity Fair was almost unbelievably weak. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said: What’s hilarious is that people would look to a late night comedian for their news updates. Does Kimmel have a news staff? How the heck does he know ANYTHING about what’s going on in this investigation? I’m not saying he’s right or wrong but he has literally ZERO information or sources on this subject. He's an idiot who made his fame by showing girls bouncing on trampolines. He doesn't care/need to know more than what CNN feeds his empty skull. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 John Durham, Almost the Media's Invisible Man Townhall, by Tim Graham No one can ever claim that the notion of Trump-Russia collusion and the Mueller investigation were downplayed or ignored by the press. It was the opposite. The story was enormous and incessant.Rich Noyes of the Media Research Center found that from Jan. 20, 2017, through July 20, 2019, the evening newscasts at ABC, CBS and NBC alone devoted an astounding 2,634 minutes to the Trump-Russia narrative.On Feb. 12, the conservative media reported a "bombshell." Well, the term "bombshell" is almost copyrighted as a journalism term for "Republican scandal deepener." https://townhall.com/columnists/timgraham/2022/02/16/john-durham-almost-the-medias-invisible-man-n2603339 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 17, 2022 Share Posted February 17, 2022 (edited) Edited February 17, 2022 by BillsFanNC 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillStime Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 👆idiots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 (edited) Everyone has actually read the Durham filing, right? Especially the lefties, right? Let's examine this portion. Quote The Government’s evidence at trial will also establish that among the Internet data Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited was domain name system (“DNS”) Internet traffic pertaining to (i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building, and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (“EOP”). (Tech Executive-1’s employer, Internet Company-1, had come to access and maintain dedicated servers for the EOP as part of a sensitive arrangement whereby it provided DNS resolution services to the EOP. Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP’s DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.) 1. Among. Durham states that the DNS data he cites in the filing is AMONG the exploited data. In other words Durham has more. 2. Data was mined from a "particular healthcare provider" as well. Interesting. 3. Nobody disputes that this contractor provided this service back to the Obama Era. What Durham is saying is that this arrangement was exploited to mine the data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Trump. Somehow I dont think that part was in the contract. So unless Durham also has discovered that during the Obama administration a Tech executive: 1. Mined the data and passed it along to an RNC lawyer being paid by the Trump campaign. 2. The RNC lawyer then went to the FBI as a "concerned citizen" with the derogatory information and didn't divulge his relationship with the Trump campaign when asked. Lying to the FBI. 3. All in an effort to to further a false, made up story meant to damage Obama. If Durham has information that Trump and his lawyers/ campaign did the above then I'd want Durham to go after them too. I think most of us want all this crap out of politics no matter which "side" does it. It's called having principles. Edited February 18, 2022 by BillsFanNC 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanNC Posted February 18, 2022 Share Posted February 18, 2022 Byron York takes us down memory hole lane.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 19, 2022 Share Posted February 19, 2022 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 20, 2022 Share Posted February 20, 2022 Michael Sussmann’s Lawyers: It’s OK If He Lied To The FBI by Margot Cleveland https://thefederalist.com/2022/02/18/michael-sussmanns-lawyers-its-ok-if-he-lied-to-the-fbi/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted February 20, 2022 Share Posted February 20, 2022 2 hours ago, B-Man said: Michael Sussmann’s Lawyers: It’s OK If He Lied To The FBI by Margot Cleveland https://thefederalist.com/2022/02/18/michael-sussmanns-lawyers-its-ok-if-he-lied-to-the-fbi/ bull#### the lie wasn't "material." And if you believe it wasn't, then Trump's call to Zelenskyy was wholly appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 20, 2022 Share Posted February 20, 2022 Six Things Clarified By The Durham Probe https://thebluestateconservative.com/2022/02/20/six-things-clarified-by-the-durham-probe/ . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 21, 2022 Share Posted February 21, 2022 Perhaps in honor of the dubious holiday today, the New York Post runs an unusual editorial under the heading “The absurd ‘Russiagate’ Pulitzer of the NY Times and Washington Post.” Beginning with the Pulitzer board’s bloviation in honor of the winners, the editorial reviews the 20 award-winning stories. The editors preface their review: [R]eading these pieces four years later, one is struck not only by how irrelevant they are, but how shlocky — tinged with a McCarthyist alarmism of a red under every bed. Two major newspapers that hold themselves up as the pinnacle of press freedom, the “truth dies in darkness” brigade and all that, pushed a conspiracy theory. As a lesson in mass delusion, it’s worth going through the 20 stories that make up the Post and the Times’ award-winning series to show just how damaging they were: to the truth, to the newspapers’ reputations — and to America itself. The editorial concludes with a modest if unrealistic proposal: Of course, the Mueller report, released in 2019, blew it all away. After a full investigation, there was no “collusion.” All the smoke and mirrors used by the Times and Post and their anonymous briefers to turn ambassador meetings into Kremlin plots add up to nothing. Yet the damage had been done. Read the whole thing here. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/02/look-back-in-anger-3.php 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 21, 2022 Share Posted February 21, 2022 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 23, 2022 Share Posted February 23, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts