Dear #DeepState Coup Catchers Durham and Barr

[Irv]

Hillary should be arrested, tried, and executed.  What a mess.  

[Doc]

Worse than Watergate, 9/11, WWII and January 6th combined.  

[Chef Jim]

1 minute ago, Doc said:

Worse than Watergate, 9/11, WWII and January 6th combined.  

How dare you compare this to January 6th!   
 

😡😡😡

[BillsFanNC]

In other words, a Clinton supporting contractor (Joffe) obtained sensitive information (perhaps unlawfully) about the Office of the President of the United States (Trump), manipulated the information, passed it to a DNC/Clinton lawyer (Sussmann), who then delivered it to the CIA.

All on American soil.

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

[All_Pro_Bills]

1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

How long before the narrative "Durham is a Russian asset" gets cued up in the MSM?  What's so very scary about establishment media operatives is that they're so, so predictable.  

 

Otherwise he needs to be careful as people with dirt on the Clinton's have a 573% higher than average probability of committing suicide. 

[Big Blitz]

 

[BillStime]

Hysterical - someone is triggered and disappointed today...

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

[Westside]

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Check out the reply’s. How the hell can people be that brainwashed. The liberal democrat is worse than a cult. She is going to be the next target for the democratic cartel to go after.
 

How anyone thinks that clinton is above spying must be living in a cave.

 

The democratic party is the most corrupt party ever!  Not even close! 

[Backintheday544]

8 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

In other words, a Clinton supporting contractor (Joffe) obtained sensitive information (perhaps unlawfully) about the Office of the President of the United States (Trump), manipulated the information, passed it to a DNC/Clinton lawyer (Sussmann), who then delivered it to the CIA.

All on American soil.

 

 

In other other words:

Strangely, there wasn’t a lot of fact-checking going on down at Mar-a-Lago, but the actual reason that the “LameStream” media hadn’t covered the story was likely because, as the Times notes: (1) Sussmann’s conversation with the CIA had already been reported last October (2) Durham never once said anything about the White House being “infiltrate[d]” (3) the special counsel also never claimed the Clinton campaign had paid Joffe’s company and (4) perhaps most importantly, “the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era.” In fact, lawyers for the data scientist who helped develop the data analysis in question, say this happened during— wait for it—Barack Obama’s presidency.

 

What Trump and some news outlets are saying is wrong,” attorneys Jody Westby and Mark Rasch told the Times. “The cybersecurity researchers were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign, and to our knowledge all of the data they used was nonprivate DNS data from before Trump took office.”

In other words, Trump and company got the whole thing hilariously, mortifyingly incorrect. But fear not: We’re sure they’ll issue a lengthy correction and heartfelt apology to the people whose reputations they impugned—and the ones Trump suggested should be put to death—in no time.“

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/02/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-white-house-spying

 

Will we get a defamation letter suit or will Fox hide behind that they’re an entertainment company and not a news company protect them again?

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

1 hour ago, Backintheday544 said:

In other other words:

Strangely, there wasn’t a lot of fact-checking going on down at Mar-a-Lago, but the actual reason that the “LameStream” media hadn’t covered the story was likely because, as the Times notes: (1) Sussmann’s conversation with the CIA had already been reported last October (2) Durham never once said anything about the White House being “infiltrate[d]” (3) the special counsel also never claimed the Clinton campaign had paid Joffe’s company and (4) perhaps most importantly, “the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era.” In fact, lawyers for the data scientist who helped develop the data analysis in question, say this happened during— wait for it—Barack Obama’s presidency.

 

What Trump and some news outlets are saying is wrong,” attorneys Jody Westby and Mark Rasch told the Times. “The cybersecurity researchers were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign, and to our knowledge all of the data they used was nonprivate DNS data from before Trump took office.”

In other words, Trump and company got the whole thing hilariously, mortifyingly incorrect. But fear not: We’re sure they’ll issue a lengthy correction and heartfelt apology to the people whose reputations they impugned—and the ones Trump suggested should be put to death—in no time.“

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/02/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-white-house-spying

 

Will we get a defamation letter suit or will Fox hide behind that they’re an entertainment company and not a news company protect them again?

I get the appeal of a Vanity Fair expose….hard hitting infotainment, the latest trends and styles out of Hollywood, and a very strong online bra and panty offering.  At the same time—and I’m not knocking you here, this is about sourcing—I don’t trust a damn thing until it’s picked up by Entertainment Tonight.  
 

 

[Chef Jim]

9 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I get the appeal of a Vanity Fair expose….hard hitting infotainment, the latest trends and styles out of Hollywood, and a very strong online bra and panty offering.  At the same time—and I’m not knocking you here, this is about sourcing—I don’t trust a damn thing until it’s picked up by Entertainment Tonight.  
 

 

If you’re looking for hard hitting Hollywood political journalism you gotta read Variety. 

[Backintheday544]

6 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I get the appeal of a Vanity Fair expose….hard hitting infotainment, the latest trends and styles out of Hollywood, and a very strong online bra and panty offering.  At the same time—and I’m not knocking you here, this is about sourcing—I don’t trust a damn thing until it’s picked up by Entertainment Tonight.  
 

 

It’s quoting the Times.

 

The main gist from the Times:

 

Times notes:

- (1) Sussmann’s conversation with the CIA had already been reported last October

-(2) Durham never once said anything about the White House being “infiltrate[d]”

-(3) the special counsel also never claimed the Clinton campaign had paid Joffe’s company and

-(4) perhaps most importantly, “the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era.” In fact, lawyers for the data scientist who helped develop the data analysis in question, say this happened during— wait for it—Barack Obama’s presidency.

 

Here’s the Times piece: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

 

And Vanity Fair is much more legit than 99 percent of Bonnie’s spam.

[BillsFanNC]

Ohhh the Times! Well now that's different. I mean they have such a stellar journalistic record with this story after all. 

 

Long thread of actual journalism warning.

 

 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

1 hour ago, Backintheday544 said:

It’s quoting the Times.

 

The main gist from the Times:

 

Times notes:

- (1) Sussmann’s conversation with the CIA had already been reported last October

-(2) Durham never once said anything about the White House being “infiltrate[d]”

-(3) the special counsel also never claimed the Clinton campaign had paid Joffe’s company and

-(4) perhaps most importantly, “the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era.” In fact, lawyers for the data scientist who helped develop the data analysis in question, say this happened during— wait for it—Barack Obama’s presidency.

 

Here’s the Times piece: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/politics/durham-sussmann-trump-russia.html

 

And Vanity Fair is much more legit than 99 percent of Bonnie’s spam.

“A spicy story about another story is better than a factual recounting of the subject of the story.”

 

-Cynthia Muffins Fair

Publisher Emeritus 

Vanity Fair 
 

 

[B-Man]

 

“The Durham investigation makes clear that Hillary Clinton and the power elite spied on the Trump campaign and White House, undermining our democracy, launching us into a new Cold War, endangering America and the world. Clinton and her warmongers must be held accountable,” Gabbard tweeted on Tuesday

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

                                       

 

 

 

 

[Chef Jim]

7 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

“A spicy story about another story is better than a factual recounting of the subject of the story.”

 

-Cynthia Muffins Fair

Publisher Emeritus 

Vanity Fair 
 

 

Cynthia Muffins Fair Caught Serving Caviar with Silver Spoon. 
  - Geoffrey ‘Biff’ Bifferella

Chief Editor - Society Pages

Variety

[BillsFanNC]