B-Man Posted October 16, 2022 Posted October 16, 2022 Explosive Truth About FBI Has Been Revealed in Durham Trial… They’re Not Acting Alone in This Coup by Michael Flynn https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/10/gen-flynn-explosive-truth-fbi-revealed-durham-trial-not-acting-alone-coup/ . 1 1
Brueggs Posted October 16, 2022 Posted October 16, 2022 17 hours ago, BillStime said: What was fake? Did you read it? Or just relying on your keepers? And what success has Durham had in discrediting it? Unlike yourself, I don't have keepers. When the actual author of the document claims he cannot substantiate the contents, doesn't that make the contents a moot point? The fact that the DNC paid for it doesn't concern you? The fact that a federal law enforcement agency offered him 7 figures to corroborate his claims doesn't concern you? The fact that the author did not collect the 7 figures because he couldn't substantiate any of it doesn't concern you? The fact that the FBI knowingly used an unverified document to spy on US citizens doesn't concern you? Ask yourself, what part is real? Where is the proof? How is it possible that given all of this, you still have no skepticism? It can only be that you have bought into all of the nonsense, hook line and sinker, and to believe anything else would expose your entire belief system as a lie? Or, your get paid to spread propaganda? 1
Brueggs Posted October 16, 2022 Posted October 16, 2022 17 hours ago, BillStime said: Meanwhile - Steele wouldn’t take $1m to out his sources? That is your perspective? Your mind must be wrestling with what it wants to believe and what is actually happening. Steele isn't a journalist protecting a source. He provided a document that the FBI used to obtain FISA warrants to spy on US citizens and target a political candidate. You don't get the luxury of protecting your sources for those crimes.
BillsFanNC Posted October 16, 2022 Posted October 16, 2022 31 minutes ago, Brueggs said: Unlike yourself, I don't have keepers. When the actual author of the document claims he cannot substantiate the contents, doesn't that make the contents a moot point? The fact that the DNC paid for it doesn't concern you? The fact that a federal law enforcement agency offered him 7 figures to corroborate his claims doesn't concern you? The fact that the author did not collect the 7 figures because he couldn't substantiate any of it doesn't concern you? The fact that the FBI knowingly used an unverified document to spy on US citizens doesn't concern you? Ask yourself, what part is real? Where is the proof? How is it possible that given all of this, you still have no skepticism? It can only be that you have bought into all of the nonsense, hook line and sinker, and to believe anything else would expose your entire belief system as a lie? Or, your get paid to spread propaganda? None of this concerns him/her and the only answer he/she gets when he/she asks him/her self questions is Trump bad. 2
BillStime Posted October 16, 2022 Posted October 16, 2022 1 hour ago, Brueggs said: Unlike yourself, I don't have keepers. When the actual author of the document claims he cannot substantiate the contents, doesn't that make the contents a moot point? The fact that the DNC paid for it doesn't concern you? The fact that a federal law enforcement agency offered him 7 figures to corroborate his claims doesn't concern you? The fact that the author did not collect the 7 figures because he couldn't substantiate any of it doesn't concern you? The fact that the FBI knowingly used an unverified document to spy on US citizens doesn't concern you? Ask yourself, what part is real? Where is the proof? How is it possible that given all of this, you still have no skepticism? It can only be that you have bought into all of the nonsense, hook line and sinker, and to believe anything else would expose your entire belief system as a lie? Or, your get paid to spread propaganda? Um - your friends in the Republican Party initially paid for the research before Hillary picked it up and why are you afraid to read it? Much of it WAS verified… idiots
Brueggs Posted October 16, 2022 Posted October 16, 2022 Who said I was Republican, or didn't read it? Your bias makes you unable to process information sufficiently and makes you extremely predictable. What parts were verified?
B-Man Posted October 16, 2022 Posted October 16, 2022 4 minutes ago, Brueggs said: Who said I was Republican, or didn't read it? Your bias makes you unable to process information sufficiently and makes you extremely predictable. What parts were verified? Thank you for responding without quoting. Those of us who try to ignore Billsy's repetitious posts appreciate that. .
BillStime Posted October 16, 2022 Posted October 16, 2022 24 minutes ago, Brueggs said: Who said I was Republican, or didn't read it? Your bias makes you unable to process information sufficiently and makes you extremely predictable. What parts were verified? lmao - god who do you sound like - lmao Well if you read it - and could process information sufficiently - lmao - you wouldn’t be so predictable in attacking me instead of proving me wrong. And I already highlighted what was true in the dossier and no on fought it. Go back to your safe place
Brueggs Posted October 16, 2022 Posted October 16, 2022 28 minutes ago, B-Man said: Thank you for responding without quoting. Those of us who try to ignore Billsy's repetitious posts appreciate that. . I didn't even realize I did that... The fact that you knew who I was responding to says it all about that character 😂 1 1
Tenhigh Posted October 16, 2022 Posted October 16, 2022 On 10/14/2022 at 7:07 PM, Orlando Tim said: I will state simply the pee tape, what evidence do you have that it is true? He knows it was real, he was there acting as the mop boy.
Doc Posted October 16, 2022 Posted October 16, 2022 5 hours ago, Brueggs said: Unlike yourself, I don't have keepers. When the actual author of the document claims he cannot substantiate the contents, doesn't that make the contents a moot point? The fact that the DNC paid for it doesn't concern you? The fact that a federal law enforcement agency offered him 7 figures to corroborate his claims doesn't concern you? The fact that the author did not collect the 7 figures because he couldn't substantiate any of it doesn't concern you? The fact that the FBI knowingly used an unverified document to spy on US citizens doesn't concern you? Ask yourself, what part is real? Where is the proof? How is it possible that given all of this, you still have no skepticism? It can only be that you have bought into all of the nonsense, hook line and sinker, and to believe anything else would expose your entire belief system as a lie? Or, your get paid to spread propaganda? She doesn't care. All she wants to know is that it's true in her mind and that's all that matters.
Brueggs Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 20 hours ago, Doc said: She doesn't care. All she wants to know is that it's true in her mind and that's all that matters. Definitely a glitch going on over there. The mind is a powerful thing...
The Frankish Reich Posted October 18, 2022 Posted October 18, 2022 On 10/17/2022 at 11:53 AM, BillsFanNC said: Well, that whole Durham thing was a big never mind. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2022/10/18/us/politics/igor-danchenko-russia-acquittal-trump.amp.html I’m starting to think that maybe Trump won’t be “reinstated” as President after all. 1
BillStime Posted October 18, 2022 Posted October 18, 2022 Durham had one job. Discredit the Russian “hoax” The guy failed BTW - Durham’s job was always a hoax. It was just something for Donald Trump and Carter Page to fundraise off…
BillStime Posted October 19, 2022 Posted October 19, 2022 On 2/12/2022 at 10:52 PM, BillsFanNC said: 👆🤡 Your masters adore your ignorance, precious Durham is coming alright lolz
Recommended Posts