Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, BillStime said:

 

lol ok!  

 

You should look into the dossier and report back. I'm ready to respond with what has been verified when you share with us what was IN the dossier.

 

 

You obviously know that everything in the dossier is garbage so why don't we just move on?

  • Agree 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

You obviously know that everything in the dossier is garbage so why don't we just move on?

 

They either don't know or don't want to admit it.  It's how they keep the fantasy alive.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Doc said:

 

They either don't know or don't want to admit it.  It's how they keep the fantasy alive.

 

You are the biggest hypocrite out there bro... wanna see fantasy?

 

On 2/13/2022 at 9:56 AM, Doc said:

This is what will end up being worse than Watergate.

 

 

Posted

LMAO. someone is still referencing the fake Dossier created by an FBI informant that provided it to a campaign so they could use it to get a warrant to spy on the opposition party candidate? ?  The same one Sussman stated in his trial, that he told Mueller was false?

Seems like a silly thing to even bring up now.

  • Agree 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

What was fake in the dossier?

the one provided by a known FBI paid operative, to a known foreign State asset, for a known pollical campaign.  

 

Many still wonder how china got the list of US intelligence agents back in 2010.  

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-espionage/chinese-paper-applauds-anti-spy-efforts-after-ny-times-report-cia-sources-killed-idUSKBN18I059

 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

the one provided by a known FBI paid operative, to a known foreign State asset, for a known pollical campaign.  

 

Many still wonder how china got the list of US intelligence agents back in 2010.  

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-china-espionage/chinese-paper-applauds-anti-spy-efforts-after-ny-times-report-cia-sources-killed-idUSKBN18I059

 

 

 

 

What was fake in the dossier?

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

LMAO. someone is still referencing the fake Dossier created by an FBI informant that provided it to a campaign so they could use it to get a warrant to spy on the opposition party candidate? ?  The same one Sussman stated in his trial, that he told Mueller was false?

Seems like a silly thing to even bring up now.

 

That BSTime for you.  Silliness is her middle name.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Orlando Tim said:

I will state simply the pee tape, what evidence do you have that it is true?

Even the people who wrote it don’t believe that it’s true! But like Santa Claus, nobody’s going to tell BillSy otherwise.

Edited by SoCal Deek
Posted
2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Even the people who wrote it don’t believe that it’s true! But like Santa Claus, nobody’s going to tell BillSy otherwise.

 

Anything Trump bad = true.

 

There are plenty of verifiable things that paint Trump badly, but that's not enough for these morons.  Complete clowns.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BillsFanNC said:

 

Anything Trump bad = true.

 

There are plenty of verifiable things that paint Trump badly, but that's not enough for these morons.  Complete clowns.

 

So, that's all you got?  The Pee Tape allegedly isn't real?  You're telling us Trump doesn't have a history with such activities?  Hell, Michael Cohen even confirmed Trump is into that, um, stuff.

 

Isn't it crazy how many times Trump brings up the pee tape, unprompted, in public?  That's enough confirmation that even if a tape isn't real, the incident or something close to it, happened. 

 

You know what else is funny, DR?

 

Why hasn't DURHAM done anything to disprove the PEE TAPE?  

 

lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

And lastly, what exactly does Trump want in exchange for the docs he stole?

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
On 10/14/2022 at 1:27 PM, BillStime said:

 

What was fake in the dossier?

Lets see, Steele couldn't corroborate anything in the dossier, even with a $1,000,000 taxpayer funded incentive from our very own FBI.  What does that tell you?  I suppose its possible that the DNC gave him enough to fabricate it in the first place, but why not take the extra million when your neck deep already?

Posted
9 minutes ago, Brueggs said:

Lets see, Steele couldn't corroborate anything in the dossier, even with a $1,000,000 taxpayer funded incentive from our very own FBI.  What does that tell you?  I suppose its possible that the DNC gave him enough to fabricate it in the first place, but why not take the extra million when your neck deep already?


What was fake?  Did you read it?  Or just relying on your keepers?

 

And what success has Durham had in discrediting it?

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, BillStime said:


What was fake?  Did you read it?  Or just relying on your keepers?

 

And what success has Durham had in discrediting it?

 

 

10272016-clown.jpg

  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, Albwan said:

10272016-clown.jpg


So the cult that THRIVES on conspiracy can’t stomach another?

 

Funny no one can identify what is fake and Durham can’t seem to win or discredit anything in court. lolz

 

Meanwhile - Steele wouldn’t take $1m to out his sources?

Edited by BillStime
×
×
  • Create New...