GreggTX Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 Just saw this on NFL Network. Flucker would be a nice uqgrade at RG. I don't think we need Britt, but I'd love to see Fluckere in Bills blue for 2020. Thoughts?
YoloinOhio Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 Um so I read the title too fast and had to do a double take. It’s Fluker - no “c” 1 6
Sherlock Holmes Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said: Um so I read the title too fast and had to do a double take. It’s Fluker - no “c” Are you sure you don't remove remove the "L" instead? 1 5
thenorthremembers Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 Out of the two I'd much rather have Britt, that being said he is coming off a major knee injury. No thank you to both.
1ManRaid Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 Wow, a "Player exists, thoughts?" thread with more than one sentence in the original post. You outdid yourself. 3
YoloinOhio Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 If Seattle can’t use you on their “OL” (term used loosely) it might be time to explore other careers 4 1 1
eball Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 Cutting Fluker only saves the Hawks 3.7M...I wouldn't think they would do that for a good player who is only 29. 1
PIZ Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 Seahawks GM John Schneider was overheard saying “just release the Flucker”. 1 12
NewEra Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 (edited) I’m all about upgrading our OL. It really should be our biggest priority from here on out. It’s better than 2 years ago, but me playing on the line by myself blindfolded is better than our line 2 years ago. im just not sure how good Fluker and Britt are. 2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: If Seattle can’t use you on their “OL” (term used loosely) it might be time to explore other careers That’s what I was thinking Edited April 27, 2020 by NewEra
Rigotz Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 Heard his mom is a really tough lady ... you definitely don't want to mess with Mother Flucker 1 6 1
John from Riverside Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 Why are ppl trying to replace Jon F. For christ sake
Chandler#81 Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 12 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Um so I read the title too fast and had to do a double take. It’s Fluker - no “c” Gotta admit, I ‘read’ it wrong too, but Fluker wasn’t it..? Anyway, to the OP, PASS. 1
Freddie's Dead Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 With a name like Flucker's, it has to be good. 4
gobills404 Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 6 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: Why are ppl trying to replace Jon F. For christ sake Because he's very upgradeable? I don't know if Fluker would be any better but Feliciano isn't anything special. 1
John from Riverside Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, gobills404 said: Because he's very upgradeable? I don't know if Fluker would be any better but Feliciano isn't anything special. John F. is solid.....he has done NOTHING to give a reason of why he should be replaced. You know there is a chance that the position could get WORSE by replacing a player that didnt do anything wrong to lose his position. Replacing for the sake of replacing doesnt improve the position in itself. 1 1
Mark Vader Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 The only Seahawk I am interested in is Jadaveon Clowney.
Mc1320 Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 Fluker is a butcher.....Seattle’s O-Line has been one of the worst in the league and we will already have 39 O-lineman in camp. 1
Rockinon Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 We picked up 3 UDFA OLmen. Let them fight for a roster spot.
YoloinOhio Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 21 minutes ago, John from Riverside said: John F. is solid.....he has done NOTHING to give a reason of why he should be replaced. You know there is a chance that the position could get WORSE by replacing a player that didnt do anything wrong to lose his position. Replacing for the sake of replacing doesnt improve the position in itself. We really have 4 potential RGs who could be better then Fluker - Feleciano, D Williams Spencer long and Ford if he doesn’t play RT. Plus Bates can play G
John from Riverside Posted April 27, 2020 Posted April 27, 2020 Just now, YoloinOhio said: We really have 4 potential RGs who could be better then Fluker - Feleciano, D Williams Spencer long and Ford if he doesn’t play RT. Plus Bates can play G Agreed By the way folks in no way am I saying we have a pro bowl offensive line....I think they are "good" and yes we should always look to improve just not bring in players that are not as good to replace players that are better then they are. For instance....I really dont want to lose Spencer Long (we might anyway to a trade or something) but why you say? Because the guy has positon flexibility AND played well for us in relief. These guys are on low cost contracts......and they will now have another year of playing together. 2
Recommended Posts