Buffalo03 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) For me it's offensive line. I feel like this would be a huge waste this early. With our first pick we need someone that either scores touchdowns for us or stops the other team from scoring TDs and an offensive lineman does neither. Drafting oline this draft is not bad but not the way we should go with our first pick either, in my opinion Edited April 24, 2020 by Buffalo03 2
John from Riverside Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) Kicker Edited April 24, 2020 by John from Riverside 1 1 1
K-9 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 2 minutes ago, Limeaid said: Absolutely? Long Snapper. Like I’ve said before, we ignore long snapper at our own peril. 3
Aussie Joe Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 Originally I didn’t want them to take a Safety, but now I don’t really care who they take as long as it’s a decent player... Not keen on trading up with their 3rd or 4th though...
Saxum Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 1 minute ago, K-9 said: Like I’ve said before, we ignore long snapper at our own peril. We can ignore anything we want. The Bills should ignore long snapper unless they find a candidate who can long snap and play other roles. Entertaining by doing magic tricks does not count.
LABILLBACKER Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 K, P, LS, S, DT, OL Rooting for offense at 54 & 86 2
Locomark Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 DT, C, FB, QB, ILB, K, P ...actually anything else can be based on value. I prefer CB,EDGE,RB,WR,OLB, in no particular order. Just get the best player. Even a safety solely because I think they could go after a big nickel / safety / corner type such as Chinn or Winfield because they have position flexibility. 2
Adam727 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 CB. I think I am a lot higher on Wallace, Gaines, Taron than most. I think all of them are quality starters and would be disappointed to see one of them bumped off the roster. I’m hoping for a WR or edge but trust Beane and would be happy with any other position. 1
familykwi Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 With due respect to special teams players, my first thought was TE. Not that we're 100% set, but I don't even like the options at 54. If Niang, or Josh Jones was there at 54, I would have no problem taking either. FWIW, I love the idea of an early infusion of trench players annually, so maybe I'm jaded. I don't see OL as our top priority, but BPA needs to be taken seriously. if someone falls 1
Buddo Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 Ignoring the STs trio of Kicker, Punter and Long Snapper - I can't be serious about wanting/not wanting one of them with our 2nd round pick - I would have to say that I will trust Beane's judgement. We need another RB, and my instincts tell me that the value could well be way above anything else, by the time we pick, or even if we move up a (very) few spots. I'd also say that RB is the position where we will get a genuine contributor from day 1, with that pick. I'm not convinced that any other position will do the same. 1
Aussie Joe Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 11 minutes ago, Buddo said: Ignoring the STs trio of Kicker, Punter and Long Snapper - I can't be serious about wanting/not wanting one of them with our 2nd round pick - I would have to say that I will trust Beane's judgement. We need another RB, and my instincts tell me that the value could well be way above anything else, by the time we pick, or even if we move up a (very) few spots. I'd also say that RB is the position where we will get a genuine contributor from day 1, with that pick. I'm not convinced that any other position will do the same. Impossible to make this judgment now.. Need to see who is still available when they pick..
machine gun kelly Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 Basically any other position than RB, Edge Rusher, WR, CB. There should be one high on our board in one of those four positions, and follow the board as we go down the line. I’m fine with us bundling picks, or taking just BPA in the later rounds.
machine gun kelly Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 Oh and to be clear, that wasn’t in order, just whoever is highest on the board.
Buddo Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 28 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said: Impossible to make this judgment now.. Need to see who is still available when they pick.. Well, as it’s not a judgement, it’s eminently possible. Fwiw, even a later round RB has good chances of being a significant contributor, and there’s room for another right now, on the roster. Just about every other position, has guys ahead of whoever the pick might be, and most of them will take some unseating. I don’t see early contributors at other positions.
Recommended Posts