Thurman#1 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 9 hours ago, Buffalo716 said: 7-8 in the box is standard in the NFL 9 in the box is considered stacked 9 in the box happens around 20 - 30 times a season, mostly in goal-line stand type situations.
Thurman#1 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) 16 hours ago, maryland-bills-fan said: This is true. They brought in Gore for those "need one yard for a TD or 1st down" plays. Singletary ran a lot on 1st down, when the DE were wide to contain Allen and the defense had to defend against both pass and run. The coaches were good. You set up every play to get the max yardage and most of the time it works. But Singletary didn't have many plays were 3 yards got the first down, which would bring down his averge. Also, the Bills played very conservative when they had a lead and at the end of the season. If they were ahead in score and in a 3rd and 25, they would often run a safe running play with Singletary, rather than risk a pick-6 or an incomplete. So a 15 yard run padded Singletary's yards per carry, but didn't get a first down. The other team would concede the unsuccessful run for NO first down. The Bills would be okay with getting 15 more yard of field position before the punt and with taking a minute off the clock. I have never been a fan of "how good his yards per carry" is as a measure of how good he is. Total yards, for the primary runner is the metric there. He was #22 in that (#17 if you gave him his average for the 4 games he missed as injured). That is not good enough if you are going to use your RB as a weapon to beat other teams. It is okay if you just want to look good an flirt with the playoffs. Right, totally. Just to buttress your argument here, could you come up with, say four or five examples of the situation that you argue "often" happened ... where he got 15 yards to pad his stats but didn't get the first down? We'll wait. That's a ridiculous point. That may have happened one or two times but every team in the league pads the stats of their backs in that way when it's near the end of the game and they're ahead. But they also degrade the RB stats by running more than they pass late in the game which makes them much more predictable. (For ex, in the first quarter, KC passed 68% of the time, highest in the league, and in the 4th quarter 47%, 29th highest.) https://www.sharpfootballstats.com/situational-run-pass-ratios--off-.html Buffalo's YPA in the 4th quarter was 0.7 YPA lower than in the first quarter. Singletary's YPA didn't benefit from running late in the game. Yards per carry isn't just a good measure of an RB's performance, it's the best measure. Not perfect, but absolutely the best if you have to choose one measure. Arguably the single worst measure is total yards. It does mean something for the guys who got a ton of carries ... if you got a ton of carries and your YPA is still high, that's impressive. But for everyone else it means far far less than YPA. YPA correlates to effectiveness and effectiveness is what you want from a back. Edited April 24, 2020 by Thurman#1
Thurman#1 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) 7 hours ago, maryland-bills-fan said: They why did they use Gore and Allen in those goal line situations? The bills schemed around his limitations and made use of what he did well. First, they didn't always use Gore and Allen. Singletary had a very nice 2.5 yard TD run against Washington. As for why they used Allen, it's for several reasons, first because when he scrambles he can sometimes turn passes into running TDs, 2nd because running sneaks can be very effective at scoring if teams don't fill the middle with bodies and because forcing them to do so can create problems for them elsewhere. Like any quick-hitting play sneaks can surprise and be very effective, and RPO plays stress the defense knowing they have to defend both run and pass. As for why they used Gore, they seem to have a philosophical liking for big strong vertical backs in some situations. Plus it was very obvious that they absolutely loved Gore. That they "schemed around [Singletary's] weaknesses" is purely your assumption. They might as easily have been scheming around defensive tendencies, not to mention Allen's, the OL's and Gore's perceived strengths. Or simply playing to their own philosophies about heavy backs in certain situations. So far every year they've had at least one big pounding back on the roster even when their evasive back was by far their best. Was it because they were "scheming around Singletary's weaknesses] that they ran Allen for 8 TDs ... in 2018 when Singletary was still in college? Or is it just something that they like as a philosophy? No, you're right, it's probably that they were putting that idea in place as practice for when they drafted Singletary the next year. Edited April 24, 2020 by Thurman#1
Charles Romes Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 You can’t put 8 in the box against Allen. His arm is too strong.
GunnerBill Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 17 minutes ago, Charles Romes said: You can’t put 8 in the box against Allen. His arm is too strong. But he hasn't consistently hit deep despite that. If he can sharpen that up and it was a little better the last 5 or 6 games then it will force safeties out of the box and then Devin and whoever we draft in this draft will benefit from the same advantage as Patriots backs have for many years - light boxes. 2
Billy Claude Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 Are we really to the point where people believe that ESPN will go to the trouble of manipulating data just because they had a player pegged as a (let's say) a 5th rounder rather than a third round?
GunnerBill Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 50 minutes ago, Billy Claude said: Are we really to the point where people believe that ESPN will go to the trouble of manipulating data just because they had a player pegged as a (let's say) a 5th rounder rather than a third round? Apparently so.
Mango Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Billy Claude said: Are we really to the point where people believe that ESPN will go to the trouble of manipulating data just because they had a player pegged as a (let's say) a 5th rounder rather than a third round? Yeah, if anything I think in 2020 peoples memories are shorter. With Twitter, insta, etc. it’s about what do you think right now, nobody is screaming for consistency. I highly doubt that there is some guy at ESPN making sure that all of their stats line up with draft day prognostications 3 years down the road. Could you imagine the work that would take to do that on a scale of NFL rosters. The tin foil hat it takes to get to a place where you think ESPN is out to get your QB, RB, DE, etc. because of a draft day prediction is wild. Edited April 24, 2020 by Mango
ComradeKayAdams Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 12 hours ago, 32ABBA said: He is a superstar in waiting. Just give him the ball. Superstar? As in future first-team All-Pro? It's possible. Everything about him is potentially elite, with the sole exception of breakaway speed. Fortunately, Buffalo's offense won't have to rely on Singletary becoming elite. He just needs to do his job moving the chains, catching screens out of the backfield, and performing basic pass blocks. Daboll is building the offense around Allen and probably prefers a RB-by-committee approach. Add Carlos Hyde or his draft equivalent (Zack Moss?) as the power back, Yeldon as the third-down back, Jones as a special teams ace, DiMarco as whatever he does, and Wade as a wild-card. Not a bad group! 1
thebandit27 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 3 hours ago, Billy Claude said: Are we really to the point where people believe that ESPN will go to the trouble of manipulating data just because they had a player pegged as a (let's say) a 5th rounder rather than a third round? The most hilarious thing about it is that the numbers don’t come from ESPN; they come from the league website.
GunnerBill Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 47 minutes ago, Mango said: Yeah, if anything I think in 2020 peoples memories are shorter. With Twitter, insta, etc. it’s about what do you think right now, nobody is screaming for consistency. I highly doubt that there is some guy at ESPN making sure that all of their stats line up with draft day prognostications 3 years down the road. Could you imagine the work that would take to do that on a scale of NFL rosters. The tin foil hat it takes to get to a place where you think ESPN is out to get your QB, RB, DE, etc. because of a draft day prediction is wild. Who said anything about doing it across all NFL rosters? They just mark down the Bills players, mark up the Pats players and then call it a wrap and head to the bar. #TSWfacts 3 minutes ago, thebandit27 said: The most hilarious thing about it is that the numbers don’t come from ESPN; they come from the league website. Yea I was going to say right at the start I thought NextGen was an NFL think not an ESPN thing. 2
Buffalo716 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 8 hours ago, Thurman#1 said: 9 in the box happens around 20 - 30 times a season, mostly in goal-line stand type situations. 8-9 in the box is not uncommon in running Downs especially vs good RBs AP has faced 9 man boxes for tons of his career. They creep down both safeties for him. Seattle has played an 8-9 man box hybrid for years , it's always been why they've been so successful stopping the run . 9 may not be standard across all 32 teams but 9 come into the box for some teams a decent amount
GoBills808 Posted April 24, 2020 Author Posted April 24, 2020 4 hours ago, thebandit27 said: The most hilarious thing about it is that the numbers don’t come from ESPN; they come from the league website. Yes you are correct, the nextgen stats are from the NFL and not ESPN. I will edit the post
Doc Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 8 hours ago, Thurman#1 said: Right, totally. Just to buttress your argument here, could you come up with, say four or five examples of the situation that you argue "often" happened ... where he got 15 yards to pad his stats but didn't get the first down? We'll wait. That's a ridiculous point. That may have happened one or two times but every team in the league pads the stats of their backs in that way when it's near the end of the game and they're ahead. But they also degrade the RB stats by running more than they pass late in the game which makes them much more predictable. (For ex, in the first quarter, KC passed 68% of the time, highest in the league, and in the 4th quarter 47%, 29th highest.) https://www.sharpfootballstats.com/situational-run-pass-ratios--off-.html Buffalo's YPA in the 4th quarter was 0.7 YPA lower than in the first quarter. Singletary's YPA didn't benefit from running late in the game. Yards per carry isn't just a good measure of an RB's performance, it's the best measure. Not perfect, but absolutely the best if you have to choose one measure. Arguably the single worst measure is total yards. It does mean something for the guys who got a ton of carries ... if you got a ton of carries and your YPA is still high, that's impressive. But for everyone else it means far far less than YPA. YPA correlates to effectiveness and effectiveness is what you want from a back. I informed him of this before, but he either forgot it or conveniently ignored it. Last year Devin only carried the ball 5 times on 3rd and 10+ and gained 20 yards. That actually lowered his average, albeit slightly.
Thurman#1 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 Just now, Doc said: I informed him of this before, but he either forgot it or conveniently ignored it. Last year Devin only carried the ball 5 times on 3rd and 10+ and gained 20 yards. That actually lowered his average, albeit slightly. Heh heh. Interesting, Doc. And telling as well.
Thurman#1 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 13 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said: 8-9 in the box is not uncommon in running Downs especially vs good RBs AP has faced 9 man boxes for tons of his career. They creep down both safeties for him. Seattle has played an 8-9 man box hybrid for years , it's always been why they've been so successful stopping the run . 9 may not be standard across all 32 teams but 9 come into the box for some teams a decent amount 8 - 9, yeah. 9? It's very rare. That would leave only two guys to play outside/deep. Assuming only two receivers, it would still mean the CBs were on an island. And for safeties to be up closer is common these days, but actually in the box is really not. While it happens, it's mostly on goal line stands.
Doc Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 7 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said: Heh heh. Interesting, Doc. And telling as well. And mind you, his performance last year was with the 15th rated run blocking OL. 2 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said: 8 - 9, yeah. 9? It's very rare. That would leave only two guys to play outside/deep. Assuming only two receivers, it would still mean the CBs were on an island. And for safeties to be up closer is common these days, but actually in the box is really not. While it happens, it's mostly on goal line stands. Yup.
Buffalo716 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Thurman#1 said: 8 - 9, yeah. 9? It's very rare. That would leave only two guys to play outside/deep. Assuming only two receivers, it would still mean the CBs were on an island. And for safeties to be up closer is common these days, but actually in the box is really not. While it happens, it's mostly on goal line stands. There's no actual statistics to argue this, but I've been around the game my whole life and seen plenty of 9 man boxes outside of the goal line Is it standard no, but it's not as rare as you think especially with 12 personnel or 22 If you only have one or two wide receivers out, you are getting a super stacked box It not unheard of tho not normal. You get 3rd and inches and offense goes heavy... You can expect 9 in the box I'm not trying to argue it's a base defense or anything Edited April 24, 2020 by Buffalo716
thebandit27 Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Doc said: And mind you, his performance last year was with the 15th rated run blocking OL. Yup. Well, that line must’ve been pretty solid, because Singletary ranked 7th in the NFL in yards-before-contact-per-carry with 2.7.https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/rushing_advanced.htm Either that, or that’s another positive effect from him seeing very few 8-man boxes (#pernextgenbutnotgobills808) Edited April 24, 2020 by thebandit27 1
Doc Posted April 24, 2020 Posted April 24, 2020 2 minutes ago, thebandit27 said: Well, that line must’ve been pretty solid, because Singletary ranked 7th in the NFL in yards-before-contact-per-carry with 2.7.https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/rushing_advanced.htm Either that, or that’s another positive effect from him seeing very few 8-man boxes (#pernextgenbutnotgobills808) It was PFR's ranking. And according to this, while he faced a stacked front just 7.3% of the time, he averaged 5.8 YPC.
Recommended Posts