Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Just now, Doc said:

 

They wanted to move Diggs but they had to replace him.  They've got no other receiving threat opposite Thielen. 

I get that. Just seems like you would’ve tried everything you can do to make it work with the proven commodity if the plan is to backfill with what will likely be a lesser player. At least for 2020. But...I guess they tried and he wanted out. Our gain. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

They wanted to move Diggs but they had to replace him.  They've got no other receiving threat opposite Thielen. 

Now Thielen is expendable... send him our way!!!!:wub:

Edited by Sherlock Holmes
Posted
1 minute ago, whatdrought said:

 

People acting like Diggs is a pricey player... 

 

LOL!  Any rookie will be an "economic upgrade."  Real newsflash there, Willy.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, whatdrought said:

 

People acting like Diggs is a pricey player... 

and the fact that you don’t really know what kind of production you’ll get out of Jefferson

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Straight Hucklebuck said:

Based on what? 

Jefferson had huge production at an SEC school and better combine metrics.

 

 

Gimme someone who has done it in the Big time...

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, Coach Tuesday said:

So much cheap labor replacing expensive labor.  This draft has been more about cashflow and cap allocation than any other I can remember.  Wonder if owners are worrying about revenue declines.

 

Once upon a time, teams were criticised for letting high draft picks walk after their first contract and backfilling those holes with other high draft picks.    Now teams are lauded for it (unless they're the Bills).

 

Go figure...

  • Like (+1) 6
×
×
  • Create New...