Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Just now, billsfan714 said:

That is crazy to think about.

 

Not really.

 

It's a supply and demand thing.

 

Tons of receivers available, so why prioritize them?

 

Go after the positions that aren't as deep.

Posted

Thoughts so far....

 

1 - No trades is surprising

2 - OT's really were the need and WR's not in the top 10 is interesting

3 - Both QB needy teams stayed put and still got their guy

4 - Bills could have had one of the top 3 receivers if they stayed put

5 - The Pats could still get a QB

6 - The Raiders didn't mess up

Posted

Da raidahs pick WR Ruggs. Las Vegas though that’s just weak I’m sorry Vegas raiders what a disgrace

×
×
  • Create New...