BobbyC81 Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 Raiders are so dumb. They had Mack and Amari Cooper and since they traded them, they’ve continued to focus on replacements for them. 16
atlbillsfan1975 Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 Da Raiders should of kept Mack and paid him. Mack is all class and was a proven pass rusher. Yannick has not proven much except that he needs to stay off Twitter. 2 1 2
YoloinOhio Posted April 23, 2020 Author Posted April 23, 2020 This seems like the perfect team for Yannick. Hope he doesn’t get frostbite in the CRYotherapy machine. 1 11
Mountain Man Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, ColeB said: Raiders are so dumb. They had Mack and Amari Cooper and since they traded them, they’ve continued to focus on replacements for them. To be fair, they got multiple 1sts for Mack. If they get Ngakoue ultimately as replacement for just 1 1st then that's a good trade overall for them. Its basically Mack for Ngakoue and a 1st. Edited April 23, 2020 by Mountain Man 1 1
Rampage Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 I don't get this move. They signed Nassib, they drafted Maxx Crosby who had a huge year and then took Ferrell 4th overall(which will always be a head scratcher over Josh Allen), Jacksonville should take it and run. 2
BarleyNY Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 5 minutes ago, ColeB said: Raiders are so dumb. They had Mack and Amari Cooper and since they traded them, they’ve continued to focus on replacements for them. The Raiders were too cash strapped to sign Mack. Their poor revenue when they were in Oakland and the fact that the team is the main (only?) source of income for the Davis family was the problem. There is a CBA rule that requires that all guaranteed contract money is set aside at the time of signing. It’s a holdover from when the league was small and not guaranteed to succeed, but is still in effect. They were stuck. 3
Call_Of_Ktulu Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 Pick 19, the Raiders are ***** nuts. I would only go as high as a 2nd rd pick. To be honest I would be surprised if they even got a 3rd rd pick 3
JinxedBill Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 I think the virus may be some motivation as well here. Just like Beane did, I’d rather use my 1st on a proven commodity that can hit the ground running come TC if there is one. Yannick for a 1st is not a bad deal. 1
aristocrat Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 that's more than i thought the jags would get for him. jags would have 3 first rounders to load on talent. take that and run. 2
CapeBreton Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 We do play Vegas next year so hopefully they overpay if true.
Putin Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 16 minutes ago, JinxedBill said: I think the virus may be some motivation as well here. Just like Beane did, I’d rather use my 1st on a proven commodity that can hit the ground running come TC if there is one. Yannick for a 1st is not a bad deal. The cost is not only a 1st round pick , I’m pretty sure they will have to sign him to a new contract, ( 17-20 mil a year ? ) 1 1
thenorthremembers Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 The Raiders are doomed to be 8 and 8 forever they are spinning their wheels. Didnt want to pay Mack but want to give up a 1st and pay similar money to a lesser player. It was eye opening rewatching the 2014 draft last night. Gruden hated the Mack pick. Thought the Raiders needed to draft Manziel instead. Thankful Gruden and his ego are in the AFC. 29 minutes ago, aristocrat said: that's more than i thought the jags would get for him. jags would have 3 first rounders to load on talent. take that and run. If the Jags had done the right thing and fired Marone they would be able to reshape their organization with those picks. New coach, new qb. Instead they will use those picks on replacing the players who didnt want to play for the bozo head coach. 1
Fr. Jerk Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 47 minutes ago, atlbillsfan1975 said: Da Raiders should of kept Mack and paid him. Mack is all class and was a proven pass rusher. Yannick has not proven much except that he needs to stay off Twitter. Hindsight is 50\50 to Gruden. 2
Doc Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 14 minutes ago, Putin said: The cost is not only a 1st round pick , I’m pretty sure they will have to sign him to a new contract, ( 17-20 mil a year ? ) Mack got $23.5M/year. I hope YN asks for at least that much.
aristocrat Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 5 minutes ago, thenorthremembers said: The Raiders are doomed to be 8 and 8 forever they are spinning their wheels. Didnt want to pay Mack but want to give up a 1st and pay similar money to a lesser player. It was eye opening rewatching the 2014 draft last night. Gruden hated the Mack pick. Thought the Raiders needed to draft Manziel instead. Thankful Gruden and his ego are in the AFC. If the Jags had done the right thing and fired Marone they would be able to reshape their organization with those picks. New coach, new qb. Instead they will use those picks on replacing the players who didnt want to play for the bozo head coach. they better be sure about gardner if that's who they're rolling with. he had a pretty decent year last year but now they need a new secondary basically, a rb wr and tight end to start. if i were them i'd go cb, s and wr first 3 picks.
Putin Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 6 minutes ago, Doc said: Mack got $23.5M/year. I hope YN asks for at least that much. Do you think he’ll get $20 million a year ? Or even more ?
Doc Posted April 23, 2020 Posted April 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, Putin said: Do you think he’ll get $20 million a year ? Or even more ? I think $20M/year at least. That's what he was looking for. But you never know.
Recommended Posts