daz28 Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 7 minutes ago, KRC said: So, you can't prove it. Got it. Does this fall under the realm of suing you for defamation? Not if I have the tape of him saying he did it, no. 6 minutes ago, Doc said: There aren't. And you only just now came up with that viewpoint? Convenient. It's not really anything I spent much time thinking about. How do you feel about NDA's for sexual assaults?
GG Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 5 minutes ago, daz28 said: Not if I have the tape of him saying he did it, no. Provide the full quotes then 1
daz28 Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 8 minutes ago, GG said: Provide the full quotes then https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-bush-transcript-20161007-snap-htmlstory.html Perfect transcript, and an actual transcript. Not something I just say is a transcript that really isn't.
GG Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 1 minute ago, daz28 said: https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-bush-transcript-20161007-snap-htmlstory.html Perfect transcript, and an actual transcript. Not something I just say is a transcript that really isn't. Ok, so where did he admit to sexual assault? 1
IDBillzFan Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 49 minutes ago, daz28 said: If I said that I ate the ham sandwich, then I ate the ham sandwich. Just because later I found out it wasn't my ham sandwich, and denied eating it, doesn't mean I didn't eat it. Now I know you're only trying to defend Biden because you're starting to sound just like him. The only thing missing was you mumbling about that...uhhh, y'know...the thing...with bread thing... the Earl of Sandwich and so forth and such as... Do yourself a small favor: understand the point GG is making, digest the entire quote from, then break down where he admitted to sexually assaulting someone. Otherwise you sound like every other leftist: believe all women if they accuse a Republican, but rely on whataboutism if the woman accuses a presidential candidate of fingerphyucking her against her will.
Hardhatharry Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 (edited) Wow look at the people going crazy trying to reason something totally inappropriate said by the president. It just shows how hard some people will try to twist things depending on the side you are on... Even if it's also bad. Edited April 22, 2020 by Hardhatharry
daz28 Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 1 minute ago, IDBillzFan said: Now I know you're only trying to defend Biden because you're starting to sound just like him. The only thing missing was you mumbling about that...uhhh, y'know...the thing...with bread thing... the Earl of Sandwich and so forth and such as... Do yourself a small favor: understand the point GG is making, digest the entire quote from, then break down where he admitted to sexually assaulting someone. Otherwise you sound like every other leftist: believe all women if they accuse a Republican, but rely on whataboutism if the woman accuses a presidential candidate of fingerphyucking her against her will. I truly believe he has made unwanted sexual advances though, and I'm not likely going to change my mind. I do understand GG's point. I do not know how to handle the accusations. I think the women should be heard, but I also think that men should have a defense. I have no idea how to balance that, but in no way am I just defending Biden in a partisan manner. I simply don't believe that he said "c'mon man" to her.
GG Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Hardhatharry said: Wow look at the people going crazy trying to reason something totally inappropriate said by the president. It just shows how hard some people will try to twist things depending on the side you are on... Even if it's also bad. Wouldn't you agree that there's a pretty wide gulf between a crass, inappropriate discussion and sexual assault?
Doc Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 Just now, Hardhatharry said: Wow look at the people going crazy trying to reason something totally inappropriate said by the president. It just shows how hard some people will try to twist thing depending on the side you are on... Even if it's also bad. There's a difference between saying something inappropriate (which it was) versus admitting to sexually assaulting someone. There's also massive hypocrisy when claiming someone like Blasey-Ford, who had no evidence at all, should be believed, but Reade shouldn't. 1
Q-baby! Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 59 minutes ago, Foxx said: locker. room. talk. apparently you have never been around a bunch of guys embellishing their conquests. I have and they were guilty as well. 8 minutes ago, Hardhatharry said: Wow look at the people going crazy trying to reason something totally inappropriate said by the president. It just shows how hard some people will try to twist things depending on the side you are on... Even if it's also bad. They are call Dr.Trump ball lickers. It’s actually very common.
IDBillzFan Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 6 minutes ago, daz28 said: I truly believe he has made unwanted sexual advances though, and I'm not likely going to change my mind. I do understand GG's point. I do not know how to handle the accusations. I think the women should be heard, but I also think that men should have a defense. I have no idea how to balance that, but in no way am I just defending Biden in a partisan manner. I simply don't believe that he said "c'mon man" to her. The bottom line is that there are plenty of places on this side of the board that have discussed the entire, stupid 'grab them by the puzzy' thing, but instead of discussing the accusation of assault on Biden, you bring up Trump. If it weren't so preditable and overdone, it might actually be a little interesting, but the entire left in America schitt their pants over Kavanaugh and yet have literally nothing to say about an accusation against Biden. Forget your own political bend. You only have to be a smidge smarter than Qtip and Tibs to see the hypocrisy. Be better. Try harder. It's not difficult.
Foxx Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 43 minutes ago, daz28 said: ... How do you feel about NDA's for sexual assaults? so... if there is a NDA, how do you or anyone else know that a sexual assault occurred?
RochesterRob Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 16 minutes ago, Q-baby! said: I have and they were guilty as well. They are call Dr.Trump ball lickers. It’s actually very common. You are obsessed with ball licking. Why is that? Do you have unfulfilled desires? Not that I agree with you but there are words to describe a perceived hypocrisy such as the word hypocrite. Try expanding your cache of words.
daz28 Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 12 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said: The bottom line is that there are plenty of places on this side of the board that have discussed the entire, stupid 'grab them by the puzzy' thing, but instead of discussing the accusation of assault on Biden, you bring up Trump. If it weren't so preditable and overdone, it might actually be a little interesting, but the entire left in America schitt their pants over Kavanaugh and yet have literally nothing to say about an accusation against Biden. Forget your own political bend. You only have to be a smidge smarter than Qtip and Tibs to see the hypocrisy. Be better. Try harder. It's not difficult. Trump was brought up to show that there is a double standard being used. I said it was ok now to go after Biden, but wasn't ok to go after Trump(talk about hypocrisy). Context matters. I did make my points on the Biden accusation, and accusations in general. 4 minutes ago, Foxx said: so... if there is a NDA, how do you or anyone else know that a sexual assault occurred? I'm just raising the question. To me it's a bit silly that you can legally cover up a crime by silencing the victim. It seems absurd to me. Then again a court system that makes it easier to pay off a liar is also absurd.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 2 hours ago, daz28 said: You've wasted 3 post on trying to get me to totally exonerate him, when you could have just done it yourself. I'm going to assume you can't. You said he committed sexual assault when he didn’t. Unless you are saying two men talking in private constitutes a sexual assault on a female who was not even present. But details. Stick with those FEELZ over facts. It’s served you well and hasn’t left you hilariously broken. 2 hours ago, daz28 said: If I said that I ate the ham sandwich, then I ate the ham sandwich. Just because later I found out it wasn't my ham sandwich, and denied eating it, doesn't mean I didn't eat it. Proof of how great you’re doing cognitively with your approach to information 1 hour ago, daz28 said: I thought Weinstein was joking too, but what do I know. More proof you’re beyond hope with this attempted spin: No one thought Harvey was joking. Because he didn’t joke, or talk, he did. Difference.
daz28 Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: You said he committed sexual assault when he didn’t. Unless you are saying two men talking in private constitutes a sexual assault on a female who was not even present. But details. Stick with those FEELZ over facts. It’s served you well and hasn’t left you hilariously broken. Should I apologize for taking a man at his word, or should I just always assume he's lying/joking? I guess with Trump, I should always assume he's not speaking truthfully.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 1 hour ago, Hardhatharry said: Wow look at the people going crazy trying to reason something totally inappropriate said by the president. “Something total inappropriate said” — is not a physical act of abuse. The asshat who started this claimed those words constituted an assault in and of themselves. They didn’t. Which is the point. 1 minute ago, daz28 said: Should I apologize for taking a man at his word, or should I just always assume he's lying/joking? I guess with Trump, I should always assume he's not speaking truthfully. You said he committed an assault — and then to prove that you point to words he said with a man while no women were present. And those words didn’t say “I did it”, they said he “COULD” do it. Words matter. Context matters. Unless you’re you — someone driven by feels and emotion rather than fact. TDS is toxic when left unchecked. Do better. 1
Warren Zevon Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: physical act of abuse
Q-baby! Posted April 22, 2020 Posted April 22, 2020 54 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: You are obsessed with ball licking. Why is that? Do you have unfulfilled desires? Not that I agree with you but there are words to describe a perceived hypocrisy such as the word hypocrite. Try expanding your cache of words. I call em as I see em! I don’t need to do porn movies to know what a porn movie is! Keep on lickin’! 1
Recommended Posts