/dev/null Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 your 15 minutes are just about up... http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php
Bishop Hedd Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 your 15 minutes are just about up... http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php 307939[/snapback] ?
SilverNRed Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 your 15 minutes are just about up... http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php 307939[/snapback] His 15 minutes were up an hour ago. Or should I say last November?
BillsFanNC Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Who's Michael Moore? 308304[/snapback] A very useful idiot.
/dev/null Posted April 18, 2005 Author Posted April 18, 2005 reading these replies makes me think my watch is abit slow
Bishop Hedd Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 I'm still trying to make heads or tails out of the basis for this thread. Lemmie see here, it appears as if Moore is taking a week break for something or other and suddenly his career is over with? The guy just made the highest grossing documentary in history, won an academy award, written three best sellers and his career is over with? If that's the case Tom Brady must be in real trouble this off-season.
IDBillzFan Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 The guy just made the highest grossing documentary in history 308321[/snapback] Which would be an accomplishment if what he made was actually a documentary.
Bishop Hedd Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Which would be an accomplishment if what he made was actually a documentary. 308330[/snapback] It seems if you just mention Moore's name for no reason it riles up the Bushinista militia here. Weren't you just complaining about reflexive criticism of your boy Bush a few minutes ago?
IDBillzFan Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 It seems if you just mention Moore's name for no reason it riles up the Bushinista militia here.Weren't you just complaining about reflexive criticism of your boy Bush a few minutes ago? 308335[/snapback] I was complaining about someone being critical of a person who has the balls to stop moving forward on one of their own decisions when it appears their decision was going awry. And when I say F911 isn't a documentary, that wasn't me talking; that was your pal, Mr. Moore. But I like your terminology: Bushinista militia. Is that how you term people who don't agree with you? What do you call people who DO agree with you? Hedd Suckers?
Bishop Hedd Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 I was complaining about someone being critical of a person who has the balls to stop moving forward on one of their own decisions when it appears their decision was going awry. And when I say F911 isn't a documentary, that wasn't me talking; that was your pal, Mr. Moore. But I like your terminology: Bushinista militia. Is that how you term people who don't agree with you? What do you call people who DO agree with you? Hedd Suckers? 308346[/snapback] I was criticizing a poorly thought out piece of garbage legislation that would have a severe impact on not only my life and work (I can walk out the door now and be at the Peace Bridge in 10 minutes) but the lives of most WNY'ers. I don't particularly care who was responsible for this nonsense but I would at least like to know the motivation behind it (which is certainly NOT to protect the borders), and the motivation for Bush's pulling back. It was you and another poster who got all sensitive (waaaahhhhhh! look he's picking on Georgy again) in response. Your response is typical of the right these days though (see exhibit A: Tom DeLay) act all wounded and insulted when you take when of your boys to task. Or you can always do what you're doing here, throw Michael Moore's name into the equation for no discernible reason.
Alaska Darin Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 Your response is typical of the right these days though (see exhibit A: Tom DeLay) act all wounded and insulted when you take when of your boys to task. Or you can always do what you're doing here, throw Michael Moore's name into the equation for no discernible reason. 308355[/snapback] Ladies and germs, irony defined in 2 sentences or less. Your middle name start with a "d" and end in "ick"?
erynthered Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 I was criticizing a poorly thought out piece of garbage legislation that would have a severe impact on not only my life and work (I can walk out the door now and be at the Peace Bridge in 10 minutes) but the lives of most WNY'ers. I don't particularly care who was responsible for this nonsense but I would at least like to know the motivation behind it (which is certainly NOT to protect the borders), and the motivation for Bush's pulling back. It was you and another poster who got all sensitive (waaaahhhhhh! look he's picking on Georgy again) in response. Your response is typical of the right these days though (see exhibit A: Tom DeLay) act all wounded and insulted when you take when of your boys to task. Or you can always do what you're doing here, throw Michael Moore's name into the equation for no discernible reason. 308355[/snapback] Nice spin, so much for Mr. Moore. Start a new whine thread, and tells us how you really feel. Dont forget your Kleenex.
IDBillzFan Posted April 18, 2005 Posted April 18, 2005 I was criticizing a poorly thought out piece of garbage legislation that would have a severe impact on not only my life and work (I can walk out the door now and be at the Peace Bridge in 10 minutes) but the lives of most WNY'ers. I don't particularly care who was responsible for this nonsense but I would at least like to know the motivation behind it (which is certainly NOT to protect the borders), and the motivation for Bush's pulling back. It was you and another poster who got all sensitive (waaaahhhhhh! look he's picking on Georgy again) in response. Your response is typical of the right these days though (see exhibit A: Tom DeLay) act all wounded and insulted when you take when of your boys to task. Or you can always do what you're doing here, throw Michael Moore's name into the equation for no discernible reason. 308355[/snapback] That's the first time a post in a thread actually caused irony to drip down my computer screen. Nevermind, Bishop. I don't spend a lot of time here, but I can tell those who do who don't agree with you clearly get the standard "And that's the problem with people on the right..." speech.
Bishop Hedd Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 That's the first time a post in a thread actually caused irony to drip down my computer screen. Nevermind, Bishop. I don't spend a lot of time here, but I can tell those who do who don't agree with you clearly get the standard "And that's the problem with people on the right..." speech. 308390[/snapback] You may find it strange, but I react the same exact way when Potsie and the rest of the far right here post using tried and true ill-conceived and poorly thought out *code words*. Let's see what I've discovered in my short time here: Michael Moore Hillary taxes They wanna take away our guns activist judges Protest against the war and you're a commie subversive liberal press Whitewater New Deal socialism Ted Kennedy They're anti-Christian! ...and on it goes. Of course no argument is given as to why these are either good or bad. They're just spouted out in some form of neo-con/libbertearuhn stream of counsciousness. I just have to laugh.
erynthered Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 *code words*. Let's see what I've discovered in my short time here: 308446[/snapback] Just maybe, Just maybe, do you think you're reading a little to much into this. I find this board it very informitive. And do you know why Putz? Because I look at the whole picture, not just the left or the right side. Your ignorance shines bright with your posts lately. Please continue.
Bishop Hedd Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 Just maybe, Just maybe, do you think you're reading a little to much into this. I find this board it very informitive. And do you know why Putz? Because I look at the whole picture, not just the left or the right side. Your ignorance shines bright with your posts lately. Please continue. 308450[/snapback] "Putz"? Yiddish, right?
IDBillzFan Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 "Putz"? Yiddish, right? 308452[/snapback] It's our secret code word for Potsie.
Bishop Hedd Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 It's our secret code word for Potsie. 308465[/snapback] Gotcha. Now to get back to the thread, if Dev Null's out there I'd like to ask what the basis for the thread was? That was actually my original reply to the topic. Did he give up Show Biz-which is unlikely because the man obviously has a big ego- or are you just throwing out red meat to the hounds?
SilverNRed Posted April 19, 2005 Posted April 19, 2005 Let's see what I've discovered in my short time here:Michael Moore Hillary taxes They wanna take away our guns activist judges Protest against the war and you're a commie subversive liberal press Whitewater New Deal socialism Ted Kennedy They're anti-Christian! 308446[/snapback] You just discovered the liberal press now?? Yeah, in other news, the sky is blue and the earth is round.
Recommended Posts