Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

Not really going out on a limb by Chris there. 

 

All extremely realistic scenarios if you've spent any time studying these guys. 

Posted
1 minute ago, HappyDays said:

 

 

Man that would be a lot to give up for them. I personally wouldn't do it if I were in their shoes but they definitely have the ammo if they want to.

Posted
3 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

That would be OUTRAGEOUS. Two top 5 talents in this draft could change their franchise. Draft Tua and Jeudy and let them cook.

Posted
5 minutes ago, FireChans said:

That would be OUTRAGEOUS. Two top 5 talents in this draft could change their franchise. Draft Tua and Jeudy and let them cook.

 

It would be Tua and a Tackle

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

I see Baun and Fulton as trade up targets for the Bills if either of them is sitting there in the late 30's to early 40's.

 

 

4 minutes ago, Doc said:

It would require the Giants dropping from 3 to 18 (plus a slew of other picks).  Not gonna happen.

 

It's the lions who would have to move, and I wouldn't be shocked to see them do it... The lions are stupid and have no direction. 

Just now, Coach Tuesday said:

Can someone explain to me why they didn’t just pay Tunsil?

 

Also, I’m old, but I miss John Candy.

 

Because they're idiots. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 


So if they were to move 18 and 26 plus others to get to 3, they’d get an OT and eliminate the threat of all 3 QBs going before the 5th pick.

Posted
1 minute ago, Coach Tuesday said:

Can someone explain to me why they didn’t just pay Tunsil?

 

Also, I’m old, but I miss John Candy.

 

Well he was a decent LT and only became a Pro Bowler after protecting a Pro Bowlers blind side. 

 

1 minute ago, whatdrought said:

It's the lions who would have to move, and I wouldn't be shocked to see them do it... The lions are stupid and have no direction.

 

My bad, the Lions.  But Patricia isn't stupid.

Posted
1 minute ago, thebandit27 said:


So if they were to move 18 and 26 plus others to get to 3, they’d get an OT and eliminate the threat of all 3 QBs going before the 5th pick.

 

Why trade two 1st round picks for an OT after trading Tunsil for two 1st round picks? Doesn't add up.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, thebandit27 said:


So if they were to move 18 and 26 plus others to get to 3, they’d get an OT and eliminate the threat of all 3 QBs going before the 5th pick.

Unless LAC moves to 4 and takes the guy they Really want. They have to prefer one over the other, I can’t imagine they would risk losing their #1 QB choice and just decide that they will take whichever one is still there at 5. They may have info that LAC prefers Herbert but who can be trusted. They would need to take their QB at 3 and risk their OT is still there at 5. Jmo

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Not buying this...

If I'm Detroit, I'm laughing all the way to the bank... Yep, trade with me at 3, I'll take your extra 1st round picks, THEN still probably get Okuda (CB sp?) or Tua at 5.... :thumbsup:

Posted
10 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Unless LAC moves to 4 and takes the guy they Really want. They have to prefer one over the other, I can’t imagine they would risk losing their #1 QB choice and just decide that they will take whichever one is still there at 5. They may have info that LAC prefers Herbert but who can be trusted. They would need to take their QB at 3 and risk their OT is still there at 5. Jmo

 

The Giants will in all likelihood take a LT at 4.  So that's why I see the Dols might want to take one at 3.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

The Giants will in all likelihood take a LT at 4.  So that's why I see the Dols might want to take one at 3.

Thats what I thought but you are either risking losing your #1 OT or your #1 QB. Seems to me the greater risk is losing the QB, that you would be more locked in the player/person/scheme fit at that position than anywhere else. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Thats what I thought but you are either risking losing your #1 OT or your #1 QB. Seems to me the greater risk is losing the QB, that you would be more locked in the player/person/scheme fit at that position than anywhere else. 

 

True and the Giants could very well trade out of 4 if the Dols take a LT at 3. 

 

In any case, I don't see the Lions dropping all the way down to 18 in this draft.

Posted
1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

True and the Giants could very well trade out of 4 if the Dols take a LT at 3. 

 

In any case, I don't see the Lions dropping all the way down to 18 in this draft.

I guess they would get 18, 26 and a 2021 1st? Would that do it?

×
×
  • Create New...