Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I would say no based on his voting record. When you get into other views he has expressed, it would be a hard no.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, B-Man said:

No.

 

 

only 39, not enough experience.

 

Also a lawyer, I kind of like having a businessman at the helm.

 

 

.

 

...know nothing about him......wonder if he did generate enough support to where he in the "new Ross Perot" as an Independent 3rd party, taking enough away from Trump whereby "Oh No Joe" moves into 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.....pretty scary.......Joe sleeps through the inauguration and VP Abrams is the "new boss"...I need another drink......

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Magox said:

I tell you who would.

 

TYTT

 

and maybe Devnull

 

I would have considered him if he hadn't jumped on the RussiaRussiaRussia!!! Bandwagon

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

 

I would have considered him if he hadn't jumped on the RussiaRussiaRussia!!! Bandwagon

I have many libertarian points of view.  However, I think it is hard to create a comprehensive governing policy for running the executive branch as a Libertarian.  A better fit for him is in the court system if he really wanted to make an impact.  I suspect he is like the majority of politicians - out for himself and the pursuit of power.

 

Plus RussiaRussiaRussia.  Proves he is not a really a thinker and not objective.

×
×
  • Create New...