Gene Frenkle Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 Sounds like there were a couple of botched studies. Have they tried it with zinc? Most importantly, does it work yet??
Gene Frenkle Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 5 minutes ago, Reality Check said: So, no? Not yet? The wait continues...
Reality Check Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 1 minute ago, Gene Frenkle said: So, no? Not yet? It works. Not for you though.
Gene Frenkle Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 21 minutes ago, Reality Check said: It works. Not for you though. Your belief is strong. Don't stop believing.
Nanker Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 They’re thinking about doing a CLINICAL TRIAL and the results will provide the answer that you seek. Please come back in six years when the results will be published. 3
GG Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 (edited) 7 hours ago, Gene Frenkle said: Sounds like there were a couple of botched studies. Have they tried it with zinc? Most importantly, does it work yet?? It doesn't bother you that there was a coordinated effort to derail trials and introduce doubts into a potential lifesaving treatment? Edited June 5, 2020 by GG 3
Nanker Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 Probably not because there’s so much at stake to make the orange man look badder. 2
Reality Check Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 6 hours ago, Gene Frenkle said: Your belief is strong. Don't stop believing.
Just Joshin' Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 On 6/2/2020 at 4:10 PM, Magox said: Isn't this the report that the media has been hyperventilating about? And then this Hard to believe that a respected medical publication would ruin their reputation just to make Trump look bad. What makes people want to hurt others to get a shot in at Trump? 3
Reality Check Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 4 minutes ago, Just Joshin' said: Hard to believe that a respected medical publication would ruin their reputation just to make Trump look bad. What makes people want to hurt others to get a shot in at Trump? Trump is in the way of their agenda. That is why.
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 8 minutes ago, Just Joshin' said: Hard to believe that a respected medical publication would ruin their reputation just to make Trump look bad. What makes people want to hurt others to get a shot in at Trump? Well, they retracted today, sooooo...Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis 1
BillsFanNC Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 12 hours ago, SectionC3 said: Sooo ... why not recommend zinc and broccoli instead of zinc and HCQ. Broccoli might cause indigestion, but it’s no threat to create an arrhythmia, right? We need the Big Broccoli lobby to get on that stat.
SectionC3 Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 32 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: We need the Big Broccoli lobby to get on that stat. The country would be full of stinky piss. But we would be healthier for it.
Doc Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 10 hours ago, Gene Frenkle said: Sounds like there were a couple of botched studies. Have they tried it with zinc? Most importantly, does it work yet?? Ask Amy. She says yes. She might be Vice President, and maybe President one day. 1 2
Deranged Rhino Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 3 hours ago, Just Joshin' said: Hard to believe that a respected medical publication would ruin their reputation just to make Trump look bad. What makes people want to hurt others to get a shot in at Trump? TDS is a crippling condition if left unchecked. And the Trump curse is very real. They should have known. 1
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 ...so mea culpas are forthcoming (COUGH)??………….. Network newscasts skip major hydroxychloroquine report retractions, org says By Brian Flood | Fox News Evening newscasts on ABC, CBS and NBC all ignored experts raising “serious scientific questions” about the data used for controversial research into the effectiveness of potential COVID-19 drug hydroxychloroquine, according to the conservative media watchdog group NewsBusters. “All three [networks] had used the study to chide President Trump for pushing the drug and taking it himself,” NewsBuster analyst Nicholas Fondacaro, who studied the coverage, wrote. A database by the Chicago company Surgisphere Corp. was used in an observational study of nearly 100,000 patients published on May 22 in the influential Lancet journal that tied the malaria drugs hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine to a higher risk of death in hospitalized patients with the virus. The validity of the data, however, has been called into question. The Lancet first published an “expression of concern” with the study after “serious scientific questions” were brought to its attention. It then retracted the report altogether on Thursday. A separate paper, which also used the Surgisphere data, was also retracted from The New England Journal of Medicine. Earlier this week the NEJM issued an “expression of concern” regarding the study published May 1 that suggested widely used blood pressure medicines were not raising the risk of death for people with COVID-19. https://www.foxnews.com/media/network-newscasts-skip-hydroxychloroquine-report-retractions
Doc Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 45 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...so mea culpas are forthcoming (COUGH)??………….. Network newscasts skip major hydroxychloroquine report retractions, org says By Brian Flood | Fox News Evening newscasts on ABC, CBS and NBC all ignored experts raising “serious scientific questions” about the data used for controversial research into the effectiveness of potential COVID-19 drug hydroxychloroquine, according to the conservative media watchdog group NewsBusters. “All three [networks] had used the study to chide President Trump for pushing the drug and taking it himself,” NewsBuster analyst Nicholas Fondacaro, who studied the coverage, wrote. A database by the Chicago company Surgisphere Corp. was used in an observational study of nearly 100,000 patients published on May 22 in the influential Lancet journal that tied the malaria drugs hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine to a higher risk of death in hospitalized patients with the virus. The validity of the data, however, has been called into question. The Lancet first published an “expression of concern” with the study after “serious scientific questions” were brought to its attention. It then retracted the report altogether on Thursday. A separate paper, which also used the Surgisphere data, was also retracted from The New England Journal of Medicine. Earlier this week the NEJM issued an “expression of concern” regarding the study published May 1 that suggested widely used blood pressure medicines were not raising the risk of death for people with COVID-19. https://www.foxnews.com/media/network-newscasts-skip-hydroxychloroquine-report-retractions Interesting. You'd think that allegedly unbiased news organizations like the ones above would seek to correct the incorrect "news" they gleefully peddled. 2
The Poojer Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 that's asparagus...get your green veggies straight man!!! 3 hours ago, SectionC3 said: The country would be full of stinky piss. But we would be healthier for it.
Recommended Posts