Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

See it yet? 

 

It works, they know / knew it works, but they had to deny it. Lie about it.

 

 

Time to wake up. 

 

Yup.  They just wanted people to die so it would make Trump look bad.

 

I'm seeing a new PCP next month.  I used to work with him when he did that and GI procedures.  Great guy.  But I'm going to ask him about HCQ and if he says it's BS, I'll be done with him quick.

  • Thank you (+1) 4
Posted

 

 

The Cliff Notes: there is a little known medical data analytics company named Surgisphere in Chicago that purportedly gathered 100k cases of COVID patients treated with HQC.

/1

 

Surgisphere is the sole source of the HQC study that appeared in the blue ribbon, peer reviewed medical journal The Lancet. They also provided data another COVID study that appeared in New England Journal of Medicine.

/2

 
 

Surgisphere claimed to have data sharing agreements with hundreds of hospitals around the US and the world, despite having, it appears, only 5 employees, only one of whom has any medical background.

/3

 
 

Two of the other employees, according to the Guardian, include a science fiction writer and a male model for hire.

/4

 

 

How this ragtag Fab Five let's-put-on-an-international-medical-data-gathering-show was able to sign up data sharing contracts with hundreds of hospitals around the world is a bit of a mystery, but I'd be happy to hear the explanation.

/5

 

Apparently, the peer reviewers at The Lancet and NEJM didn't share my curiosity about this, before putting their imprimatur on studies that relied solely on Surgisphere data. You know, that one that proved HQC will make you DIE

/6

 

But don't worry, the Lancet and NEJM are out there busily issuing concerns and checking things and whatnot, now that their peer reviewers have been peer reviewed.

/7

 
 
 

Does HQC kill COVID patients? Hell if I know. Does it make COVID patients better? Hell if I know. Will I trust The Lancet or NEJM when they finally issue conclusions on these questions? Hell if I know.

/8

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
57 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yup.  They just wanted people to die so it would make Trump look bad.

 

I'm seeing a new PCP next month.  I used to work with him when he did that and GI procedures.  Great guy.  But I'm going to ask him about HCQ and if he says it's BS, I'll be done with him quick.

I hope he us the right PCP for you. Good doctors are priceless.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Reality Check said:

Sorry, but I don't trust talking Gummi Bears.

 

I assure you, they are certainly okay if they are low in THC... 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Magox said:

Well.....What'da'ya'know

 

 

Wait a minute. You mean to tell me the WHO is anti-science? Now I don't know who to blindly trust.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Magox said:

Well.....What'da'ya'know

 

 


That’s a real official Twitter handle there - You think Trump probably runs it himself? 

 

 

Posted

Come on folks. We all know why their dragging their feet with Hydroxychoroquine. PRICE!!!!!!!!!!! At 60 cents a pop, no one in pharma or probably the medical field wants such a cheap cure.

However, if they can just convince people, even against what studies suggest, that remdesivir is the answer, well that could net over 4 thousand per patient.

https://www.fiercepharma.com/marketing/gilead-s-covid-19-therapy-remdesivir-worth-4-460-per-course-says-pricing-watchdog

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, BillStime said:


That’s a real official Twitter handle there - You think Trump probably runs it himself? 

 

 

 

Textbook response

 

There are links to the Reuters story, links to the WHO announcement,

 

But BillZtime  BillStime  cannot see, or comprehend, past the Twitter name.

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Textbook response

 

There are links to the Reuters story, links to the WHO announcement,

 

But BillZtime  BillStime  cannot see, or comprehend, past the Twitter name.

 

 

 

 


I knew you would respond - you make @Deranged Rhino proud. 
 

good dog

Posted
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:


giphy.gif?cid=4d1e4f29f2a2163adc27785caa

 

You were on the list awhile ago.

 

And BTW, C3 would say you're fat.  I wouldn't stoop that low.

Posted
15 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Textbook response

 

There are links to the Reuters story, links to the WHO announcement,

 

But BillZtime  BillStime  cannot see, or comprehend, past the Twitter name.

 

 

 

 

 

I've got that clown blocked.

 

Is that what he said?  lol

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Magox said:

Well.....What'da'ya'know

 

 

 

Wha...? It's almost like the WHO is more interested in playing politics than giving a flying crap about providing actual medical advice.

×
×
  • Create New...