Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

The giveaway is how much they're trying to make you afraid of a drug that's been on the market for decades... 

 

FEAR = CONTROL

 

If a cheap, available drug cocktail already exists that helps prevent and counter Covid -- no lock down would be needed, no crushing of the economy would be needed, no increase in the state's power over you would be tolerated. 

 

Learn your enemies. 

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

The methodology of some of these "studies" (especially the VA one) seems to amount to:

 

"I tried to apply a bandage to someone who had already bled out. The person died right after I bandaged the wound. Bandages don't work!"

 

Even the latest "studies" being announced don't seem to mention that they're combining HCQ with Zinc or Z-Paks, which is immediately going to skew the results to get to the predetermined narrative that it doesn't work.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Back when Trump first mentioned the miracle drug, did he mention zinc? Or does he not know anybody that profits from the sale of zinc? 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
21 hours ago, Koko78 said:

The methodology of some of these "studies" (especially the VA one) seems to amount to:

 

"I tried to apply a bandage to someone who had already bled out. The person died right after I bandaged the wound. Bandages don't work!"

 

Even the latest "studies" being announced don't seem to mention that they're combining HCQ with Zinc or Z-Paks, which is immediately going to skew the results to get to the predetermined narrative that it doesn't work.

....time out counselor......do you dare to say that these "rush to market studies" are NOT politically motivated and in the best interest "of the public"??.....I would think that if 5 died, it would surely validate a viable (COUGH) study, right?.....

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

For months, President Trump has promoted hydroxychloroquine as a potential treatment for covid-19, calling the anti-malarial drug a “game changer,” asking patients, “What do you have to lose?” — and even announcing that he was taking the drug in an attempt to ward off the novel coronavirus.

On Monday, however, the World Health Organization announced that it had temporarily halted its global trial of the drug, citing a new study that found a significantly higher risk of death among those taking hydroxychloroquine or the closely related drug chloroquine.

“The Executive Group has implemented a temporary pause of the hydroxychloroquine arm within the Solidarity Trial while the safety data is reviewed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board,” Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO’s director general, said in a briefing.

Read more here.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

For months, President Trump has promoted hydroxychloroquine as a potential treatment for covid-19, calling the anti-malarial drug a “game changer,” asking patients, “What do you have to lose?” — and even announcing that he was taking the drug in an attempt to ward off the novel coronavirus.

On Monday, however, the World Health Organization announced that it had temporarily halted its global trial of the drug, citing a new study that found a significantly higher risk of death among those taking hydroxychloroquine or the closely related drug chloroquine.

“The Executive Group has implemented a temporary pause of the hydroxychloroquine arm within the Solidarity Trial while the safety data is reviewed by the Data Safety Monitoring Board,” Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO’s director general, said in a briefing.

Read more here.

 

You're still not paying attention! WTF would we listen to anything WHO tells us at this point in the game?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

So the WHO used that worthless study as their basis.  Wow, they're even more useless than I thought.  Pull their funding permanently.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Magox said:

Again, I don't know if it works or not. My suspicions are that with some sort of combination that it works early on and/or for prophylactic purposes. 

 

This was an interesting finding from the UAE.  They have a paper that they published to review.  You can read that here https://www.dha.gov.ae/en/HealthRegulation/Documents/COVID National Guidelines FINAL 18 March.pdf

 

 

 

You can stop trying to prove the unprovable.

 

There's a consensus.  This ***** will kill you.  See global warming. Consensus!

 

Nevertheless myself and all of my relatives will take it if we get or are exposed to Covid.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

It appears that Didier Raoult suggests data manipulation behind the recent study published in the Lancet on hydroxycholorquine.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Magox said:

It appears that Didier Raoult suggests data manipulation behind the recent study published in the Lancet on hydroxycholorquine.

 

 

 

Anyone here speak French that can give a synopsis of what he says they faked?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Taro T said:

 

Anyone here speak French that can give a synopsis of what he says they faked?

 

57207-cheese-eating-surrender-monkeys-th

 

 

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Taro T said:

 

Anyone here speak French that can give a synopsis of what he says they faked?

This from Google Translate: Regarding the Lancet article: it is not possible that there is such homogeneity between patients from 5 different continents. There is prior manipulation, not mentioned in the material and methods, or this data is distorted.

Posted
Just now, 3rdnlng said:

This from Google Translate: Regarding the Lancet article: it is not possible that there is such homogeneity between patients from 5 different continents. There is prior manipulation, not mentioned in the material and methods, or this data is distorted.

 

Danke.  After asking the question noticed that homogeneity of those particular markers.  But several others also seem to be quite similar.  Wasn't sure if that was the extent of his concerns about the veracity of the study/researchers or if there was more.

Posted

So let me see if I have this right.  The President announces that he's pulling funding from WHO, and then later announces that he's taking a certain drug....and ANYONE is shocked that the WHO would pull support for that same drug?  Really?

And....just for kicks...there's a GNC Store in every shopping mall in America, selling all sorts of supplements and other crap that nobody needs a doctor to prescribe.  Should we ask every elected official if they are taking any of the over-hyped garbage being sold in those stores and all across the internet?  How about any of the over-prescribed, fancy sounding drugs that you see on TV all day and night long?  Should we ask Uncle Joe if he's taken Previgen to help with his memory?  You know it comes from Jelly Fish, right?

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

So let me see if I have this right.  The President announces that he's pulling funding from WHO, and then later announces that he's taking a certain drug....and ANYONE is shocked that the WHO would pull support for that same drug?  Really?

And....just for kicks...there's a GNC Store in every shopping mall in America, selling all sorts of supplements and other crap that nobody needs a doctor to prescribe.  Should we ask every elected official if they are taking any of the over-hyped garbage being sold in those stores and all across the internet?  How about any of the over-prescribed, fancy sounding drugs that you see on TV all day and night long?  Should we ask Uncle Joe if he's taken Previgen to help with his memory?  You know it comes from Jelly Fish, right?

Are those elected officials using their platform to sell those products? Your entire post is stupid! 

Edited by Q-baby!
  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...