B-Man Posted May 7, 2020 Posted May 7, 2020 Absentee Ballots for those who truly need them.......................Of Course Mail-in ballots for everyone.....................NO. Wisconsin Shows That Mail-in Ballots Are Not Necessary to Stop the Spread of the Coronavirus Read more at townhall.com ... 1
Warren Zevon Posted May 7, 2020 Author Posted May 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: Absentee Ballots for those who truly need them.......................Of Course Mail-in ballots for everyone.....................NO. Tons of middle ground between those who truly need them and everyone. I don't truly need one but I'll request one. Should that be illegal?
Koko78 Posted May 7, 2020 Posted May 7, 2020 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Are we catching on yet ?? I know that my first thought, when confronted with a potential election-fraud issue, is to wonder what the Centers for Disease Control thinks. 1
B-Man Posted May 8, 2020 Posted May 8, 2020 20 hours ago, B-Man said: Are we catching on yet ?? Is the CDC Meddling with the 2020 Election? by Julie Kelly Original Article The same politicized CDC that considers Gun control part of their mission ? Naaaaaaahhh. 2 1
keepthefaith Posted May 9, 2020 Posted May 9, 2020 There needs to be a purity in voting. For me that means we all vote in person (with few exceptions), identifying ourselves and on the same day. Absentee voting should be the limited and be administered with tight rules. There should be no early voting IMO. Make election day a national Holiday. As for going to the polls, we can absolutely practice safe health habits in polling places. 6
B-Man Posted May 10, 2020 Posted May 10, 2020 Ballot Harvesting Heaven: Gov. Newsom orders mail-in ballots for all California voters It worked well last time. 2 1
B-Man Posted May 11, 2020 Posted May 11, 2020 JOHN FUND: Mail-In Ballots are a Recipe for Confusion, Coercion and Fraud. 1 1
B-Man Posted May 12, 2020 Posted May 12, 2020 NO, ABSENTEE BALLOTS AREN’T THE SAME THING AS VOTE-BY-MAIL: There are huge differences 1
Motorin' Posted May 12, 2020 Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) On 4/8/2020 at 12:10 PM, RochesterRob said: You are being intellectually dishonest. Absentee ballots amount to 1 out of 1000 potential voters so they can be very easily verified by any group having a concern. A municipality that has 100,000 voters will have extreme difficulty validating all ballots cast in a 100 percent mail in process in a timely manner. Except that in cities that already use vote by mail, they are pre-validated. The voter has to request the ballot online, input the correct social security number, address and state id #. The name, social, state id # and address have to match the same info on the voter registration. It's probably more secure than voting in person in many places. Edited May 12, 2020 by Motorin'
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted May 12, 2020 Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) ...I'm confused....would "absentee ballots" still include dead people as usual?...... Edited May 12, 2020 by OldTimeAFLGuy
Motorin' Posted May 12, 2020 Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) 33 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...I'm confused....would "absentee ballots" still include dead people as usual?...... I'd love to see proven examples of dead people voting. please? With the vote by mail requirement, in order to vote for a dead person you'd have to have their driver's licenser, register them to vote at the address on the license, go online, request a ballot, input the correct social security number and driver license #, have the ballot sent to the previous address and then steal it from the mailbox. If local officials are so corrupt, they can just have the board of elections stuff the ballots themselves. Way easier than the steps that would be required to perform large scale vote by mail fraud. Edited May 12, 2020 by Motorin'
unbillievable Posted May 12, 2020 Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Motorin' said: I'd love to see proven examples of dead people voting. please? With the vote by mail requirement, in order to vote for a dead person you'd have to have their driver's licenser, register them to vote at the address on the license, go online, request a ballot, input the correct social security number and driver license #, have the ballot sent to the previous address and then steal it from the mailbox. If local officials are so corrupt, they can just have the board of elections stuff the ballots themselves. Way easier than the steps that would be required to perform large scale vote by mail fraud. https://www.kqed.org/news/10976877/are-californians-casting-ballots-from-the-grave There is no doubt that dead/illegal/identity theft voting occurs. The excuse has always been that it doesn't happen enough to be relevant; which is a reason why Democrats are adamant that no checks be made by law enforcement on just how often it occurs; ie voter ID's. The Democrats policy is that it can't happen if we don't actively look for it. Now imagine how much easier it will be to commit fraud with mail-in ballots; Simply harvest ballots from people who never vote and do it for them... Not to mention the recent Census argument from lefties that illegal aliens should count towards a state's allowed Representatives, (and electoral votes.) Edited May 12, 2020 by unbillievable
Motorin' Posted May 12, 2020 Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) 30 minutes ago, unbillievable said: https://www.kqed.org/news/10976877/are-californians-casting-ballots-from-the-grave There is no doubt that dead/illegal/identity theft voting occurs. The excuse has always been that it doesn't happen enough to be relevant; which is a reason why Democrats are adamant that no checks be made by law enforcement on just how often it occurs; ie voter ID's. The Democrats policy is that it can't happen if we don't actively look for it. Now imagine how much easier it will be to commit fraud with mail-in ballots; Simply harvest ballots from people who never vote and do it for them... Not to mention the recent Census argument from lefties that illegal aliens should count towards a state's allowed Representatives, (and electoral votes.) Lots of imagination is certainly required. “When you look at the numbers we’re talking about in LA County -- 215 voters out of 4.7 million registered voters in LA -- you’re talking about an error rate that’s .0000453 percent.” What's to stop the the evil Dems from registering all of those non-voters and stuffing the ballots already? How would they go about extracting the ballots from people's mailboxes? Totally false narrative. Edited May 12, 2020 by Motorin'
unbillievable Posted May 12, 2020 Posted May 12, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Motorin' said: Lots of imagination is certainly required. “When you look at the numbers we’re talking about in LA County -- 215 voters out of 4.7 million registered voters in LA -- you’re talking about an error rate that’s .0000453 percent.” If you don't look for it, how can you be sure how often it occurs? Especially when the policy is to actively deny it happens at all. Remember when they installed red light cameras... then citations increased by 1000%.... Edited May 12, 2020 by unbillievable
Motorin' Posted May 12, 2020 Posted May 12, 2020 Just now, unbillievable said: If you don't look for it, how can you be sure how often it occurs? Remember when they installed red light cameras... then citations increased by 1000%.... So the examination of LA county's public voter register and the cross reference with the public death records is the same thing as having no cameras red lights? False example. It would be a good point if the records weren't PUBLIC.
unbillievable Posted May 12, 2020 Posted May 12, 2020 Just now, Motorin' said: So the examination of LA county's public voter register and the cross reference with the public death records is the same thing as having no cameras red lights? False example. It would be a good point if the records weren't PUBLIC. Not if you're using records that are not updated and refuse to verify the voter's identity. Even with faulty records, with the intent to hide ensure privacy, they still found voter fraud being committed. It indicates that it's just the tip of the iceberg. Also, you're using the same EXCUSE that it doesn't happen enough to matter, after your initial assumption that it doesn't happen at all was easily proven false. Answer honestly, how much FRAUD is an acceptable amount... to allow something as simple as asking for ID's?
Recommended Posts