Deranged Rhino Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 2 minutes ago, ~Kostabi~ said: Says the stable genius of PPP gotcha. lol Know what the fool does when he hears the truth? He laughs. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 25 minutes ago, ~Kostabi~ said: what a cute pithy comment. Why not ask service people what THEY think about their commander and chief saying something like that about an ex service member POW. They are who matter in this discussion not a keyboard warrior judgmental know it all like yourself. 22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I have. Many times. They agree with him because, unlike you, they know exactly who No Name was and what he stood for. You don't. Because you'd rather keep to proper decorum than learn the truth. Classic. ? 1
SectionC3 Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 1 hour ago, Doc said: If people want to kill mass numbers of other people, there are ways to go about it without guns. And I don't know if I think anyone really needs even a semi-automatic gun and I think that background checks should be done, but won't root-out everyone. I'm just wondering how far we should go to keep society safe? Para 1. Definitely. Certain guns, however, still are an effective, convenient, and frankly preferred method. Para 2. For me, reinstituting assault weapons ban is the way to go. But this is an impossible problem, and I'm not sure it possible to give a great answer.
3rdnlng Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 24 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Know what the fool does when he hears the truth? He laughs. Out loud. Gag me with a spoon. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: Para 2. For me, reinstituting assault weapons ban is the way to go. Re-instituting something that did nothing to stop gun violence is the way to go ... to prevent gun violence. Dynamite logic.
Orlando Buffalo Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 1 hour ago, ~Kostabi~ said: what a cute pithy comment. Why not ask service people what THEY think about their commander and chief saying something like that about an ex service member POW. They are who matter in this discussion not a keyboard warrior judgmental know it all like yourself. From this comment I feel you think the Military service members do not support our president. I am wondering why you think they do not? 1
Deranged Rhino Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 6 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said: From this comment I feel you think the Military service members do not support our president. I am wondering why you think they do not? Because he gets his information from the media rather than actual sources. 1
Q-baby! Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Because he gets his information from the media rather than actual sources. Like Twitter?
SectionC3 Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 31 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Re-instituting something that did nothing to stop gun violence is the way to go ... to prevent gun violence. Dynamite logic. There you go again with your fake news and hoaxes. No facts or data to support your position.
3rdnlng Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: There you go again with your fake news and hoaxes. No facts or data to support your position. Out of curiosity, what is your profession if you don't mind?
Deranged Rhino Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 13 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: There you go again with your fake news and hoaxes. No facts or data to support your position. The assault weapon ban did not end gun violence in any statistically significant manner. You're wrong. Again. All the way. But please, tell us how you want to go back to old policies, which didn't work, to combat your fear of an inanimate object.
SectionC3 Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 (edited) 16 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Out of curiosity, what is your profession if you don't mind? Attorney and writer. The law stuff pays better than the other endeavors. Quite honestly I'm here because I miss the give and take of the profession and I'm trying to cut my teeth arguing with a different group of people with different insights and compasses than I would normally spar with. I guess that's why I came here in the first place yesterday. Today it's more amusement than anything else. So yeah, you're kind of guinea pigs. But it's harder to argue with people who are unpredictable, and that's what's happened here. So I'm learning a lot and it's been an instructive couple of days. Maybe I'll be better for the investment of time. At least that was the idea. Gotta make the best of a lousy situation and try to learn something. 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: The assault weapon ban did not end gun violence in any statistically significant manner. You're wrong. Again. All the way. But please, tell us how you want to go back to old policies, which didn't work, to combat your fear of an inanimate object. More fakey newsy here. It should be easy to prove that I'm wrong. But apparently you'd rather try to perpetrate a hoax here. Edited April 20, 2020 by SectionC3
Deranged Rhino Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: Attorney and writer. The law stuff pays better than the other endeavors. More fakey newsy here. It should be easy to prove that I'm wrong. But apparently you'd rather try to perpetrate a hoax here. JA reborn. 1
SectionC3 Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: JA reborn. Hoax.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 Still running from logic. Still pushing fear. Still protecting those who are enemies of humanity because he's too stupid and programmed to know better. 2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: More fakey newsy here. It should be easy to prove that I'm wrong. But apparently you'd rather try to perpetrate a hoax here. Oops. From the ultra right leaning LA Times no less. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-stokes-assault-weapon-ban-20180301-story.html Again, keep pushing ignorance and fear of an inanimate object as if you're the smartest guy in the room. Then run away from your words, change screen names (again) and try it all again. Sad person, who's pushing the enemy's talking points without knowing it because he'd rather have his feelings validated than grapple with the truth.
SectionC3 Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Still running from logic. Still pushing fear. Still protecting those who are enemies of humanity because he's too stupid and programmed to know better. Oops. From the ultra right leaning LA Times no less. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-stokes-assault-weapon-ban-20180301-story.html Again, keep pushing ignorance and fear of an inanimate object as if you're the smartest guy in the room. Then run away from your words, change screen names (again) and try it all again. Sad person, who's pushing the enemy's talking points without knowing it because he'd rather have his feelings validated than grapple with the truth. I can conceive of no conclusion other than you are a liberal MSM plant sent here to confuse the world. That is the only possible explanation for all of this.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 Just now, SectionC3 said: I can conceive of no conclusion other than you are a liberal MSM plant sent here to confuse the world. That is the only possible explanation for all of this. Note the JA tactic: Can't refute the evidence -- so change the topic to the absurd. Keep protecting those monsters who prey on children, JA. You're doing a service to your masters. (See, I can do it too) 1
SectionC3 Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Note the JA tactic: Can't refute the evidence -- so change the topic to the absurd. Keep protecting those monsters who prey on children, JA. You're doing a service to your masters. There you go again with your hoaxes. I have to say your imagination is extremely impressive. 7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Still running from logic. Still pushing fear. Still protecting those who are enemies of humanity because he's too stupid and programmed to know better. Oops. From the ultra right leaning LA Times no less. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-stokes-assault-weapon-ban-20180301-story.html Again, keep pushing ignorance and fear of an inanimate object as if you're the smartest guy in the room. Then run away from your words, change screen names (again) and try it all again. Sad person, who's pushing the enemy's talking points without knowing it because he'd rather have his feelings validated than grapple with the truth. You quoted an op-ed, by the way. Might want to find a study, at which point I could be convinced to pay attention.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 Such a coward. Got (multiple) former handles run off for his blisteringly dishonest manner of discussion, and is back again to wow us all with his love of the establishment and hatred of thinking for one's self. The King of the asshats returns. Until he runs away (again) after being embarrassed. 1
SectionC3 Posted April 20, 2020 Posted April 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Such a coward. Got (multiple) former handles run off for his blisteringly dishonest manner of discussion, and is back again to wow us all with his love of the establishment and hatred of thinking for one's self. The King of the asshats returns. Until he runs away (again) after being embarrassed. Not sure what you're talking about. But it's probably more fake news or fake logic. (for what it's worth, you're wrong about the multiple handles and all of the other stuff) 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Such a coward. Got (multiple) former handles run off for his blisteringly dishonest manner of discussion, and is back again to wow us all with his love of the establishment and hatred of thinking for one's self. The King of the asshats returns. Until he runs away (again) after being embarrassed. Still no study, though, right? Gonna rest on the op-ed?
Recommended Posts