Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:


That’s a very specific post. The fact you brush it off only proves my point. 
 

Keep on being afraid of a tool. You’re showing how brave you are, section. :lol: 

 

There you go again.  More fake logic.  This is what you said: 

 

"Your understanding of freedom, liberty, and what it cost to secure them is woefully shallow. You’re a victim of fear, and deeply programmed by those who wish to keep you subservient and dumb."

 

You never explained how my understanding is deficient, why I am a victim of fear, and how I am deeply programmed.  

 

If you have non-fake logic, or non-fake news in this respect, please let me know. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Warren Zevon said:

 

I'd put on my Tom Bauerle approved invisibility cloak, walk to the door, grab the machete, sneak up from behind and hack away. C'mon man!

That is exactly what you don't want to do if you don't want to get charged with some degree of murder.

Posted
1 minute ago, Warren Zevon said:

 

I'd put on my Tom Bauerle approved invisibility cloak, walk to the door, grab the machete, sneak up from behind and hack away. C'mon man!

Yep, typical response to someone living in a fairyland. Are you saying criminals don't have guns?

Posted
Just now, 3rdnlng said:

That is exactly what you don't want to do if you don't want to get charged with some degree of murder.

 

Umm.. I would never take the invisibility cloak off. 

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

 

There you go again.  More fake logic.  This is what you said: 

 

"Your understanding of freedom, liberty, and what it cost to secure them is woefully shallow. You’re a victim of fear, and deeply programmed by those who wish to keep you subservient and dumb."

 

You never explained how my understanding is deficient, why I am a victim of fear, and how I am deeply programmed.  

 

If you have non-fake logic, or non-fake news in this respect, please let me know. 

 

it's all it does

Posted
Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

There you go again.  More fake logic.  This is what you said: 

 

"Your understanding of freedom, liberty, and what it cost to secure them is woefully shallow. You’re a victim of fear, and deeply programmed by those who wish to keep you subservient and dumb."

 

You never explained how my understanding is deficient, why I am a victim of fear, and how I am deeply programmed.  

 

If you have non-fake logic, or non-fake news in this respect, please let me know. 


You’re afraid of opening too soon — based on your morning posting of hysterics. 
 

You’re afraid of an inanimate object, a gun, because you’ve been programmed to be so. 
 

And you’ve spent (now) two days railing against guns while using home invasions as a reason to show why they’re unnecessary — which misses the point of the second amendment entirely (because your understanding of liberty, freedom, and what it takes to secure them is woefully shallow).

 

Gee. It’s not like we JUST lived through an attempted back door coup of our OWN government’s making, and are, right now, living in a time when governors are stripping rights away from us under the promise of “security”. 
 

A smarter person, one not a victim of fear and MSM brainwashing, would understand now isn’t the time to make the case you’re trying to make because it’s NEVER looked so silly and shallow. 
 

But of course you’re just marching to the tune you’ve been programmed with without even realizing it... 

 

Sad way to live. But hilarious of you to share your lack of courage, reason, and logic with the class. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Gary M said:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use

 

Estimates over the number of defensive gun uses vary wildly, depending on the study's definition of a defensive gun use, survey design, country, population, criteria, time-period studied, and other factors. Low-end estimates are in the range of 55,000 to 80,000 incidents per year, while high end estimates reach 4.7 million per year. Discussion over the number and nature of DGU and the implications to gun control policy came to a head in the late 1990s

 

 

 

Honest question: is that a domestic or international statistic?

Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:


You’re afraid of opening too soon — based on your morning posting of hysterics. 
 

You’re afraid of an inanimate object, a gun, because you’ve been programmed to be so. 
 

And you’ve spent (now) two days railing against guns while using home invasions as a reason to show why they’re unnecessary — which misses the point of the second amendment entirely (because your understanding of liberty, freedom, and what it takes to secure them is woefully shallow).

 

Gee. It’s not like we JUST lived through an attempted back door coup of our OWN government’s making, and are, right now, living in a time when governors are stripping rights away from us under the promise of “security”. 
 

A smarter person, one not a victim of fear and MSM brainwashing, would understand now isn’t the time to make the case you’re trying to make because it’s NEVER looked so silly and shallow. 
 

But of course you’re just marching to the tune you’ve been programmed with without even realizing it... 

 

Sad way to live. But hilarious of you to share your lack of courage, reason, and logic with the class. 

 

Sounds like a lot of keyboard psychology to me.  Fake analysis and fake logic from another source of fake news.  Sad!

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

Sounds like a lot of keyboard psychology to me.  Fake analysis and fake logic from another source of fake news.  Sad!


It’s spot on. And you know it. Hence this pathetic response. Go back to hiding under the bed. Let the adults of the world take care of you (as always). 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, westside2 said:

Yep, typical response to someone living in a fairyland. Are you saying criminals don't have guns?

 

Actually, the original point was that for 3,281,999 people out of 3,282,000 US citizens, there never will be a criminal who would otherwise kill you in a burglary.

Posted
Just now, Gene Frenkle said:

 

Actually, the original point was that for 3,281,999 people out of 3,282,000 US citizens, there never will be a criminal who would otherwise kill you in a burglary.

Link to your numbers?

Posted
Just now, SectionC3 said:

“I gave up on Deranged Rhino (a really nice guy) long ago, as have many others. People are dropping off like flies!”


You just got embarrassed. I’ll keep embarrassing you if you wish — or you can keep posting weak as ***** like this and keep embarrassing yourself. The choice is yours. 
 

Go on. Think you’re winning. :lol: 

Posted
Just now, SectionC3 said:

“I gave up on Deranged Rhino (a really nice guy) long ago, as have many others. People are dropping off like flies!”

 

"His Twitter views are decreasing. Terrible ratings. All time low. Sad"

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:


It’s spot on. And you know it. Hence this pathetic response. Go back to hiding under the bed. Let the adults of the world take care of you (as always). 

 

Hoax.  I think you're actually part of the liberal, lamestream media and are just trying to confuse everyone.  You're a "terrible" poster and you're "never going to make it."

Posted
Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

Hoax.  I think you're actually part of the liberal, lamestream media and are just trying to confuse everyone.  You're a "terrible" poster and you're "never going to make it."

 

He'll be the first to let you know he is a liberal. Believe it.

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:


You just got embarrassed. I’ll keep embarrassing you if you wish — or you can keep posting weak as ***** like this and keep embarrassing yourself. The choice is yours. 
 

Go on. Think you’re winning. :lol: 

 

That was "nasty."  Sad!

Posted
5 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Honest question: is that a domestic or international statistic?

 

 

I know the Kleck and Lott studies used FBI data, so that would be domestic only.

Posted
1 minute ago, Warren Zevon said:

 

"His Twitter views are decreasing. Terrible ratings. All time low. Sad"

Kind of like your Queen Hillary. So sad to see her fall from grace. Hey! Look on the brightside, you have biden now! Oh........he won't remember anything you tell him. So sad.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said:

 

Umm.. I would never take the invisibility cloak off. 

 

 

This is what you figure is an appropriate response? Your approach would get you put in jail. You lose an argument so you try to clown yourself out of the discussion? 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...