chris heff Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 I couldn’t figure out a link, it is in the NFL App. I guess what he is attempting to do is rank each QB based on ability and contract cost. Not sure what relevance that has. He sure hates Josh Allen, ranks him 23, right after Gardner Minshew. 1 1
Mango Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 2 minutes ago, chris heff said: I couldn’t figure out a link, it is in the NFL App. I guess what he is attempting to do is rank each QB based on ability and contract cost. Not sure what relevance that has. He sure hates Josh Allen, ranks him 23, right after Gardner Minshew. Literally the first link on google. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001108258/article/nfl-qb-value-rankings-who-do-you-want-most-at-current-cost 3 1
GunnerBill Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 See I think Josh is at least half a dozen places too low on this list.
DFT Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 Greg Rosenthal’s reasoning for some of these rankings is just adorable...
Don Otreply Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 1 minute ago, DFT said: Greg Rosenthal’s reasoning for some of these rankings is just adorable... does he work for PFF? 2
DFT Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 Just now, Don Otreply said: does he work for PFF? He works for mighty taco’s B-team. 1 1 1
whatdrought Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 Rosenthal is a Patriots fan who is very anti Bills. He’s also kinda an arrogant D-bag. 8
bigK14094 Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 Bills won't quit on Josh unless he totally craters. He will be a pro...a great on imho.
gjv001 Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 Rosenthal must be the illegitimate child to an extremely influencial person at NFL.com. How else could this talentless evaluator of NFL players have a job there.
chris heff Posted April 3, 2020 Author Posted April 3, 2020 35 minutes ago, Mango said: Literally the first link on google. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001108258/article/nfl-qb-value-rankings-who-do-you-want-most-at-current-cost Ha, I was trying to send a link from the app. 1
Dopey Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 I would put Josh ahead of the following: Carr - Contract and inconsistent Big Ben - Contract and injury Goff - Contract and inconsistent Stafford - Contract and injury Baker - Had an off year and just not showing he's a leader That would put him at 17. I have him tied with Darnold. 2 1
Just Joshin' Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 Minshew's mom would not take him over Allen if those were the two choices. 1 1 1
SirAndrew Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 Josh Allen has a chance to prove himself big time this season, no need to be all hurt over a low ranking. 4 1
chris heff Posted April 3, 2020 Author Posted April 3, 2020 1 minute ago, SirAndrew said: Josh Allen has a chance to prove himself big time this season, no need to be all hurt over a low ranking. Wasn’t hurt at all. I found the premise to be absurd regardless of Allen’s ranking. You can rank a player on ability, you can rank contract value, but what is the point of merging those two things?
Augie Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 3 minutes ago, SirAndrew said: Josh Allen has a chance to prove himself big time this season, no need to be all hurt over a low ranking. One might argue that Josh could use this as fuel to drive him, but they’d be wrong, IMO. I think Josh is already fully self-driven and I think this would be like water off a duck. I hope I come to love the player as much as the guy! 2
GreggTX Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 23rd sounds about right. His inaccuracy, fumbling, inability to handle pressure, etc always get a free pass from his admirers. I'm just hoping he can get it together finally in 2020. 5 2 1
jletha Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 I care less that Josh is that low than Baker being that high. 10?? Given last years results I don't think you can really separate Josh, Baker or Darnold all that much. To have him at 10 is ridiculous. 5 minutes ago, GreggTX said: 23rd sounds about right. His inaccuracy, fumbling, inability to handle pressure, etc always get a free pass from his admirers. I'm just hoping he can get it together finally in 2020. Yea 23 is fine. I think the difference between 23 and 18 on any of these lists is very narrow. 4 1
SirAndrew Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 2 minutes ago, chris heff said: Wasn’t hurt at all. I found the premise to be absurd regardless of Allen’s ranking. You can rank a player on ability, you can rank contract value, but what is the point of merging those two things? I get that, and thanks for posting the link because I like these type of articles. I just meant that some people tend to overreact to these type of things. I really like Allen’s potential, but I wouldn’t expect him ranked higher than 20 something by any non-Bills fan. If he progresses the way he should, there’s no way he won’t move up in these type of rankings, even if the writer isn’t great. 1
Allen2Moulds Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 Does he watch football, and if he does, he has no idea what to look at, and doesn't understand the game. 1
LABILLBACKER Posted April 3, 2020 Posted April 3, 2020 15 minutes ago, Dopey said: I would put Josh ahead of the following: Carr - Contract and inconsistent Big Ben - Contract and injury Goff - Contract and inconsistent Stafford - Contract and injury Baker - Had an off year and just not showing he's a leader That would put him at 17. I have him tied with Darnold. ....and Tannehill, I would rank him based on last year's improvements somewhere in the 16-17 range. I agree he should be side by side with Darnold. 1
Recommended Posts