Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Bangarang said:

I wouldn’t mind taking a WR in the 2nd and letting him develop for a few years to eventually take over for Brown or Beasley. 

I wouldn't mind it either,......that's if we address the Tackle and RB and TE  positions in FA first.

Posted
54 minutes ago, Formerly Allan in MD said:

Of course, we desperately need wide receivers. 

 

What nonsense.  Please shut this down.

Settle down cowboy. 

Posted

Claypool is big and physical and goes after the ball. He is also a special teams demon. Very athletic. Bill's have scouted him a lot but so have other teams. In Colts backyard and they need a wr.

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, turftoe said:

Claypool is big and physical and goes after the ball. He is also a special teams demon. Very athletic. Bill's have scouted him a lot but so have other teams. In Colts backyard and they need a wr.

Who knows where they go.  They spent a high pick on Campbell last year.  I dont think you bring in Rivers and go young all around him.

Edited by Mat68
Posted
2 hours ago, DCOrange said:

I definitely would not trade up for a WR after getting Diggs. If Mims is there at 54, I’d be happy to take him there

 

Agreed.  We're strong enough at WR that it wouldn't make much sense to trade up, barring unforeseen circumstances like Jeudy or Lamb falling out of the 1st.  Some of our favorite WR prospects will fall to the later rounds; it happens every spring.

 

Posted

Would prefer one of the top 4 backs if they fall. Dobbins is a guy I really like. After trading for Diggs I don’t think they go wideout til late 3rd via a trade up or the 4th.

×
×
  • Create New...