Koko78 Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 9 hours ago, Kevbeau said: Not to mention the logic on this Merry-Go-Round of Stupid...the hypothetical impeachment vote would eventually be put in front of the same body that would vote on the Justice confirmation. So the Senate has to vote on impeachment to stop themselves from voting on the nominee. Who comes up with this *****? They're hoping that any impeachment trial would be strung along until January 4th, when the new Congress is sworn in (praying that the Democrats have a Senate majority.) It's a stupid gambit. McConnell just has to get the Senate to pass trial rules that the House gets 1 hour to present their case, followed by an immediate vote to remove Trump, followed by an immediate vote to confirm the nominee. 2
B-Man Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 Nancy is in panic mode. Pelosi confuses some during interview on SCOTUS fight by David Aaro Original Article House Speaker Nancy Pelosi left some viewers scratching their heads after what seemed like a brief communication issue during a Sunday morning news show. During an interview on ABC News’ “This Week,” Pelosi, D-Calif., was asked whether she and House Democrats would move to impeach President Trump in an effort to stop his U.S. Supreme Court pick from being confirmed to the bench -- following the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. “We have our options. We have arrows in our quiver that I’m not about to discuss right now, but the fact is we have a big challenge in our country,” Pelosi said. 1
B-Man Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 USEFUL IDIOT? FELLOW TRAVELER? ON THE PAYROLL? YOU MAKE THE CALL! Pelosi Stonewalls Bill That Would Crack Down on Chinese Influence in U.S.
Alaska Darin Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 10 hours ago, Kevbeau said: Not to mention the logic on this Merry-Go-Round of Stupid...the hypothetical impeachment vote would eventually be put in front of the same body that would vote on the Justice confirmation. So the Senate has to vote on impeachment to stop themselves from voting on the nominee. Who comes up with this *****? Desperate, incompetent people who are getting beat at the game they made the rules to. 3
Unforgiven Posted September 23, 2020 Posted September 23, 2020 On 9/22/2020 at 6:52 PM, Buffalo_Gal said: in·sane /inˈsān/ in a state of mind which prevents normal perception, behavior, or social interaction; seriously mentally ill.
Foxx Posted September 24, 2020 Posted September 24, 2020 On 9/21/2020 at 9:23 AM, Koko78 said: They're hoping that any impeachment trial would be strung along until January 4th, when the new Congress is sworn in (praying that the Democrats have a Senate majority.) It's a stupid gambit. McConnell just has to get the Senate to pass trial rules that the House gets 1 hour to present their case, followed by an immediate vote to remove Trump, followed by an immediate vote to confirm the nominee. i could be wrong but i believe the Senate is under no obligation to hear an impeachment case. it is my understanding that they could just vote to table it.
Koko78 Posted September 24, 2020 Posted September 24, 2020 2 hours ago, Foxx said: i could be wrong but i believe the Senate is under no obligation to hear an impeachment case. it is my understanding that they could just vote to table it. I think that they are Constitutionally required to have some sort of quick return on a trial, even if they halfass it. Both sides of the aisle were pretty clear, during the last impeachment joke, that the Senate had a Constitutional duty to set aside everything else to conduct some sort of trial. Of course, there is no set procedure for how they conduct that trial, but I don't believe tabling it is an option. They can do an immediate vote to dismiss the allegations, but they still have to do something. 1
Taro T Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 46 minutes ago, B-Man said: He could've just read the speech while it was still daylight. It's not like knowing who 45 chose changed the speech in any substantial manner. 2
Joe Miner Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 12 hours ago, B-Man said: The mythical place of eternal life we are to mock ACB for believing in also buried RGB? Geez, didn’t realize heaven had gotten so rough.
Alaska Darin Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 1 hour ago, Joe Miner said: The mythical place of eternal life we are to mock ACB for believing in also buried RGB? Geez, didn’t realize heaven had gotten so rough. Mythology is only cool when the libs use it. Otherwise it's blasphemy and "anti-science." Get back to baby killing, stat!
BillStime Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said: Mythology is only cool when the libs use it. Otherwise it's blasphemy and "anti-science." Get back to baby killing, stat!
Chef Jim Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 3 minutes ago, BillStime said: @Alaska Darin You’re a Trump supporter? Huh you’ve changed since you’ve been away. But seriously what on God’s green earth does his post have to do with Trump. Here let me answer for you. NOTHING!!!
Alaska Darin Posted September 27, 2020 Posted September 27, 2020 36 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: @Alaska Darin You’re a Trump supporter? Huh you’ve changed since you’ve been away. But seriously what on God’s green earth does his post have to do with Trump. Here let me answer for you. NOTHING!!! No reason to feed the stupid. He/she/it/they just wants the attention his/her/its/ their family never gave them. 2
B-Man Posted September 28, 2020 Posted September 28, 2020 ‘It’s YOUR tax code!’ Nancy ‘Let Them Eat Ice Cream’ Pelosi shrieking about Trump’s ‘disdain for working families’ fails HILARIOUSLY
Recommended Posts