Jump to content

If the Bills HAD to add one which would you pick?  

140 members have voted

  1. 1. Which FA RB for the Bills

    • Devonta Freeman
      23
    • Carlos Hyde
      49
    • Lamar Miller
      8


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

The Bills have limited cap space remaining for 2020. They can sign someone like Gordon but the cap space has dried up for the most part.

 

With Gurley now off the board I would lean towards Hyde. He’s the right combination of cost and effectiveness. He’s coming off a nice year.

 

That does seem more probable and we haven't heard his name mentioned ;)

 

Except on the board  ;)

Posted
3 minutes ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

I don't understand why Gordon is unrealistic. The Bills have one of the best cap situations in the league and a need for that type of player at RB. Sometimes it feels like the mentality is that the Bills have less money than everyone else.

 

The question is, do you pay starter money to a rotational RB or split that outlay by signing a lower-priced RB AND adding another quality CB, OL, or WR?   

 

Gordon would be a good option if you wanted to give him 16-18 carries and 3-4 passes a game (i.e., a bell cow).   But he's going to get half of that here, splitting time with Singletary. 

 

If we put some of that salary toward a Kevin Johnson-type quality depth CB or a Daryl Williams-type ROT, you kill two birds with one stone, IMO...

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I chose Hyde. He would be the most value choice while still being fairly effective. And I don't think signing him would prevent drafting another RB if someone they really like slips down on draft day. 

 

Imagine Singletary/Akers/Hyde ?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Lurker said:

 

The question is, do you pay starter money to a rotational RB or split that outlay by signing a lower-priced RB AND adding another quality CB, OL, or WR?   

 

Gordon would be a good option if you wanted to give him 16-18 carries and 3-4 passes a game (i.e., a bell cow).   But he's going to get half of that here, splitting time with Singletary. 

 

If we put some of that salary toward a Kevin Johnson-type quality depth CB or a Daryl Williams-type ROT, you kill two birds with one stone, IMO...

 

Johnson signed with Cleveland yesterday I think its 3.5m for 1 year

Posted

I chose Hyde merely due to how I would think a second Vet RB would be used, presuming Yeldon stays on team and the Bills Draft another Rookie RB.

Posted
10 minutes ago, JMF2006 said:

 

Johnson signed with Cleveland yesterday I think its 3.5m for 1 year

 

I know.  I said Kevin Johnson-type.   

 

That $3.5 million he got could have kept him here and left $3.5 million for a RB, rather than giving Gordon the whole $7 million he'll probably get somewhere (maybe even here)...    

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Freeman on a cheaper 1yr prove-it deal.

 

Gordon is the best player on the list but will be the most expensive and I aint trying to spend that on a RB.

 

edit: I would be just as happy with Hyde too. My point is to not overspend at RB, which is what we'd be doing with Gordon.

Edited by DrDawkinstein
Posted

I do like Miller. Always have. But I do think he is coming off a ACL or something. 
 

Gordon is the best player on the list, but in terms of being a complimentary piece, Hyde makes the most sense. 
 

Some more under the radar ideas:
 

Deandre Washington of the Raiders was a good piece for them when Jacobs was injured last year. He has some breakaway speed and has some pass catching ability out of the backfield. Should come quite cheap. 
 

Our old friend Jonathan Williams could make sense. He flashed with the Colts last year. He has some size and speed. I do think he was originally cut in 2017 because he was a bad fit in the Rick Dennison system. I do think he’d fit better now. 
 

Matt Breida got a second round tender, but if a team wanted to pursue him, they could try to negotiate different compensation with the Niners. Maybe a 4th?

 

Finally Kenyan Drake got the old Charles Clay Transition tag. With the Cardinals in a place where they need to get Deandre Hopkins a new contract, still need to make additions to their offensive line, and have about half our cap space, Beane could design a heavily front loaded contract that the Cards might struggle to match. Though if you pursue Drake, he becomes your starter and Singletary is the complimentary back. To me, he is the best player available at the position outside of Derrick Henry (who isn’t really available)
 

 

Posted

I still don’t get why people want a veteran rb so bad.  It is the easiest position to transition from college to the nfl.  There are guys in the draft with less miles, more explosive, and much cheaper to get.  
 

and for the record, I would have paid Gurley for a year.  He is special, though his knees aren’t.  The rest of the choices are meh.

Posted

I pick Freeman...

1) He's almost always shared carries - with Tevin Coleman a lot in ATL

2) He's known as an example type leader and worker

3) He had 59 catches last year and over 1000 All Purpose Yards -- got back to being productive after 2 years of major injuries.

 

Negatives are ball security -- he tends to fumble once every 90 carries or so -- but they seem to come at the worst time...and his ypc declined greatly last year..

 

https://www.atlantafalcons.com/news/devonta-freeman-ready-to-leave-dark-times-behind-show-off-stronger-version-of-hi

Posted (edited)

Out of these options, Hyde. Will be 30 for this season; he’s a vet who just had 1,000 yards at 4.4 YPC. 
 

10 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

I still don’t get why people want a veteran rb so bad.  It is the easiest position to transition from college to the nfl.  There are guys in the draft with less miles, more explosive, and much cheaper to get.  
 

and for the record, I would have paid Gurley for a year.  He is special, though his knees aren’t.  The rest of the choices are meh.


I’d like a vet and a draft pick in rounds 4-6. Experience matters especially with situational football. 

Edited by JohnBonhamRocks
Posted

I chose Hyde. 

 

I think he will cost has as much as Gordon, hes a bigger back that is a banger which we could use. 

 

Adding Hyde probably wouldn't preclude us from drafting one which I really want us to do

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

I still don’t get why people want a veteran rb so bad.  It is the easiest position to transition from college to the nfl.  There are guys in the draft with less miles, more explosive, and much cheaper to get.  
 

and for the record, I would have paid Gurley for a year.  He is special, though his knees aren’t.  The rest of the choices are meh.

 

I'm definitely not banging the table for a free agent RB. But to answer your question, I think it's mainly two things (at least from my perspective):

  1. We know McBeane generally prefers having a veteran in the room/prefers filling in needs in free agency, so I think it's just assumed we'll pick one up.
  2. Transitioning from college to the NFL isn't easy as far as being a 3rd down back goes. That, to me, is what we should be trying to fix in free agency.

Gordon would help in that regard. So would someone like Dion Lewis, Chris Thompson, Buck Allen, Devontae Booker, Bilal Powell etc.

Edited by DCOrange
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, DCOrange said:

 

I'm definitely not banging the table for a free agent RB. But to answer your question, I think it's mainly two things (at least from my perspective):

  1. We know McBeane generally prefers having a veteran in the room/prefers filling in needs in free agency, so I think it's just assumed we'll pick one up.
  2. Transitioning from college to the NFL isn't easy as far as being a 3rd down back goes. That, to me, is what we should be trying to fix in free agency.

Gordon would help in that regard. So would someone like Dion Lewis, Chris Thompson, Buck Allen, Devontae Booker, Bilal Powell etc.

Good point about the 3rd down role.  Imo, you get dion Lewis and then draft a physical rb in the draft. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

Good point about the 3rd down role.  Imo, you get dion Lewis and then draft a physical rb in the draft. 

Yeah, if the money is anything crazy, I would prefer to just go with the cheaper option of a guy like Dion (though I think he in particular will have multiple suitors that might make more sense). If it's a moderate 1-2 year deal though, I'd be pretty tempted by a guy like Gordon just because he can be the 3rd down guy while also being a productive runner in his own right. Really all depends on the price IMO.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:

I would pick Hyde.. combination of fit with Singletary and likely cost..

I went with Hyde also.  It was for the above plus an unhappy Gordon will not be a productive Gordon.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, MrEpsYtown said:

Matt Breida got a second round tender, but if a team wanted to pursue him, they could try to negotiate different compensation with the Niners. Maybe a 4th?

This or just go with a draft pick.

×
×
  • Create New...