sunshynman Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 (edited) He has been bad lately. Better Knowledge possibly? At least more situational play. And should not be a threat for people wanting him to play. https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/03/19/broncos-waive-joe-flacco/ Edited March 19, 2020 by sunshynman typo 1 1
C.Biscuit97 Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 Honestly, this is probably the best case backup. Not good enough anymore to be a threat (Unlike Winston and Cam) but still much better than Barkley and has won a lot of games in this league. It actually makes too much sense to happen. 12 1
DJB Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 (edited) No!!!! There is more to being an NFL backup than simply being the next man up. These guys spend hours together breaking down film and working out together. It's an important relationship. We have a young ascending but not yet established QB. Bringing in a big name QB only puts more pressure on Josh and he doesn't need that. People need to stop making a thread everytime they think of some sort of backup that should be added to the Bills . Think first . Edited March 19, 2020 by DJB 6 1 2
DFT Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 (edited) “My God, No!” Sincerely signed, Every fantasy owner who used a Bronco in 2019. Edited March 19, 2020 by DFT 5
sunshynman Posted March 19, 2020 Author Posted March 19, 2020 Just now, C.Biscuit97 said: Honestly, this is probably the best case backup. Not good enough anymore to be a threat (Unlike Winston and Cam) but still much better than Barkley and has won a lot of games in this league. It actually makes too much sense to happen. He feel off the cliff fast. But If he embraces the backup role, he could help Josh. And He could possibly win you some games in a pinch. 1
Mountain Man Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 We have one of the best backup QB situations in the league, why are people obsessed with changing it? Barkley is cheap, a great locker room guy who supports Josh Allen, good enough to survive a few games and is accepting of his role. 2 2
sunshynman Posted March 19, 2020 Author Posted March 19, 2020 1 minute ago, Mountain Man said: We have one of the best backup QB situations in the league, why are people obsessed with changing it? Barkley is cheap, a great locker room guy who supports Josh Allen, good enough to survive a few games and is accepting of his role. He's great for the locker room. But suspect in winning games that Josh is out. 5
WMDman Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 I guess im in the minority but I still like Barkley.... 10 2
Mountain Man Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 Just now, WMDman said: I guess im in the minority but I still like Barkley.... Nope, I suspect yours is the majority opinion. I'd be interested to hear if anyone could name 5 back up situations that are clearly better, excluding competitions like Chicago
sunshynman Posted March 19, 2020 Author Posted March 19, 2020 (edited) 3 minutes ago, WMDman said: I guess im in the minority but I still like Barkley.... I don't dislike Barkley. But I wouldn't say he is our Frank Reich to our Kelly. Edited March 19, 2020 by sunshynman typo
BuffaloBills1998 Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 (edited) This guy is more done than Rivers and Brady combined. 1 hit wonder after the Super Bowl. Plus he’s not a team leader and is probably going to command more money than we’re paying Barkley 10 minutes ago, sunshynman said: I don't dislike Barkley. But I wouldn't say he is our Frank Reich to our Kelly. Were never gonna have another Reich , the only one closest to him, at least to me was Matt Moore Edited March 19, 2020 by BuffaloBills1998 1 1
Numark3 Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 (edited) 11 minutes ago, sunshynman said: I don't dislike Barkley. But I wouldn't say he is our Frank Reich to our Kelly. which is a ridiculous standard to expect (not saying you are!) Edited March 19, 2020 by Crayola64 1
section122 Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 27 minutes ago, C.Biscuit97 said: Honestly, this is probably the best case backup. Not good enough anymore to be a threat (Unlike Winston and Cam) but still much better than Barkley and has won a lot of games in this league. It actually makes too much sense to happen. I disagree completely. He is washed. No reaaon to bring him in at all. 1
ny33 Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 17 minutes ago, Mountain Man said: We have one of the best backup QB situations in the league, why are people obsessed with changing it? Barkley is cheap, a great locker room guy who supports Josh Allen, good enough to survive a few games and is accepting of his role. Barkley really isn’t very good on the field, but I agree with the rest. 1
Mc1320 Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 I live in Baltimore and would expect Flacco to retire, I don’t see him being a journeyman backup. He has his ring and boatloads of cash as a result of his Super Bowl run. Plus Scam Newton and Winston would probable be first choices for teams looking for backups to push their current starters. 2
Ya Digg? Posted March 19, 2020 Posted March 19, 2020 I would take him as the back up. To me it comes down to if Josh goes down, who do you have more faith in winning a couple of games-Flacco or Barkley. Personally I would have a lot more confidence in Flacco going 2-2 over a 4 game stretch with the weapons the Bills have than Barkley. Watching Barkley in the New England game for me last year was hard. Very likable guy, supports Josh, but I feel Flacco has more talent 1 1
Recommended Posts