Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Probably the best leverage we could have had against China on the economic side was through the Trans-Pacific Partnership that Obama negotiated.

Thanks to Bernie Sanders on the left (with Hillary being forced to join him in opposing it) and Trump on the right, we pulled out of the agreement.

And just to clear up a common misconception: the TPP did NOT include China. It would have allowed the USA and non-Chinese countries to expand trade among themselves, cutting China out.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 1/7/2021 at 9:27 PM, TBBills said:

Trump allowed China to gain this power. 

Expand  

 

Actually it was the Rs and the Ds doing backroom deals. China grew huge under Clinton, Bush and Obama. Trump was the only president to consider them an actual problem (to his credit). 

 

Oh and your quote is not how countries actually work unless you believe in WW3. 

 

Read the quote just above mine from Frankish Reich it's very good. 

Posted

So... Parlor nut jobs are back.

 

Is China a threat - yes. Does just about every country in the world leverage their products - yes. Will it take time and a variety of leverage to counter them - yes. Was Trump tough on China - maybe.

 

For years the US has been positioning themselves and their allies to make a push back on China, part of the reasoning around the TPP was to provide alternatives to Chinese-dominated trade and supply chain options. Of course, Don the Con could not stand that effort because it was started by Obama so he sank it. Then launched a trade war with few if any partnerships and little or no global leverage.

 

I am not against a tougher stance on China - Australia was the first to sound the alarm on their more aggressive tactics, but I think it is something that has to be well thought out policy-wise, not something you approach half-cocked.

 

 

 

 

Posted
  On 1/11/2021 at 8:29 PM, WideNine said:

So... Parlor nut jobs are back.

 

Is China a threat - yes. Does just about every country in the world leverage their products - yes. Will it take time and a variety of leverage to counter them - yes. Was Trump tough on China - maybe.

 

For years the US has been positioning themselves and their allies to make a push back on China, part of the reasoning around the TPP was to provide alternatives to Chinese-dominated trade and supply chain options. Of course, Don the Con could not stand that effort because it was started by Obama so he sank it. Then launched a trade war with few if any partnerships and little or no global leverage.

 

I am not against a tougher stance on China - Australia was the first to sound the alarm on their more aggressive tactics, but I think it is something that has to be well thought out policy-wise, not something you approach half-cocked.

 

 

 

 

Expand  

They just want a Trumpster to be the one doing it.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

 

 

 

 

 

With a helpful media, the left will just ignore this.

 

There aint a chance in in hell that anyone wakes up Joe to ask him.

 

 

 

 

Posted
  On 3/3/2021 at 4:11 AM, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

With a helpful media, the left will just ignore this.

 

There aint a chance in in hell that anyone wakes up Joe to ask him.

 

 

 

 

Expand  

 

Will Trump close his bank accounts in China? Stop doing business? Will Ivanka return her trademarks?

Posted
  On 3/3/2021 at 4:11 AM, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

With a helpful media, the left will just ignore this.

 

There aint a chance in in hell that anyone wakes up Joe to ask him.

 

 

 

 

Expand  


For a country that has long worked to devise methods of population control, and limiting kids per family, I’m not sure they thought this through. 

Posted
  On 3/4/2021 at 12:24 AM, JaCrispy said:

...Three weeks later...😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣

Expand  

Was just listen to Bloomberg Asia recap on Bloomberg radio and They reported a paraphrased report out of Beijing that the PRC is very pleased with the new administrations soft tone and stance on trade and human rights. That’s coming from them, not some right wing outlet. 
 

take it for what you will. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 3/4/2021 at 1:43 AM, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Was just listen to Bloomberg Asia recap on Bloomberg radio and They reported a paraphrased report out of Beijing that the PRC is very pleased with the new administrations soft tone and stance on trade and human rights. That’s coming from them, not some right wing outlet. 
 

take it for what you will. 

Expand  

 

Shocker!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
  On 3/19/2021 at 7:00 PM, snafu said:
Expand  


Did you see the video with the B word with the purple hair at the American table? Does this regime know nothing at all about Chinese culture?

 

So ***** stupid. 

Posted
  On 3/20/2021 at 3:52 PM, LeviF91 said:


Did you see the video with the B word with the purple hair at the American table? Does this regime know nothing at all about Chinese culture?

 

So ***** stupid. 

Expand  

 

So is Biden too tough on China now or still too soft?

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

All this talk by Republicans of wanting to stand up to China, yet, while China builds towards the 21st century, improving their infrastructure, modernizing and funding the latest technology, Republicans are horrified Biden wants us to try and stay in the race. 

 

Happy to see our country fall behind, thrilled to complain about it and do nothing, these people just spew hate and laugh as we ignore our own country's needs. 

 

Build Back Better! 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

 

 

Former Coca-Cola Employee Convicted of Stealing $120 Million Worth of Trade Secrets to Sell in China

by Cathy He

 

 

A Chinese-born American chemist was found guilty on April 22 for her role in a scheme to steal trade secrets worth an estimated $120 million from American companies for the purpose of setting up a Chinese company that would manufacture the product for the global market. After a 12-day trial, 59-year-old You Xiaorong—also known as Shannon You—of Lansing, Michigan, was convicted of conspiracy to commit trade secret theft, conspiracy to commit economic espionage, possession of stolen trade secrets, economic espionage, and wire fraud, (Snip) While working at two U.S. companies—Coca-Cola in Atlanta, Georgia, and Eastman Chemical Company in Kingsport, Tennessee—she stole trade secrets related to BPA-free (bisphenol-A) coating technology,

 

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/former-coca-cola-employee-convicted-of-stealing-120-million-worth-of-trade-secrets-to-sell-in-china_3788504.html?utm_source=News&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-04-23-3&mktids=13ba7deb8c901a589ed3576b221ad877&est=R6PkaTs4iBPROye8JSv2xS5rhRatpWik6QnnrRzw0Xx9xF3IzZudk2H2zs3%2BEEc%3D

Posted
  On 4/6/2021 at 2:51 PM, Tiberius said:

All this talk by Republicans of wanting to stand up to China, yet, while China builds towards the 21st century, improving their infrastructure, modernizing and funding the latest technology, Republicans are horrified Biden wants us to try and stay in the race. 

 

Happy to see our country fall behind, thrilled to complain about it and do nothing, these people just spew hate and laugh as we ignore our own country's needs. 

 

Build Back Better! 

Expand  


We won’t see a ***** penny of those “infrastructure” dollars. Funding for “infrastructure” without specifics is a very transparent attempt to pay off political debts. 
 

And “staying in the race” while still tossing around H1Bs and other such favors as if they’re chocolate coins at a bar mitzvah is impossible. 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...