Jauronimo Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 15 minutes ago, thebandit27 said: Bruh...you got #scooped ? @FireChans got pantsed by @Reed83HOF 1 2
NewEra Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 I’m very happy we didn’t pay him that kind of money.
Reed83HOF Posted March 16, 2020 Author Posted March 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, Jauronimo said: @FireChans got pantsed by @Reed83HOF 18 minutes ago, thebandit27 said: Bruh...you got #scooped ?
LOVEMESOMEBILLS Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 Just signed. Per NFL Network. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001106396/article/browns-te-austin-hooper-agree-to-terms-on-deal
Virgil Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 4 years, 44 mil. I would have done that in a heartbeat. 3
BarleyNY Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Watkins90 said: That'd be stupid of the Browns with the number of other holes the team has. Nope. TE was a huge hole on the Browns. Stefanski ran the most multiple TE sets in the league last season with the Vikings. The only viable TE on the Browns was Njoku. I expect them to also draft one. Edited March 16, 2020 by BarleyNY
Just Joshin' Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 I guess I am the only one to see Hooper as a good, not great TE. 1
QCity Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 The Browns certainly are aggressive in getting weapons for Mayfield. Not big on blocking, however.
Sherlock Holmes Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 But I thought Hooper wouldn't play somewhere it snows...
BigBillsFan Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 The Bills should have signed him. This was a no-brainer. $11 mil in the new age of contracts will be nothing for a guy who can scoop up 70 catches a year and a big outlet for a young QB. Who else could we have gotten for this price? 2
RyanC883 Posted March 17, 2020 Posted March 17, 2020 7 hours ago, IgotBILLStopay said: I too wanted Hooper and wouldnt have minded paying top dollar for him. But, with the Kroft restructure, at least we will be competitive at that position with Knox, Kroft, Sweeney and Croom. The Bills likely saw what it would take to get Hooper and that is why they quietly restructured Kroft. This off-season should just be about Knox catching 500 laser thrown balls everyday - we have to understand that Knox came to the team very underutilized in college. I think Knox can be a beast. But pairing him with Hooper would have been amazing. And Hooper was the best receiver FA IMO. 1
cle23 Posted March 17, 2020 Posted March 17, 2020 5 hours ago, QCity said: The Browns certainly are aggressive in getting weapons for Mayfield. Not big on blocking, however. Now they've agreed with Conklin.
Tesla03 Posted March 17, 2020 Posted March 17, 2020 (edited) we have had a bottom 3 ranked pass offense the last 2 years and we decide we are too good for Hooper but keep Tyler Kroft ....lol Edited March 17, 2020 by Tesla03
BillsFan17 Posted March 17, 2020 Posted March 17, 2020 One thing I hope people realize when they say that, we could have afforded that 1) Would said player would have wanted to come here? - Are they coming strictly to cash in, or are they going to be the same player they were before they got the pay day? 2) Would the player really have been a fit? 3) Would the organization want to allocate that much of its cap to that position? You can argue that if you cant find a way to use Hooper, than it's on the team, not the player. Yet we have seen many of FA targets flop for some of the reasons mentioned above.
stuvian Posted March 17, 2020 Posted March 17, 2020 (edited) 5 hours ago, QCity said: The Browns certainly are aggressive in getting weapons for Mayfield. Not big on blocking, however. you will note that they hired Ryan Grigson in a personnel job. Baker Mayfield will be lucky to last as long as Andrew Luck. Over/Under 3 more years till he gets demolished as a sack dummy Edited March 17, 2020 by stuvian
Recommended Posts