Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
40 minutes ago, Virgil said:

Yeah, the Cowboys can’t like this as they try to convince Dak to take 33.  
 

Allen’s contract already scares me 

If Allen leads us to a playoff victory, the new CBA with a 17 game season will get him $40 million per year

 

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

 

I don’t think Tannehill is a “bad” QB and I think the Titans were in a tough spot. But I think he’s a game manager type. 

Edited by YoloinOhio
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Gives Tennessee a 2 year window now if what they got from Tannehill last year can be repeated. I am sceptical that is can but if they believe it then they have a 2 year window. 

Agreed on both

Posted
46 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

 

 

May go down as the worst contract extension ever.

 

He played well for a fraction of a season.  15 completions over 1st 2 playoff games. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, klos63 said:

If Allen leads us to a playoff victory, the new CBA with a 17 game season will get him $40 million per year

 

I agree with this

Posted
1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

 

And I just think he is a class above the other guys. I put Ryan in the "how the hell didn't he win one?" category that Philip Rivers belongs in. He is a better Quarterback than Flacco, Stafford and Carr and Tannehill isn't even in the same ball park as Ryan. 

Same reason Garappalo doesn't have one.  Kyle Shanahan refuses to run the ball to close out the Superbowl.  I agree with you though that he's a step above the players I listed.

Posted
7 minutes ago, klos63 said:

If Allen leads us to a playoff victory, the new CBA with a 17 game season will get him $40 million per year

 

He's under contract for three more seasons assuming we pick up the 5th year option so we should have plenty of time to see if he's worth it.

Posted
34 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Gives Tennessee a 2 year window now if what they got from Tannehill last year can be repeated. I am sceptical that is can but if they believe it then they have a 2 year window. 

 

 

They just spent 62 million to see if he will be more like his first 6 seasons or more like his last 13 games.

 

Looks like Brady turned them away. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

He's under contract for three more seasons assuming we pick up the 5th year option so we should have plenty of time to see if he's worth it.

I think both sides would be looking for a long term deal sooner than year 5 if he continues to improve.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Lol. This contract is insane. Tannehill is not that good. He had some moxie last season but he will never lead them to a championship especially eating up that much cap.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

They just spent 62 million to see if he will be more like his first 6 seasons or more like his last 13 games.

 

Looks like Brady turned them away. 

 

Oh I agree totally. All I am saying is if they are right it creates a window for them.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

They just spent 62 million to see if he will be more like his first 6 seasons or more like his last 13 games.

 

Looks like Brady turned them away. 

 

Not sure why he'd turn them away.  They have what he's looking for in terms of receivers, a great running game and a good defense.

Posted
40 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Joe Flacco, Matthew Stafford, Matt Ryan, and Derek Carr come to mind when I see a contract like this.  Good but not great starting quarterbacks that keep your team from taking that next step because they need talent around them on both sides of the ball in order to win a Superbowl.  Their salary prohibits the team from acquiring that talent.  This was a bad move for the Titans.  Especially given last year may have been the exception and not the norm as far as Tannehill is concerned. 

Matt Ryan good not great? 

Posted
14 minutes ago, klos63 said:

I think both sides would be looking for a long term deal sooner than year 5 if he continues to improve.

I hope we get to that point.  However, if we're still not sure (like the Bucs and Titans last year), it's a good thing we have that 5th year option.

3 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

Matt Ryan good not great? 

Right now I don't even know if he cracks the top 10.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

I hope we get to that point.  However, if we're still not sure (like the Bucs and Titans last year), it's a good thing we have that 5th year option.

Right now I don't even know if he cracks the top 10.

You were clearly referring to the year they signed their contracts.

Posted
48 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

Joe Flacco, Matthew Stafford, Matt Ryan, and Derek Carr come to mind when I see a contract like this.  Good but not great starting quarterbacks that keep your team from taking that next step because they need talent around them on both sides of the ball in order to win a Superbowl.  Their salary prohibits the team from acquiring that talent.  This was a bad move for the Titans.  Especially given last year may have been the exception and not the norm as far as Tannehill is concerned. 

one of these will be a Chicago Bear or Case Keenum

Posted

That is an amazing contract for a guy who went 36-60 for 369 yards in 3 playoff games.

 

 

That's roughly a 60% pass completion and an average of 123 yards per game.

 

That's FRANCHISE QB CALIBER BOYS!!!??

×
×
  • Create New...