Jump to content

Aproval Rating of the Administration  

263 members have voted

  1. 1. Through 3 years, and on the cusp of a huge offseason, where is your approval rating for the McBeane admin?

    • 0-20
      0
    • 21-40
      1
    • 41-60
      1
    • 61-70
      5
    • 71-80
      21
    • 81-90
      115
    • 91-100
      120


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What is your personal approval rating of the McBeane administration to date? 

 

Lower number negative, higher number positive where 0 = completely disprove, fire them all; and 100 = completely approve, they can do no wrong and I will forever love them.

 

Feel free to give a specific number and explain why if you want.

Edited by whatdrought
Posted

81-90 for me.

 

Have done a lot of good, have had their fair share of Mistakes...

 

Will never put a coach or GM into the 90-100 range until they start winning some playoff games.

  • Like (+1) 12
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

81-90 for me.

 

Have done a lot of good, have had their fair share of Mistakes...

 

Will never put a coach or GM into the 90-100 range until they start winning some playoff games.

 

My thoughts exactly. I think I'd be in the 86-88 range if I were to narrow it even further. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, whatdrought said:

 

My thoughts exactly. I think I'd be in the 86-88 range if I were to narrow it even further. 

Yeah you break it lower I am probably in that range as well.

Posted

80-90 for both Beane and McDermott. They have done a nice job with the rebuild and changing the culture of this organization. I will bump the score up to 100 when/if the Lombardi trophy comes to Orchard Park, NY.

Posted

Solid, steady, sustainable growth.   Not much to complain about.  

 

Sure, some people will complain about this move or that move.   But the name of the game is winning and being a position to win more, and that describes what McBeane have done.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted

I'd say low 90's.  Beane and company have been making pretty good moves and doing a great job of keep flexibility on the cap, which is huge.

 

Not all of their moves have panned out, but you can see they are actively trying to make the team better, which is all I can ask for.

 

Now, let's get some 'reasonably' priced free agents, except for maybe 1 'splash' FA.  Maybe a DE? :)  Then draft a couple of great WR's in the draft and we will be golden.

Posted

Why do we have to lump them together? Beane is in charge of the roster. McDermott is in charge of coaching. They have different jobs. They are different people. They should receive different grades.

Posted
39 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

81-90 for me.

 

Have done a lot of good, have had their fair share of Mistakes...

 

Will never put a coach or GM into the 90-100 range until they start winning some playoff games.

Same as done a great job, the only way they'd go higher is if/when win a Super Bowl. 

Posted

91.

 

Love the culture and expectation of winning.

Many shrewd moves (Phillips, McKenzie, Duke, Wade, overhauling OL, snaking draft picks for cast offs)

Great drafts! (young, cheap TALENT)

 

But some clunkers too (Benjamin, Vontae, overpaying Star, pursuing AB, etc)

 

Overall, love riding the upward trend with this team. Next 5+ years look VERY promising!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, BuffaloBillies said:

91.

 

Love the culture and expectation of winning.

Many shrewd moves (Phillips, McKenzie, Duke, Wade, overhauling OL, snaking draft picks for cast offs)

Great drafts! (young, cheap TALENT)

 

But some clunkers too (Benjamin, Vontae, overpaying Star, pursuing AB, etc)

 

Overall, love riding the upward trend with this team. Next 5+ years look VERY promising!

I don't get how this keeps coming up..... Beane said he inquired about his availability just like any good GM would do if a great player became available. From what came out after, there wasn't even a deal in place.

 

As for the actual poll. I love the culture, I think the roster is getting better. 

 

It just seemed like last year at times, they weren't letting Josh Allen be Josh Allen. I think this off-season and season is going to be a huge tell of McDermott and Co.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Why do we have to lump them together? Beane is in charge of the roster. McDermott is in charge of coaching. They have different jobs. They are different people. They should receive different grades.

I think it's appropriate to grade them together.  As we've seen in the past, if you don't have a strong relationship between both the GM and the Coach, then that's usually a recipe for a failed organization.  They absolutely have to be on the same page.  The vision of both are completely aligned and i'm very happy of where we're at. 

For the grading, i'd put them right around 89-91.  I know everyone wants to see playoff wins or the ultimate goal of a SB win before grading them high, but they have taken us to the playoffs 2 out of 3 years and now a 10 win season.  And they've done this without any superstars on the team and with very low expectations.  That alone puts them in the 91-100 category for me.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Considering where this franchise has been over the last 20 years and where it is now headed they deserve 91-100.

 

Of course they are not perfect but based on what we have endured they about as close to that 100 that this fan base will ever see.

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
3 minutes ago, JMF2006 said:

Considering where this franchise has been over the last 20 years and where it is now headed they deserve 91-100.

 

Of course they are not perfect but based on what we have endured they about as close to that 100 that this fan base will ever see.

 

Agreed.  What we've endured over the last few decades and comparing what they've done compared to our other GM/Coaches of the past, it's hard not to put them over the 90 mark. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

81-90

 

He has established a winning RESPECT culture that now has players wanting to come here with expectations. He's had some misses with players but he is responsible with so much of the good and drafted quite well.

 

I can't go past 90 until the division is won and playoff games are won. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, Circlethewagon8404 said:

I think it's appropriate to grade them together.  As we've seen in the past, if you don't have a strong relationship between both the GM and the Coach, then that's usually a recipe for a failed organization.  They absolutely have to be on the same page.  The vision of both are completely aligned and i'm very happy of where we're at. 

For the grading, i'd put them right around 89-91.  I know everyone wants to see playoff wins or the ultimate goal of a SB win before grading them high, but they have taken us to the playoffs 2 out of 3 years and now a 10 win season.  And they've done this without any superstars on the team and with very low expectations.  That alone puts them in the 91-100 category for me.

I just don’t think that makes any sense. What if you like the roster but not the in game decisions? What if you like the preparedness of the team but think that the roster has major holes? We don’t say, “what’s your opinion of Hallen (Josh Allen and Jerry Hughes)?” Why, because they do different things!! There’s no reason to lump 2 people with very different roles together. 
 

Maybe my annoyance from this comes from my time in sports but these are very different roles. 

Edited by Kirby Jackson
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...