H2o Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 I take it this means they are out on Blake Martinez? 1
Kirby Jackson Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 I really expected him in Buffalo but I didn’t expect a 2 year $16M deal. Kirksey is a good player when healthy. With the Bills he would be a part-time player though. That feels like too much for the role he would have played. 1
Just Joshin' Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 14 minutes ago, wppete said: Pass way too expensive for an often Injured player. Agree on the pass. Injury issues for 2/6 years - not sure if often injured or unlucky. 1
MAJBobby Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said: Ok I am ok with this. I would not have wanted to go that High
Alphadawg7 Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 (edited) I might be in the minority here, but I think his deal is relatively fair. I don’t see him as fair to be labeled injury prone when his last injury isn’t the kind of reoccurring and just bad luck most likely. He was healthy first 4 years. Stafford was labeled fragile because he had a couple bad luck injuries to start his career. Then went a long time before getting hurt again. Sometimes in a violent game you get a couple injuries close to each other. I’m not so quick to label a guy injury prove over that, especially if it’s not consistent ticky tack stuff. But I also won’t lose sleep over this, but just do think his contract was reasonable based on his level of play before the last 2 years got shortened. Edited March 16, 2020 by Alphadawg7
Doc Posted March 16, 2020 Posted March 16, 2020 13 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said: I might be in the minority here, but I think his deal is relatively fair. I don’t see him as fair to be labeled injury prone when his last injury isn’t the kind of reoccurring and just bad luck most likely. He was healthy first 4 years. Stafford was labeled fragile because he had a couple bad luck injuries to start his career. Then went a long time before getting hurt again. Sometimes in a violent game you get a couple injuries close to each other. I’m not so quick to label a guy injury prove over that, especially if it’s not consistent ticky tack stuff. But I also won’t lose sleep over this, but just do think his contract was reasonable based on his level of play before the last 2 years got shortened. For a full-time LB'er like he'll be with the Pack but not here, it's a fair deal. Health-willing, of course. But time will tell on that one.
Recommended Posts