PISSCHUNK Posted April 15, 2005 Posted April 15, 2005 Cards-- I would accept the LJ Shelton and a swap of 2nds for sure. I would also "settle" for LJ and their 3rd instead of swapping 2nds. Bucs--I would not take on Kenyatta Walker or Stinchcomb straight up. I wouldn't take their 3rd straight up for Travis either. I would however take their 2nd rounder straight up for Travis. That seems logical but would hamper them in moving up into the first round for a "targeted' pick. Best deal to me: LJ and swap of 2nd's. Next best deal: Travis for the Bucs' 2nd rounder Last deal: LJ and their(Cards) 3rd rounder I know the Iggles have supposedly inquired but not sure about the interest. Late
Pete Posted April 15, 2005 Posted April 15, 2005 I think Tampa wants to hold onto their second so they can package it to move up to the #2 selection so they can select Alex Smith
Tipster19 Posted April 15, 2005 Posted April 15, 2005 What I wouldn't do is trade Henry for Arizona's 3rd rd pick (#95-last in the rd) in anyway, shape or form. Here's my wish list. a) Trade Henry for Tampa's 3rd rd pick (#91) and swap for each other's 2nd rders. Buffalo's 2nd rder is #55 and Tampa's is #36. b) Trade Henry for Tampa's 2nd rder outright. c) Trade Henry with Arizona for LJ Shelton and swap for each other's 2nd rders. Buffalo's is #55 and Arizona's is #44. I simply am not too excited about acqiring LJ, I just don't think he'll be able to crack our starting line-up. I'd rather have a higher pick than getting a back-up. * I'm not including any scenarios with Philly for the sole reason that I don't believe that they are really interested. My understanding is that we have been initiating the talks. If Philly is really in the picture, than I think that they would make the best trading partner of all. The possibilities with them would command the highest compensations due to all the draft picks that they have.
Marv's Neighbor Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 I'll bet if we get Shelton, he dosen't make the team!
The Jokeman Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 I'll bet if we get Shelton, he dosen't make the team! 306746[/snapback] Let me guess you think Jason Peters is going to beat him out for the LT spot?
Pac_Man Posted April 16, 2005 Posted April 16, 2005 I don't see Shelton as a long-term answer at LT. You don't want to pay a guy $3 million a year to be a backup; and you don't want to trade for a guy whom you're trying to replace. My vote would be to package Henry and Clements to a team like Arizona for their first and maybe something more (like a third). We then trade the picks from Arizona to someone else to move up a few spots in the first, so we can take Mike Williams.
Recommended Posts