Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

I love them showing the replay official live.

 

How's that for accountability NFL ??

 

 

.

 

And so far every replay call made sense. Being seen live on TV does wonders for your judgement, eh?

 

I have to get to FanDuel at the Meadowlands one of these days. Maybe @Gugny would meet up for Guardians game?

Edited by PromoTheRobot
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Real McNasty said:

https://stats.xfl.com/3

 

looks right to me

nope. It's just me, I guess

11 minutes ago, Mark Vader said:

The logo is good, but having it on a green helmet is a bad idea.

 

Don't like the two tone green uniforms.

They need dark purple for a complimentary color

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

So far I have enjoyed the games but I really do not understand why they mostly chose cities that already have NFL teams. 
 

 I would have liked to see:

- South Carolina (Columbia or Charleston)

- Omaha

- Austin or San Antonio

- Detroit (people are begging for something other than the Lions)

- St Louis

- San Diego

- Louisville or Lexington KY

- Oklahoma City

 

I also wonder what type of support they would have had if they chose a team in Buffalo?  I tend to believe the place would be packed this time of the year.

Posted
4 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

nope. It's just me, I guess

They need dark purple for a complimentary color

The best thing about Tampa Bay's uniforms is the Viper head on the front of the jersey.

 

That looks good.

Posted
Just now, coastalpika said:

So far I have enjoyed the games but I really do not understand why they mostly chose cities that already have NFL teams. 
 

 I would have liked to see:

- South Carolina (Columbia or Charleston)

- Omaha

- Austin or San Antonio

- Detroit (people are begging for something other than the Lions)

- St Louis

- San Diego

- Louisville or Lexington KY

- Oklahoma City

 

I also wonder what type of support they would have had if they chose a team in Buffalo?  I tend to believe the place would be packed this time of the year.

They played it safe where they can easily market them. 

Posted
1 minute ago, coastalpika said:

So far I have enjoyed the games but I really do not understand why they mostly chose cities that already have NFL teams. 
 

 I would have liked to see:

- South Carolina (Columbia or Charleston)

- Omaha

- Austin or San Antonio

- Detroit (people are begging for something other than the Lions)

- St Louis

- San Diego

- Louisville or Lexington KY

- Oklahoma City

 

I also wonder what type of support they would have had if they chose a team in Buffalo?  I tend to believe the place would be packed this time of the year.

 

Population base and facilities are likely the two big reasons. Do you think Bills fans would show up for some winter ball?

Posted
4 minutes ago, coastalpika said:

So far I have enjoyed the games but I really do not understand why they mostly chose cities that already have NFL teams. 
 

 I would have liked to see:

- South Carolina (Columbia or Charleston)

- Omaha

- Austin or San Antonio

- Detroit (people are begging for something other than the Lions)

- St Louis

- San Diego

- Louisville or Lexington KY

- Oklahoma City

 

I also wonder what type of support they would have had if they chose a team in Buffalo?  I tend to believe the place would be packed this time of the year.

 

AAF tried that last year, how did that work out?

Posted
20 minutes ago, Mountain Man said:

 

 

 

 

It's only the same as sports like cricket and rugby have been doing for over a decade. Its hardly revolutionary. 

 

 

I can appreciate that MM, but we don't get a lot of Cricket on TV here in WNY..............?

 

 

Murray finally gets off a good pass and it's dropped.........

 

.

Posted
1 minute ago, PromoTheRobot said:

Aaron Murray is not accurate.

Yeah. Although on that last play he stayed in the pocket, delivered, took the hit and the receiver just flat out dropped it.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Looks like they made some adjustments from yesterday. 
No sideline interviews immediately after. 
Unless I missed it no communications from coaches calling plays to the quarterback. 
Much different from yesterday’s games 

Posted
4 minutes ago, coastalpika said:

So far I have enjoyed the games but I really do not understand why they mostly chose cities that already have NFL teams. 
 

 I would have liked to see:

- South Carolina (Columbia or Charleston)

- Omaha

- Austin or San Antonio

- Detroit (people are begging for something other than the Lions)

- St Louis

- San Diego

- Louisville or Lexington KY

- Oklahoma City

 

I also wonder what type of support they would have had if they chose a team in Buffalo?  I tend to believe the place would be packed this time of the year.

Imo the major reason these other minor football leagues never succesful is because they WERNT in NFL cities. This is one of the smartest things the xfl has done. You can't put minor league teams in non football cities and expect it to be successful. Football fans want more football. Putting them in NFL cities is genius 

Posted
1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

I can appreciate that MM, but we don't get a lot of Cricket on TV here in WNY..............?

True..... 

 

It might be the most old and curious of sports but oddly the most advanced in replay tech. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Rc2catch said:

Looks like they made some adjustments from yesterday. 
No sideline interviews immediately after. 
Unless I missed it no communications from coaches calling plays to the quarterback. 
Much different from yesterday’s games 

Maybe, Fox's game was different from ABC's yesterday so it might just be that.

Edited by Warcodered
  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...