Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:

What?
1. Hillary wasn’t the president.

2. Proof of citizenship is a REQUIREMENT 

3. Nobody brought a serious charge of murder against Clinton and it certainly didn’t consume the workings of the House


Obama is a citizen is he not?

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You are aware of who originated the birther movement, right? It wasn't Trump. It was Hillary during her primary against Obama. 

 

 

 

That doesn't count.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You are aware of who originated the birther movement, right? It wasn't Trump. It was Hillary during her primary against Obama. 

 

 

It took Trump about a week to show the transcript of the call. It took Obama years to produce a birth certificate? Why exactly?

1 minute ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:


Obama is a citizen is he not?

 

 

You have to have BORN in the United States! That’s why Arnold couldn’t run. Sheeesh!

Posted
3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You are aware of who originated the birther movement, right? It wasn't Trump. It was Hillary during her primary against Obama. 

 

 


 

There has never been evidence that Clinton or her campaign started the birther rumors,” said Ben Smith, editor in chief of BuzzFeed, who as a POLITICO reporter in 2011 linked the origin of the “birther” movement to a fringe politician in Illinois. Some hardcore Clinton backers circulated the rumors in 2008, but the campaign itself steered clear.

“As we reported, some of her supporters flirted with the idea in 2008 — but it has its origins in the fever swamps beginning in Illinois in 2004,” he said.

In fact, birtherism, as it’s been called, reportedly began with innuendo by serial Illinois political candidate Andy Martin, who painted Obama as a closet Muslim in 2004. That spiraled into a concerted effort by conspiracy theorists to raise doubts about Obama’s birthplace and religion — and essentially paint him as un-American.

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/birther-movement-founder-trump-clinton-228304
 

2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

You have to have BORN in the United States! That’s why Arnold couldn’t run. Sheeesh!


no you don’t.  
 

citizenship is granted to children of US citizens

google it 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, SlimShady'sGhost said:


lol 

 

how many years did we hear this - LOCK HER UP !!!!!

 

 

Lock who up? HIllary?

 

We heard it for years.

 

But we never heard it while she was president because, well, y'know. She lost to Trump.

 

How many years did the right do LITERALLY NOTHING but challenge Obama's birth certificate while he was president?

 

That's right. They didn't.

 

Remove the blinders, brother. See the world. It's amazing right now.

Posted
26 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

lol.

 

1 stupid trump in office is enough.   

 

if any of his sons gets elected I’ll move to Scotland to be with my wife’s family. 
 

Why you ask?

 

Because it would prove how ignorant Americans have become.  

 


Get a head start.   Go now 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:


 

There has never been evidence that Clinton or her campaign started the birther rumors,” said Ben Smith, editor in chief of BuzzFeed, who as a POLITICO reporter in 2011 linked the origin of the “birther” movement to a fringe politician in Illinois. Some hardcore Clinton backers circulated the rumors in 2008, but the campaign itself steered clear.

“As we reported, some of her supporters flirted with the idea in 2008 — but it has its origins in the fever swamps beginning in Illinois in 2004,” he said.

In fact, birtherism, as it’s been called, reportedly began with innuendo by serial Illinois political candidate Andy Martin, who painted Obama as a closet Muslim in 2004. That spiraled into a concerted effort by conspiracy theorists to raise doubts about Obama’s birthplace and religion — and essentially paint him as un-American.

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/birther-movement-founder-trump-clinton-228304
 

 

 

Ben Smith covered for Hillary during the dossier fiasco too. He's part of the Clinton machine. Asking him to report honestly on the Clintons is not a wise tact to take. ;) 


Clinton weaponized it in the presidential primaries and spread it far and wide through cut outs. It's her MO.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
2 hours ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

One thing I've come to appreciate about Trump; he trolls the left so hard they don't have time to stop, breathe, and realize how relentlessly stupid they can sound at times.


It’s an incredible phenomenon, and you’re not wrong.

 

Anecdotally:  two of the smartest and most capable people I know, and I mean brilliant, with IQ’s in the high 160s who have achieved things most people never dream of, get absolutely twisted in knots to the point of incoherence over the President.  These are people who are *logical to a fault*.  But when it comes to Trump their eyes roll back in their heads, and it’s a tidal wave of raw emotions, and as homs as soon as you calmly present them with logic.

 

He breaks people.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, TakeYouToTasker said:


It’s an incredible phenomenon, and you’re not wrong.

 

Anecdotally:  two of the smartest and most capable people I know, and I mean brilliant, with IQ’s in the high 160s who have achieved things most people never dream of, get absolutely twisted in knots to the point of incoherence over the President.  These are people who are *logical to a fault*.  But when it comes to Trump their eyes roll back in their heads, and it’s a tidal wave of raw emotions, and as homs as soon as you calmly present them with logic.

 

He breaks people.

 

That's why he was picked for this job imo. He's a tank. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

lol.

 

1 stupid trump in office is enough.   

 

if any of his sons gets elected I’ll move to Scotland to be with my wife’s family. 
 

Why you ask?

 

Because it would prove how ignorant Americans have become.  

 

thank you for the response.

 

nothing personal, Shady. i was just honestly trying to gauge where your at here.

Posted
28 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Even you can recognize the extent to which the left has gone after this president.

 

For three years the left has done nothing -- literally NOTHING -- but attack this president from every position possible. From the embarrassment of the Kavanaugh hearings to the 3-year-time-wasting impeachment, from RUSSIARUSSIARUSSIA to calling everyone who voted for Trump a hillbilly racist, it's been Bash Trump 24/7 with literally no let up from the Dems and the media that serves them.

 

So first understand where the divisiveness originates. Unfortunately for the Dems, they're using their usual tried-and-true tactics against a man who, finally, isn't afraid to fight back.

 

Finally.

 

So since there is literally no indication that the left will stop...as is evidenced by them now planning to go after Impeachment V2,...I am happy to admit I'm fine with the divisiveness in our country because in the process, the right is winning and the left is losing SO badly that they're blowing up their own party.

 

 

 

 

Not surprised you are happy with the divisiveness.  I appreciate the honesty to admit that.

 

I see that Trump has been under investigation pretty much what was it, Jul/Aug 2016?  The difference between us appears to be whether or not he deserved to be investigated or not. 

 

If you want to claim that Mueller uncovered absolutely nothing, as Trump repeats, then it will sure appear Don is the victim.  If you recall, the Russians and wikileaks were interfering at the time.  If you agree that there were several suspicious 2016 campaign contacts and lies about those contacts, he appears much more deserving of the original Russia investigation, and so not really a victim at all. 

 

If you think he is the victim of an unjustified Ukraine investigation, then I disagree again.  Again though, his supporters claim they have sufficient reason to believe Donny did nothing wrong.  They believe, even in the face of Repub Senators allowing the House proved the accusations, everyone is just picking on him for his skin color....orange..

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, SlimShady'sGhost said:

 

What would you do if Don decides he want ever step down?


Would you support it?

 

 

Of course not.

This was already a thread (Kemp).

Your presentation is more polite, so thanks.

 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

If you want to claim that Mueller uncovered absolutely nothing, as Trump repeats, then it will sure appear Don is the victim.

 

Vol I of Mueller's own report says that there was nothing there. Not Trump. 

 

Facts are hard when you don't read the material you're citing. 

 

13 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

If you recall, the Russians and wikileaks were interfering at the time. 

 

Wikileaks was interferring by releasing 100% accurate information for the voters to decide themselves? 

 

Funny how scared you are of truth. 

 

13 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

If you agree that there were several suspicious 2016 campaign contacts and lies about those contacts, he appears much more deserving of the original Russia investigation, and so not really a victim at all. 

 

Not even Mueller found those "suspicious contacts" were in any way suspicious at the end. They were, in fact, traps set by the HRC campaign as the OIG proved. 

 

Again, you're demonstrating how much of a partisan slob you are.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Posted
2 hours ago, GG said:

 

Rear Admiral Chelsea approves of this message.   So does the Kennedy Compound.

 

So does Obama's mother in law.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...