Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, GG said:

This is a very good parallel to the Athletic story about Buffalo's attraction for free agents.  

 

Let's say the league goes to a prortional model based on ratings and merch sales. Buffalo could easily lose $30 million in annual revenues and run at a loss every year.   How long would Pegulas be willing to subsidize that loss, compounded by the potential of a new franchise 100 miles to the north in a market 4 times it's size?

 

We don't like it as Bills fans, but it doesn't change the reality.  

 

You aren't answering the question: what exactly are the revenue streams? 

What is the Bills revenue stream and what are the revenue streams of the other teams?

 

If a big part of it is TV, surely that is affected by when the games are on, and how widely they are broadcast. 

ow is it decided which games are to be televised where and when?

Posted
2 hours ago, whatdrought said:

I sometimes seriously wonder why the NFL owners put up with this clown? He's been absolutely terrible. From officiating, to player discipline, to the various scandals and other such things. How can they take him seriously? 

$$$ ... that’s the bottom line here

Posted
7 minutes ago, GG said:

This is a very good parallel to the Athletic story about Buffalo's attraction for free agents.  

 

Let's say the league goes to a proportional model based on ratings and merch sales. Buffalo could easily lose $30 million in annual revenues and run at a loss every year.   How long would Pegulas be willing to subsidize that loss, compounded by the potential of a new franchise 100 miles to the north in a market 4 times it's size?

 

We don't like it as Bills fans, but it doesn't change the reality.  

 

Why would the league ever do that? 

 

The Jones' and Kraft's and Kronke's would like that.   But getting a majority of the other owners to go along?   Most teams aren't in the super city group--they're more like the Bills.  They know where the action is--asset appreciation, not cash flow.   Can't see it happening...

 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2019/09/04/the-nfls-most-valuable-teams-2019-cowboys-lead-league-at-55-billion/#56c701252f1b

 

 2018 Operating Income Per Team ($ Millions)

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization

 

1

Cowboys $420  
2 Patriots $240  
3 Texans $176  
4 Eagles $150  
5 Giants $142  
6 Ravens $131  
7 Saints $126  
8 Redskins $120  
9 Jets $115  
10 Seahawks $106  
11 Colts $104  
12 Steelers $102  
13 Falcons $97  
14 Broncos $94  
15 49ers $93  
16 Cardinals $87  
17 Chiefs $83  
18 Bills $82  
19 Panthers $78  
20 Jags $77  
21 Lions $73  
22 Chargers $72  
23 Dolphins $67  
24 Bucs $66  
25 Vikings $65  
26 Bears $62  
27 Bengals $58  
28 Titans $53  
29 Packers $39  
30 Browns $32  
31 Rams $30  
32 Raiders $28  
       
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, Southern Bills Fan said:

I travel to all bills away games in the southeast. I’ve also been to new era recently. The amenities and condition of new era is no worse than the superdome in New Orleans or the titans stadium in Nashville or the Jags stadium in Jacksonville. 

Meh.  Those other stadiums have concourses that,  while not pretty,  are 2x to 3x wider and far more accommodating to fans.  

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted

Hey Rodger.  You going to pay for it?

 


Those are things that the group has to settle collectively and to address over the next several months, if not sooner,” Goodell said.
31 minutes ago, Mrbojanglezs said:

Don't we see this statement from Goodell every offseason?


yes we do 

Posted (edited)

Referring to some short term time frame like that does make me wonder if there is something happening behind the scenes, or is he just trying to rattle our cages. AGAIN. The coming months if not sooner??? What does THAT mean? Why invent urgency? Because you’ll have a tantrum if the Pegulas don’t act? 

 

.

Edited by Augie
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Whatever route they go (and it will be resolved soon it seems) Goodell better be ready to hand some money over from the stadium fund. I think teams get like $200 million or so. I know that was a figure thrown around for San Diego's failed bid. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

The Bills have to fix their stadium to his standards or what? 

He'll force us to move to Toronto? 

He'll stop scheduling home games?

He'll hold his face until he turns blue?

 

I mean, what happens if the Bills extend their current lease at New Era with only modest renovations?

 

Education please

They’ll probably manage to give us worse officiating 

Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, batmanfreek said:

Because people who go to games in Buffalo aren’t dropping a lot of money on tickets. I believe they are still one if not the cheapest tickets in the league. 
 

Fans won’t pay more for tickets if nothing is improved. 
 

on the flip side even with a new stadium those same fans won’t pay higher ticket prices.  
 

You may get a different type of fan showing up to the game if ticket prices go up. 

I think our fan base is amazing, but I’m not convinced that Buffalo has this untapped market for football fans who have yet to attend games at New Era Field. There’s not really a hidden wine and cheese in Buffalo waiting for a football palace to built. There also aren’t Fortune 500 companies waiting to dish out the big bucks. A new stadium would definitely maximize profits, but it would need to a modest stadium, and I think the comish would still be let down. 

Edited by SirAndrew
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Doc Brown said:

He's their lapdog who takes all the criticism so they don't have to.  He's also made them a lot of money since he took over as tv revenue has exploded.

 

 

....greedmeisters Jurrah and Boy Danny Snyder's $40 mil/yr puppet......think he'd bite THAT hand?......

Posted
1 minute ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

....greedmeisters Jurrah and Boy Danny Snyder's $40 mil/yr puppet......think he'd bite THAT hand?......

 

Well, no, but they are 2 out of 32 owners.  Are the other 29, some of whom apparently have a lower revenue stream than the Bills, let the two of them go their bully way?

Posted
Just now, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

Well, no, but they are 2 out of 32 owners.  Are the other 29, some of whom apparently have a lower revenue stream than the Bills, let the two of them go their bully way?

 

...great question.....who knows which ones have "sway power" behind closed doors and why......

Posted
3 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:


id love to see the business argument why this is so necessary. 
 

 

 
 

 

We all know it’s not necessary, it’s all a pile of warm steamy  BS. 

 

But not to worry,  PSE has already determined what they are going to do, and the plan is already in place. and it was part of the overall business plan right from the beginning/purchase of the team, and that implementation is only waiting for the start date, when ever that is. 

 

There will be much Nashing of teeth when the new stadium location is announced, it will be in the city of Buffalo, alongside the other large PSE investments already in place, and it will have a roof, change is the only constant. 

 

Go Bills!!!

Posted
1 minute ago, Don Otreply said:

We all know it’s not necessary, it’s all a pile of warm steamy  BS. 

 

But not to worry,  PSE has already determined what they are going to do, and the plan is already in place. and it was part of the overall business plan right from the beginning/purchase of the team, and that implementation is only waiting for the start date, when ever that is. 

 

There will be much Nashing of teeth when the new stadium location is announced, it will be in the city of Buffalo, alongside the other large PSE investments already in place, and it will have a roof, change is the only constant. 

 

Go Bills!!!

 

How is it going to be funded?

Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, Lurker said:

 

Why would the league ever do that? 

 

The Jones' and Kraft's and Kronke's would like that.   But getting a majority of the other owners to go along?   Most teams aren't in the super city group--they're more like the Bills.  They know where the action is--asset appreciation, not cash flow.   Can't see it happening...

 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2019/09/04/the-nfls-most-valuable-teams-2019-cowboys-lead-league-at-55-billion/#56c701252f1b

 

 2018 Operating Income Per Team ($ Millions)

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization

 

1

Cowboys $420  
2 Patriots $240  
3 Texans $176  
4 Eagles $150  
5 Giants $142  
6 Ravens $131  
7 Saints $126  
8 Redskins $120  
9 Jets $115  
10 Seahawks $106  
11 Colts $104  
12 Steelers $102  
13 Falcons $97  
14 Broncos $94  
15 49ers $93  
16 Cardinals $87  
17 Chiefs $83  
18 Bills $82  
19 Panthers $78  
20 Jags $77  
21 Lions $73  
22 Chargers $72  
23 Dolphins $67  
24 Bucs $66  
25 Vikings $65  
26 Bears $62  
27 Bengals $58  
28 Titans $53  
29 Packers $39  
30 Browns $32  
31 Rams $30  
32 Raiders $28  
       

 

Looks like the Bills and their stadium are already competitive. Right in the middle of the pack. I'd start rattling that Packers cage and force them out of their old, decrepit stadium, Goodell. Clearly they aren't pulling their weight. Or how about all those other teams below the Bills with newer stadiums?

Edited by MJS
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

 

You aren't answering the question: what exactly are the revenue streams? 

What is the Bills revenue stream and what are the revenue streams of the other teams?

 

If a big part of it is TV, surely that is affected by when the games are on, and how widely they are broadcast. 

ow is it decided which games are to be televised where and when?

 

The major revenues are from TV contracts- Direct TV, CBS, NBC, FOX & ESPN, followed by SiriusXM and other national radio - That's about $10 billion for the league as a whole and is shared equally.  If this changes, then yeah, Bills will be subject to the scheduling devil, which won't be kind.

 

Then come the new digital revenues, international & merch and licensing.    Those are the big ticket items, followed by stadium revenues, which are also split among gate receipts, concessions, parking, suites and PSLs.  These are not shared equally.  Bills have the lowest ticket prices, which are $30 below the NFL average, meaning visiting teams on average "lose" $3 million in lost revenue opportunity each time they play in Buffalo.   Conversely, Bills get a subsidy by playing away games in stadiums with higher ticket prices. 

 

Merchandising is another area where Bills are lagging.  Right now that revenue is shared.  But how many Allen jerseys are sold around the world compared to the stars?

 

The point I'm trying to get across is that the current revenue sharing deals aren't permanent.  The high revenue teams in big markets all upgraded their facilities recently, have pretty big debt payments and are subsidizing the smaller market teams.  The Forbes article that Lurker links is totally misleading about teams' finances.  I've always had a problem with Ozanian's methodology, starting from the basics that he's redefining accounting terms - Operating Income is not EBITDA, and it's certainly not inclusive of debt service costs.  That's why you see crazy low "operating income" numbers for Jets, Giants, Bears and Rams.   

 

These teams have crazy expenses now because they all upgraded their facilities.  I don't think it will sit well for Terry to come in and tell them to go pound sand after they just poured billions of their own money into new stadiums.

 

Like it or not, Buffalo is subsidized by the big NFL  teams.   All they want is for Pegula to try to keep up.

 

 

52 minutes ago, Lurker said:

 

Why would the league ever do that? 

 

The Jones' and Kraft's and Kronke's would like that.   But getting a majority of the other owners to go along?   Most teams aren't in the super city group--they're more like the Bills.  They know where the action is--asset appreciation, not cash flow.   Can't see it happening...

 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2019/09/04/the-nfls-most-valuable-teams-2019-cowboys-lead-league-at-55-billion/#56c701252f1b

 

 2018 Operating Income Per Team ($ Millions)

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization

 

1

Cowboys $420  
2 Patriots $240  
3 Texans $176  
4 Eagles $150  
5 Giants $142  
6 Ravens $131  
7 Saints $126  
8 Redskins $120  
9 Jets $115  
10 Seahawks $106  
11 Colts $104  
12 Steelers $102  
13 Falcons $97  
14 Broncos $94  
15 49ers $93  
16 Cardinals $87  
17 Chiefs $83  
18 Bills $82  
19 Panthers $78  
20 Jags $77  
21 Lions $73  
22 Chargers $72  
23 Dolphins $67  
24 Bucs $66  
25 Vikings $65  
26 Bears $62  
27 Bengals $58  
28 Titans $53  
29 Packers $39  
30 Browns $32  
31 Rams $30  
32 Raiders $28  
       

 

This chart is completely misleading as to the actual operating income and finances.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...