Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

 

I disagree.  They are professional activists with a byline

 

Perhaps, and this is just a thought, if Trump was more truthful and answered questions directly then the briefings wouldn't be so combative.  By way of example, Trump said something to the effect that he knew that coronavirus wouldn't return as strongly in the fall.  Twice he was asked for the basis for that statement.  Twice he dodged and said something non-responsive.  

Edited by SectionC3
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, meazza said:


Yesterday a reporter asked trump if about a policy to test every single person in old folks homes.  Apparently there was a governor who wanted to put that in place and he asked if he was ok with that.

 

Of course had the reporter actually followed the guidelines, that’s literally step 1 in phase 1 of the cdc guidelines.  How is it that a Canuck knows that but a reporter whose job is to know this stuff doesn’t ?

 

Yeah, last week the guy asked about oil, POTUS asked what the current barrel price was and he didn't know, "Get back to me when you know"

Posted
11 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Did anyone watch the little Asian gal reporter yesterday?

No but now i'm kinda curious about the little asian gal.  was she cute? :devil:

Posted
12 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Did anyone watch the little Asian gal reporter yesterday? Young lady, you’re talking to the President of the United States! Show some respect before you start rolling your eyes! Where are the media outlets finding these people? I’m guessing they’re the last players left on the bench! Or....how about the guy wearing the mask? If I’m the Secret Service, I’m telling that guy we can’t have him around the President!

 

She was the one that asked the question about the 2% of people tested. Never mind that is 2% of 390 million.

2 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

No but now i'm kinda curious about the little asian gal.  was she cute? :devil:

 

She was maybe 5 or 6.

 

But yeah I would

Posted
8 minutes ago, Gary M said:

 

Yeah, last week the guy asked about oil, POTUS asked what the current barrel price was and he didn't know, "Get back to me when you know"

 

Another fine example of a presidential dodge.  The question was something along the lines of, "Can I check in on oil today?"  Instead of allowing a substantive question to reach the floor, or answering the "pregnant" question (yes or no would have been appropriate), the prez responded with a question about the price of oil per bbl.  That type of response invites more direct and forceful questioning.  If you want to blame the media for doing its job, fine.  That's where the prez wants you to go. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Another fine example of a presidential dodge.  The question was something along the lines of, "Can I check in on oil today?"  Instead of allowing a substantive question to reach the floor, or answering the "pregnant" question (yes or no would have been appropriate), the prez responded with a question about the price of oil per bbl.  That type of response invites more direct and forceful questioning.  If you want to blame the media for doing its job, fine.  That's where the prez wants you to go. 

 

If they are going to ask a question they should know the subject!! Instead of just asking gotcha questions.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Another fine example of a presidential dodge.  The question was something along the lines of, "Can I check in on oil today?"  Instead of allowing a substantive question to reach the floor, or answering the "pregnant" question (yes or no would have been appropriate), the prez responded with a question about the price of oil per bbl.  That type of response invites more direct and forceful questioning.  If you want to blame the media for doing its job, fine.  That's where the prez wants you to go. 

The press is NOT doing its job. In an Information Age we’ve see the press devolve into a bunch of gossip mongering hacks. I guess it’s just what it’s become...but I’m assuming they’ll treat the next Democratic President the same way. Sure they will....right?

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Gary M said:

 

If they are going to ask a question they should know the subject!! Instead of just asking gotcha questions.

 

That's sort of the point.  Nobody knew the subject because the president didn't allow the question.  It very well could have been (and, given the context, probably was) a question about oil production and the president's negotiations with foreign producers to cut supply to protect the American energy industry.  So before cutting off the question, as the president did, let's at least determine what the subject of the question is. 

2 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

The press is NOT doing its job. In an Information Age we’ve see the press devolve into a bunch of gossip mongering hacks. I guess it’s just what it’s become...but I’m assuming they’ll treat the next Democratic President the same way. Sure they will....right?

 

They probably won't treat the next president the same way, you're right.  And that's because the next president probably will be more truthful and candid than the current president, meaning that there won't be nearly the antagonism between the press and the next administration, Democrat or Republican. 

Edited by SectionC3
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, /dev/null said:

No but now i'm kinda curious about the little asian gal.  was she cute? :devil:

 

At about 57 mins

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 hours ago, 3rdnlng said:

The word is that he is charming and a real delight to be around in a social setting. There's no doubt in my mind that he can be tough as nails in a business setting but his lifetime of real estate development (especially in NYC) has given him the ability to negotiate. He may start out with asking for the moon and it might sound preposterous to some but its just the opening salvo of a negotiation. Look at the fools he made of the media and how he bent the governors to his will regarding who was going to be in charge of opening up the respective states. He claimed that he had the authority to do so and everyone claimed that he didn't and even the dems brought up federalism as a point. Well he actually did have the authority due to the fact that all 50 states had a declared emergency. Using that authority is the last thing he wanted to do. Now the governors can do what they're paid to do but Trump can use the bully pulpit to encourage them to follow the guidelines. Not only is he doing what is right but he has taken the easy criticism away from the media. 

Ya...Well you are confusing attributes with results. Nobody in the US has wanted to do business with him since the for a long time - except I guess NBC. After a  string of bankruptcies with airlines, real estate, universities, food...etc...$ people wised up and they figured out the only person getting ahead in his deals was him. He lucked out in the 90's by being so far in debt...the only way his financiers could get a return was to ride it out. His recent financing has either been from out of the country or fake. Fake - meaning that many "Trump" developments throughout the world carry his name only - they aren't really his. 

 

In good deals - every one makes money - not just one guy. Being POTUS isn't about personal winning...its about everyone winning. Pretty much all trumps actions throughout this disaster is to make himself look good....and you guys eat it up. Lets look at some of his results:

  • US has 30 percent of the world's cases and deaths in CV19  - One can say - looking at the scoreboard - we have the worst response to CV19 considering our resources of money and brains. We have the best roster and a 6-10 record. 
  • Testing capacity to get economy back in line - nope 
  • New health care plan - nope
  • Budget balanced - nope
  • Debt reduced - nope
  • Wall built and Mexico paid for it - nope
  • Jared Middle East peace - nope
  • Jared testing - wha? 
  • NK nukes - yup
  • China deal? - Forget about it - will never get done
  • New Iran deal - nope
  • FoxConn factory - vapor
  • Economy built on massive govt debt - that will work in the long term - oh yea
  • Coal industry saved - hardly
  • Washing Macihnes built in Indiana - nope
  • Hydroxy whatever...the only thing cheaper than oil is the 35 million doses Jared bought

But you guys love him because you are some blend of racist, ignorant, brainwashed or myopically rich. Your relate to him because he blames everyone else for his problems...instead of looking at your own performance.

 

You love him because he pisses off the "elites" or "libs". All this was great  when he was in a position where nothing was really expected of him - when he did not need to actually produce anything of substance other than "owning the libs" .....He was able to ride a wave of US productivity and low interest rates that juiced the market for 3 years.

 

Now the US and World could use an actual leader - and that he is not.  

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, TH3 said:

But you guys love him because you are some blend of racist, ignorant, brainwashed or myopically rich. Your relate to him because he blames everyone else for his problems...instead of looking at your own performance.

 

Please, tell us more from your lofty perch of self-annointed and deluded sense of intellectual and moral superiority...

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, TH3 said:

Ya...Well you are confusing attributes with results. Nobody in the US has wanted to do business with him since the for a long time - except I guess NBC. After a  string of bankruptcies with airlines, real estate, universities, food...etc...$ people wised up and they figured out the only person getting ahead in his deals was him. He lucked out in the 90's by being so far in debt...the only way his financiers could get a return was to ride it out. His recent financing has either been from out of the country or fake. Fake - meaning that many "Trump" developments throughout the world carry his name only - they aren't really his. 

 

In good deals - every one makes money - not just one guy. Being POTUS isn't about personal winning...its about everyone winning. Pretty much all trumps actions throughout this disaster is to make himself look good....and you guys eat it up. Lets look at some of his results:

  • US has 30 percent of the world's cases and deaths in CV19  - One can say - looking at the scoreboard - we have the worst response to CV19 considering our resources of money and brains. We have the best roster and a 6-10 record. 
  • Testing capacity to get economy back in line - nope 
  • New health care plan - nope
  • Budget balanced - nope
  • Debt reduced - nope
  • Wall built and Mexico paid for it - nope
  • Jared Middle East peace - nope
  • Jared testing - wha? 
  • NK nukes - yup
  • China deal? - Forget about it - will never get done
  • New Iran deal - nope
  • FoxConn factory - vapor
  • Economy built on massive govt debt - that will work in the long term - oh yea
  • Coal industry saved - hardly
  • Washing Macihnes built in Indiana - nope
  • Hydroxy whatever...the only thing cheaper than oil is the 35 million doses Jared bought

But you guys love him because you are some blend of racist, ignorant, brainwashed or myopically rich. Your relate to him because he blames everyone else for his problems...instead of looking at your own performance.

 

You love him because he pisses off the "elites" or "libs". All this was great  when he was in a position where nothing was really expected of him - when he did not need to actually produce anything of substance other than "owning the libs" .....He was able to ride a wave of US productivity and low interest rates that juiced the market for 3 years.

 

Now the US and World could use an actual leader - and that he is not.  

 

You just nailed it.  I struggle to figure out what he's accomplished.  Judges, I guess, and dividing the country, for sure.  Renegotiating NAFTA, I suppose.  And I guess that he had a first phase trade deal with China.  But on balance, a whole lot of broken promises and nasty rhetoric.  That's the sum of the Trump presidency. 

 

Re: the bolded.  Thank you.  I'm glad somebody else realizes it.  All we have on the economic side of things is 3.5 years of dead money in an S&P index and a boatload of new debt in exchange for our trouble.  The whole thing is a house of cards, which really shouldn't have surprised anyone given this guy's business record.  

Edited by SectionC3
Posted
4 hours ago, Kemp said:

 

If he hadn't already shredded the Emoluments clause in the Constitution, it wouldn't be a big topic of discussion. The family wants relief after having illegally received funding for their properties. Just another layer of slime.

 

You'll need to back that up.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Have you watched the daily briefings? The media bias is on full display every single day and it’s now become obvious that they’re being purposefully combative and antagonist...and they simply don’t care. These simply aren’t professional people. 

 

You're right. If the press was professional, they would call him out every time he lies, like a free press is supposed to do.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Kemp said:

 

You're right. If the press was professional, they would call him out every time he lies, like a free press is supposed to do.  


But who would you suggest should call out the press for lying? Or do you think the press hasn’t lied? 


Gee, who could have guessed this was staged? 
 

https://mobile.twitter.com/talialikeitis/status/1253126254942773248

 

More of that honest media Kemp loves so much.  

  • Like (+1) 7
×
×
  • Create New...