Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/state/39-7-of-adults-in-new-york-face-elevated-coronavirus-risks/article_7cf94313-1df2-531b-bbe2-163a4ac8a2dc.html

 

Share of States’ Adult Populations at High Coronavirus Risk

Rank State % of Adults at Risk Due to Age or Medical Conditions % of Adults Over 60 Among All At-risk Adults % of Residents Age 18-60 Who Are at Risk Poverty Rate Uninsured Population
1 West Virginia 51.1% 68.3% 24.9% 17.8% 6.3%
2 Maine 47.2% 75.6% 17.9% 11.6% 8.1%
3 Arkansas 46.5% 66.9% 22.3% 17.2% 8.1%
3 Florida 46.5% 74.9% 17.9% 13.6% 13.0%
5 Alabama 46.1% 67.8% 21.6% 16.8% 9.7%
6 Kentucky 45.5% 68.8% 20.7% 16.9% 5.5%
7 South Carolina 44.7% 71.6% 18.7% 15.3% 10.8%
8 New Hampshire 44.5% 73.3% 17.6% 7.6% 5.8%
9 Tennessee 44.2% 68.3% 20.1% 15.3% 9.8%
10 Delaware 43.9% 74.2% 16.8% 12.5% 5.7%
11 Pennsylvania 43.8% 74.2% 16.7% 12.2% 5.5%
12 Missouri 43.7% 70.3% 18.7% 13.2% 9.3%
13 Mississippi 43.6% 68.3% 19.7% 19.7% 12.1%
13 Montana 43.6% 77.8% 14.6% 13.0% 8.4%
15 Vermont 43.5% 79.7% 13.5% 11.0% 4.3%
16 Ohio 43.4% 72.6% 17.4% 13.9% 6.3%
16 Oregon 43.4% 71.6% 17.9% 12.6% 7.0%
18 Michigan 43.3% 72.5% 17.3% 14.1% 5.3%
19 Louisiana 43.2% 67.2% 20.0% 18.6% 8.2%
20 Indiana 42.8% 69.0% 18.9% 13.1% 8.3%
20 New Mexico 42.8% 73.6% 16.5% 19.5% 9.3%
22 Oklahoma 42.5% 69.9% 18.2% 15.6% 14.2%
23 Rhode Island 42.4% 73.3% 16.4% 12.9% 4.4%
24 Arizona 42.2% 72.7% 16.6% 14.0% 10.4%
25 North Carolina 41.9% 71.2% 17.2% 14.0% 10.7%
26 Idaho 41.4% 73.5% 15.8% 11.8% 10.6%
27 Iowa 41.2% 76.4% 14.2% 11.2% 4.7%
28 Hawaii 41.1% 76.3% 14.2% 8.8% 4.0%
29 Kansas 40.9% 74.0% 15.2% 12.0% 8.8%
30 Connecticut 40.8% 76.4% 14.0% 10.4% 5.4%
31 Wyoming 40.6% 74.5% 14.9% 11.1% 11.4%
32 South Dakota 40.5% 77.8% 13.1% 13.1% 9.5%
33 Maryland 40.2% 71.9% 15.9% 9.0% 6.1%
34 Nebraska 40.0% 74.6% 14.5% 11.0% 8.3%
35 New Jersey 39.8% 73.4% 15.0% 9.5% 7.6%
36 Illinois 39.7% 72.9% 15.1% 12.1% 6.9%
36 Nevada 39.7% 73.5% 14.8% 12.9% 11.2%
36 New York 39.7% 73.6% 14.8% 13.6% 5.6%
36 Wisconsin 39.7% 77.7% 12.8% 11.0% 5.5%
40 Washington 39.6% 74.7% 14.2% 10.3% 6.3%
41 Georgia 39.5% 69.0% 16.8% 14.3% 13.6%
42 Virginia 39.2% 73.2% 14.8% 10.7% 8.8%
43 Massachusetts 39.0% 77.2% 12.7% 10.0% 2.8%
44 Minnesota 38.8% 77.7% 12.4% 9.6% 4.4%
45 North Dakota 38.0% 75.6% 13.0% 10.7% 7.4%
46 California 37.0% 72.6% 13.9% 12.8% 7.2%
47 Texas 36.5% 68.8% 15.2% 14.9% 17.5%
48 Colorado 36.4% 74.4% 12.8% 9.6% 7.5%
49 Alaska 35.3% 69.5% 14.3% 10.9% 13.2%
50 Utah 33.5% 68.0% 13.9% 9.0% 9.3%

Source: 24/7 Wall St.

 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

image.gif

image.gif

image.png

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said:

 

This thread has degenerated into a bunch of personal attacks and is no longer serving a useful purpose on this board.

 

Therefore, a gratuitous photo of a woman with big jugs is needed to restore this thread to intelligent conversation:

 

jc63y098hup11.jpg

 

 

Look at the size of those..........glasses.

 

Yes, there have been several valuable posts in this thread, with good information.

 

All you have to do is sort thru the Q, Busey, Tibsy childishness.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

Sure you can.............

 

In a more accurate way, it's not racist to accurately describe the origins of a virus, or a food, or anything else that has come to us from that country. "Chinese virus" is a perfectly accurate descriptor. The only people who benefit from your reluctance to use it are the Chinese communists who did this to you. They're exploiting your fear of being called racist to stop you from talking about how this happened.

 

And if some racists use it as an excuse to be racists, what does that have to do with you or me? I condemn them and I hope they're punished to the fullest extent of the law, while we still have police officers who aren't sick or afraid of getting sick. Racism is bad. But it's not racist to say "Chinese virus," even if stupid people do stupid things with that information.

 

 

 

 

 

Satire example of LiberalThink...........

 

HEH:

 

 

Screen-Shot-2020-03-31-at-2.57.54-PM.png

 

 

 

 

 

.

 
 
 
 
 
.
  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
On 3/30/2020 at 3:03 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

Will never work. 

 

This is asking for violence. 

 

 

Hey,

 

remember yesterday when we were wondering why Gov. Notham would pick such an odd date as Wednesday June 10th to close the state till?

 

Different, and longer than any other state.

 

Well,

 

 

 

The abortion governor strikes again.

 

 

.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 5
Posted
23 minutes ago, Buffalo Bills Fan said:

I think possibly the biggest thing people are missing is the incubation period.  Can't leave that detail out. 

 

The most studied data is from Wuhan.   The most virile time of incubation is within 3 days of infection, and follow on spread to others is within 7 days.  So if you've been clean for over a week, chances are you don't have it

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said:

 

 

 

 

 

This thread has degenerated into a bunch of personal attacks and is no longer serving a useful purpose on this board.

 

Therefore, a gratuitous photo of a woman with big jugs is needed to restore this thread to intelligent conversation:

 

jc63y098hup11.jpg

Well played sir! And as a gesture to others, I quoted you so everyone can see her again! ?

Posted
1 hour ago, Q-baby! said:

You’re an idiot. IQof3 makes a dumb comment and I’m the bad guy. Trump is a moron, you are a moron. Trump will be responsible for deaths. I want to see zero deaths. Can you comprehend that? Trump was a moron before this whole mess. I don’t need people dying to prove Trump is a moron.
Now, if you can show me anywhere saying I hoped for people to die, please show me or ***** off. 
 

 

Zero deaths was never a possibility with the Chinese virus. Even a moron would know that. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, \GoBillsInDallas/ said:

 

 

 

 

 

This thread has degenerated into a bunch of personal attacks and is no longer serving a useful purpose on this board.

 

Therefore, a gratuitous photo of a woman with big jugs is needed to restore this thread to intelligent conversation:

 

jc63y098hup11.jpg

Post a link to the page that you got this from..... I must know!

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Quote

 

A Korean War-era law called the Defense Production Act has been invoked hundreds of thousands of times by Mr. Trump and his administration to ensure the procurement of vital equipment, according to reports submitted to Congress and interviews with former government officials.

Yet as governors and members of Congress plead with the president to use the law to force the production of ventilators and other medical equipment to combat the pandemic, he has for weeks treated it like a last resort, to be invoked only when all else fails.

“You know, we’re a country not based on nationalizing our business,” Mr. Trump said earlier this month. “Call a person over in Venezuela, ask them how did nationalization of their businesses work out? Not too well.”

The law’s frequent use, especially by the military to give its contracts priority ratings to jump ahead of a vendor’s other clients, has prompted those most familiar with it to question why the administration has been so hesitant to tap it for a public health emergency.

“What’s more important? Building an aircraft carrier or a frigate using priority ratings or saving a hundred thousand lives using priorities for ventilators?” said Larry Hall, who retired in August as the director of the Defense Production Act program division at the Federal Emergency Management Agency. “If we used the president’s logic, most of our economy is already nationalized. But it isn’t.”

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/31/world/coronavirus-live-news-updates.html?action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage

Posted
23 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

Zero deaths was never a possibility with the Chinese virus. Even a moron would know that. 

Thanks tips! That wasn’t the point. 

×
×
  • Create New...