BillStime Posted June 11 Posted June 11 On 6/9/2020 at 8:49 PM, B-Man said: ENOUGH ! This aged well, Bonnie.
B-Man Posted June 11 Posted June 11 11 hours ago, BillStime said: Yes it did. Thanks for highlighting your ignorance for the board claiming that it didn’t 😆
BillStime Posted June 11 Posted June 11 13 minutes ago, B-Man said: Yes it did. Thanks for highlighting your ignorance for the board claiming that it didn’t 😆 MY IGNORANCE? COVID DIDN'T END ON JUNE 9, 2020. Idiots
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted June 11 Posted June 11 Easy cure for one of these issues - make it easier to chop off body parts. What could go wrong? 1
Doc Posted June 11 Posted June 11 5 hours ago, BillStime said: MY IGNORANCE? COVID DIDN'T END ON JUNE 9, 2020. Idiots It also didn't get "shut down" on January 20, 2021. Or anytime thereafter, for that matter.
B-Man Posted June 11 Posted June 11 This thread is FULL of those ignorant enough to have swallowed without question. 1
The Frankish Reich Posted June 13 Posted June 13 On 6/10/2024 at 9:34 AM, B-Man said: . I see the little "Truth Social" brand on this. Funny how Mr. Operation Warp Speed now panders to the anti-vax morons.
Scraps Posted August 30 Posted August 30 3 minutes ago, B-Man said: Nobody is calling for any such thing. This is nothing more than fear mongering.
B-Man Posted September 24 Posted September 24 I doubt that it is even that high. People are waking up. Poll: Only 45% of older adults will get updated COVID vaccines https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/poll-only-45-older-adults-will-get-updated-covid-vaccines .
B-Man Posted September 29 Posted September 29 They repeat that there is no evidence to support masking children, and explain that there is no real-world evidence showing effectiveness of child mask mandates, with zero randomized controlled trials conducted to determine whether masking kids would prevent the spread of COVID. It’s inexcusable to mandate a policy with no evidence, but even worse considering the demonstrable harms. "Speech, language, and learning: Humans rely on visual information provided by a speaker’s face to decode speech. Seeing mouth movements and facial gestures accelerates recognition of words and enhances speech comprehension [12], [19], [20], [21]. The integration of audio and facial information is crucial to speech perception and development. Visually impaired children often have delays in speech and language development [22], which may be due, at least in part, to reduced ability to perceive," they write. Masks prevent children from learning, from seeing mouth movements or facial gestures. They fundamentally detract from a child’s ability to develop speech and language. Among many other problems covered in the full study. These harms were well known before COVID. This isn’t new information; and it’s obviously common sense. So why did public health authorities ignore it, in favor of promoting evidence-free policies and mandates? Forcing their absurd, fatalistic, hyper-safetyism on adults was and is one thing. Imposing it on children is another. And their refusal to admit they were wrong meant the growth and development of kids were most certainly harmed and stunted for years, while ensuring that there would be terrified, misinformed parents who would continue to force their kids to wear masks indefinitely. When you consider those consequences, rationality fades, and a disturbing likelihood of malicious intent becomes a lot more realistic. https://www.outkick.com/analysis/new-study-confirms-masks-were-harming-children-thanks-unsupported-policies
ScotSHO Posted November 1 Posted November 1 Or here's an idea Fortune Magazine, maybe don't enable politicians who shut down society for political gain? Nah, that would be too obvious. I can't wait for fake doctor frankinfurter (feelble old guy) to tell us we did it right. Because we didn't do right for anyone under 50 that had an immune system. 1
Recommended Posts