C.Biscuit97 Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 5:09 AM, OZBILLS said: Allen and LSU's WRs or Burrow and Buffalo's WR's? Expand ? the Burrow thing is insane to me. He was ok last year and just had one of the greatest seasons in college football history. Allen didn’t have half of the year he had in the MWC. That said, Burrow is surrounded by elite college talent. But man is he really accurate. Allen is far more physically talented but I won’t be shocked if Burrow is already a better passer as a rookie. and just cause guys are good in college doesn’t mean they will be in the pros. Beasley will end up having a better career than the majority of guys drafted this year. But yeah on paper, the LSU and Bama receivers are in insane.
buffaloboyinATL Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 I do not usually play along on the college players being better than pros questions, (i.e.could LSU beat the Bengals) but these receivers are already close enough to the draft to see their NFL projections and their ceilings are all pretty high. So I voted yes, they are better, although Brown and Beasley have already proved it at the next level, which is saying a lot.
Teddy KGB Posted January 14, 2020 Author Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 3:41 PM, buffaloboyinATL said: I do not usually play along on the college players being better than pros questions, (i.e.could LSU beat the Bengals) but these receivers are already close enough to the draft to see their NFL projections and their ceilings are all pretty high. So I voted yes, they are better, although Brown and Beasley have already proved it at the next level, which is saying a lot. Expand John Brown Can’t do all this. This man chase is a bad bad man. 1
Just Joshin' Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 This shows the improvement the Bills have made. Rather than asking if a college team can beat the Bills, it is being asked if a college position group is better. WR seems to be the hardest to project success from college to NFL. High picks flame out, UDFA flourish. While the LSU receivers look good, history would indicate 1 or 2 will not make it. 2
The Process Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 5:09 AM, OZBILLS said: Allen and LSU's WRs or Burrow and Buffalo's WR's? Expand Burrow and Buffalo's WRs .....literally.....next year....QB competition!
PIZ Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 5:09 AM, Da webster guy said: Only one in four 1st round draft pick NFL receivers in this breakdown from 2000-2014 translate to great pros. It's basically one per year. Check it out https://www.fantasyindex.com/2015/04/13/factoid/first-round-wide-receivers Expand I wish they would have did a SORT - YEAR - YARDS before putting that on there.
DrDawkinstein Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 6:04 AM, Doc Brown said: Burrow. The Bengals picked a good year to hire a bad coach. Expand It's really unfortunate that such a good QB is going to be so thoroughly ruined by a horrible franchise. 1
Mojo44 Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 2:41 PM, NewEra said: Change that from DuDe to Dolt. John Brown is more than a #3 Expand Brown might be, and I really mean might be, at best, a good number two receiver. In no way is he a number one receiver despite the night season he had. He disappears and games too often and he is not capable of putting the team on his back like a true number one should be able to do. I Brown might be, and I really mean might be, at best, a good number two receiver. In no way is he a number one receiver despite the night season he had. He disappears and games too often and he is not capable of putting the team on his back like a true number one should be able to do.
Teddy KGB Posted January 14, 2020 Author Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 7:12 PM, DrDawkinstein said: It's really unfortunate that such a good QB is going to be so thoroughly ruined by a horrible franchise. Expand you think that’s possible ? the guy looks pretty flawless, gonna win in time for sure
DrDawkinstein Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 (edited) On 1/14/2020 at 8:09 PM, Teddy KGB said: you think that’s possible ? the guy looks pretty flawless, gonna win in time for sure Expand The way that Paul Brown runs that team, much like the way Ralph ran the Bills (but even worse ?), I dont doubt they could ruin even the greatest players. Serious question: Do you think if the Bills had drafted Brady in 2000, with the state of the franchise, he still would have gone on to be the GOAT? Edited January 14, 2020 by DrDawkinstein 1
Teddy KGB Posted January 14, 2020 Author Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 8:15 PM, DrDawkinstein said: The way that Paul Brown runs that team, much like the way Ralph ran the Bills (but even worse ?), I dont doubt they could ruin even the greatest players. Serious question: Do you think if the Bills had drafted Brady in 2000, with the state of the franchise, he still would have gone on to be the GOAT? Expand he would have dinked and dunked his way into the playoffs a few times I would think
DrDawkinstein Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 8:18 PM, Teddy KGB said: he would have dinked and dunked his way into the playoffs a few times I would think Expand If for no other reason than keeping him off the Pats would have hampered their dynasty. ? 1
Mr. WEO Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 5:09 AM, Da webster guy said: Only one in four 1st round draft pick NFL receivers in this breakdown from 2000-2014 translate to great pros. It's basically one per year. Check it out https://www.fantasyindex.com/2015/04/13/factoid/first-round-wide-receivers Expand I wouldn't mind a 1 in 4 chance to get a "great" NFL WR on the roster. Beats having zero on the roster year after year after... 1
NewEra Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 8:07 PM, Mojo44 said: Brown might be, and I really mean might be, at best, a good number two receiver. In no way is he a number one receiver despite the night season he had. He disappears and games too often and he is not capable of putting the team on his back like a true number one should be able to do. I Brown might be, and I really mean might be, at best, a good number two receiver. In no way is he a number one receiver despite the night season he had. He disappears and games too often and he is not capable of putting the team on his back like a true number one should be able to do. Expand He’s not “at best a good #2”. He IS a good #2 2
Mojo44 Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 8:51 PM, NewEra said: He’s not “at best a good #2”. He IS a good #2 Expand Nope. Not dominating or consistent enough to be even in that category. But you’re entitled to your opinion
Teddy KGB Posted January 14, 2020 Author Posted January 14, 2020 On 1/14/2020 at 8:59 PM, Mojo44 said: Nope. Not dominating or consistent enough to be even in that category. But you’re entitled to your opinion Expand he’s had back to back 1,000 yard seasons no ? he’s Definetly a good #2
colin Posted January 14, 2020 Posted January 14, 2020 i voted both because the poll wasn't done with radio buttons and im sorry but im basically a monster and an agent of chaos.
Recommended Posts