Jump to content

Duke Williams played more snaps than Cole Beasley


HappyDays

Recommended Posts

Just now, TPS said:

What most of us have been suggesting, given the roster, he is a better option than Foster.  You suggested playing "Duke "didn't work." It's clear that he gave the Bills passing game more than Foster has all season.  So what makes you say it didn't work, one play?

 

 

I think the expectation was that he was gonna come out and light up the texans for 100+.

 

That clearly didn't happen

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

I think the expectation was that he was gonna come out and light up the texans for 100+.

 

That clearly didn't happen

 

You're creating a straw man argument. Most of what I've seen is people suggesting they needed a bigger target as an option, especially with Foster's lack of production. From my perspective, he produced significantly more than I expected as the fourth WR, and he gave them the opportunity to actually make that type of throw to the end zone.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

If he is on the roster next year we have not done a good job in the offseason.

 

I don't ardently disagree but I think they could add a lot of guys and still have room for Duke.

 

There is one WR above replacement level on this roster:   John Brown

 

What Beasley provides in the short area he taketh away with his lack of anything else..........but he's the second best WR.

 

Duke is actually the 3rd least replaceable........which is sad.......he actually has a useful skillset as a physical possession receiver with some potential for big plays downfield. 

 

If McKenzie is your WR6 or WR7 then *maybe* that's OK but he's barely above practice squad level because he can't return kicks.

 

Roberts is a waste of a roster spot...........he catches punts.........they gotta' find someone who can do that and more.  

 

Foster is an unknown but it doesn't look good and you can't worry about saving a roster spot for him anymore.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

If he is on the roster next year we have not done a good job in the offseason.

Duke will have a full off season with the team.  Hopefully he'll progress.  To assume he is as good as he's going to be is illogical.  I do like the timing/rapport he has with Josh already.  I think he can be an asset, but I don't expect more than a WR4, or WR5 role. 

 

If he were to lead the team in targets next year, either he has made incredible strides, or we're in trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

I can't believe that people are on here criticizing Duke Williams, but when it comes to John Brown, crickets... His failure to stay in bounds was a huge play in the game. That was a routine sideline grab and should have set us up first and goal. People wanted to call HIM a #1 receiver? He's a soft, finesse player who needs to work in space opposite a true #1.

 

I cant find it now but someone was actually defending Brown on that play saying that Allen threw the ball late and Brown had no room.  HAHAHAHAHA.  The ball was fine and Brown had plenty of room.  He didn't even need to leave his feet.

 

JB.thumb.jpg.44a68aca9885c5c51f0fd654b91ba3ab.jpg

I have no freaking clue how he didn't keep his feet in here.

Edited by Scott7975
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

I don't ardently disagree but I think they could add a lot of guys and still have room for Duke.

 

There is one WR above replacement level on this roster:   John Brown

 

What Beasley provides in the short area he taketh away with his lack of anything else..........but he's the second best WR.

 

Duke is actually the 3rd least replaceable........which is sad.......he actually has a useful skillset as a physical possession receiver with some potential for big plays downfield. 

 

If McKenzie is your WR6 or WR7 then *maybe* that's OK but he's barely above practice squad level because he can't return kicks.

 

Roberts is a waste of a roster spot...........he catches punts.........they gotta' find someone who can do that and more.  

 

Foster is an unknown but it doesn't look good and you can't worry about saving a roster spot for him anymore.

 

 

Good assessment. It’s too bad they can’t find someone who is a beasely/McKenzie hybrid. As it is, they have too many one-trick WRs. 

Oh, btw, I got slammed for suggesting Roberts was a waste...

Edited by TPS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, familykwi said:

Duke will have a full off season with the team.  Hopefully he'll progress.  To assume he is as good as he's going to be is illogical.  I do like the timing/rapport he has with Josh already.  I think he can be an asset, but I don't expect more than a WR4, or WR5 role. 

 

If he were to lead the team in targets next year, either he has made incredible strides, or we're in trouble.

 

He isn't very good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, TPS said:

Good assessment. It’s too bad they can’t find someone who is a beasely/McKenzie hybrid. As it is, they have too many one-trick WRs. 

Oh, btw, I got slammed for suggesting Roberts was a waste...

That's exactly who they need. A hybrid nickel DB who can also be your returner and gunner too on ST. Duke should never have sat 1 game. We do have too many one dimensional wrs. 

 

3 in 1

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Joe in Winslow said:

No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying Duke isn't what his fan club thinks he is

no he's just better than the dumpster fire on our depth chart after Brown and Beasley  We had arguably the worst wr core in the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HappyDays said:

 

 

Not sure what you saw. This is as perfect as it gets. I watched it in slow motion. It hits Duke right in his hands. The defender is making some contact but I don't think he gets his hand on the ball. Duke just flubbed it.

My mistake. The one I was thinking of was in the end zone as well and Josh over threw Williams by a yard. 
 

That play eerily reminds me of Ronnie Harmon in 1989 when the Bills lost to the Browns. I’m still not down on Williams. He’s barely played this year which was baffling considering Robert Foster did next to nothing all season long. Maybe if Williams played all season long, had more game time experience, it’s possible he makes the catch? (Not making excuses for him). I know Williams was devastated afterwards, especially with being out of the NFL and the long hard road to get back and have another opportunity. There’s plenty of blame to go around on this loss. I hope everyone involved (players, coaches) use this as motivation in the offseason to get better.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DuckyBoys said:

no he's just better than the dumpster fire on our depth chart after Brown and Beasley  We had arguably the worst wr core in the NFL

I could be wrong but I think the Bills were the only NFL team to feature (based on targets) only 2 wrs this year. We had no #3 at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TheProcess said:

100% disagree, and completely discounts the big third down catches he had to pick up first downs. Duke was active as he should’ve been all year. Made some big catches and Josh clearly trusted him to make a play. Yes, unacceptably dropped the TD, but name a receiver that hasn’t dropped a TD. It happens sometimes. Doesn’t mean he shouldn't be active. 

 

With that said, we definitely need to upgrade the weapons Josh has at his disposal next year. If Beane doesn’t neglect offensive weapons this offseason, guys like Bob Foster, McKenzie, and Duke will have a tough time making the team next year. Only receiver guarantees should be Brown and Beasley. Everyone else could be upgraded. 

This.  Need to go after WR bad this offseason, not just bring in one, but a few so we can score some freaking points.  Our current WR roster is average to below average, it needs to be upgraded badly.  John Brown should not be the number 1 wr, he has never been on his previous teams.  I like the guy, but we need upgrades to a real NFL WR group, we upgraded this year from where we was, but we need to upgrade again and make a real NFL WR roster.  John Brown and Cole Beasley are the only ones that should be considered locks imo.  Replace WR like we did Oline this year, and also continue to upgrade on the OL as well

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Late in replying to this, and this is rather puzzling from the Duke haters' perspective. I would understand the argument if Duke had played the whole season and getting more reps with Allen. All I'm seeing from the Duke hate boys is either he's not very good, or the almighty the coaches know better. If McDermott can give Zay Jones that many chances in 3 years, then be fair and give Duke at least one. Lack of reps and the guy still turned in a solid performance when he did play. Everyone saying he's bad because he missed a TD pass, does that mean Smoke should be treated the same after the drop against Baltimore? As far as hands go, I think Duke is as good if not better than our 1 and 2 WR.

 

Then I read something that oh he celebrates after he makes a catch, so what? I don't care if he break dances after a catch as long as he catches the ball. He caught the game winner against the Titans and the over the shoulder catch against Washington wasn't exactly an easy catch in itself. I'm hoping he gets a legit chance next year

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:

When McD says "we could have done a better job" of getting so and so the ball, or x player more involved, is this a criticism of Dabs?? 

lot of plays at the end of the game and the graphic at bottom showed the WR's and it read Brown McKenzie Williams...McKenzie was on the field vs Beasley.... looked like a Daboll thing imo course I have no clue who is saying what WR's to run out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...