Beerball Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 OT Alex Barron (Florida State) Vital statistics: 6 foot 7½, 318 pounds, 4.86 in the 40, 19 bench press reps. Didn't Clarett run a 4.8 40? For 318 lbs this guy can move. He's more than .5 secs faster than Adam Terry.
Stussy109 Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 OT Alex Barron (Florida State)Vital statistics: 6 foot 7½, 318 pounds, 4.86 in the 40, 19 bench press reps. Didn't Clarett run a 4.8 40? For 318 lbs this guy can move. He's more than .5 secs faster than Adam Terry. 304870[/snapback] 19 bench presses @225lbs is pretty weak for a 319lb offensive tackle...
R. Rich Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 19 bench presses @225lbs is pretty weak for a 319lb offensive tackle... 304898[/snapback] Yeah, but he can beat Adam Terry in the ever so common 40 yard OL sprint by half a second.
Beerball Posted April 14, 2005 Author Posted April 14, 2005 Yeah, but he can beat Adam Terry in the ever so common 40 yard OL sprint by half a second. 304913[/snapback] Are you maucking me?
Kelly the Dog Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 He will be awesome when chasing RBs 40 yards down the field to make a block, beating the other linemen by a half yard. The rest of the game, meaning, every single play, that 40 time means zero. I don't even know why they clock these OL in the 40. I would imagine that the 10 yard dash time means exponentially more to a scout or coach or GM than the 40 time.
Surfmeister Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 19 bench presses @225lbs is pretty weak for a 319lb offensive tackle... 304898[/snapback] Yep, I live in Tallahassee and the local FSU fans always complain about how WEAK Alex Baron is. Weak weak weak, that's all I hear about him. Good observation! He mostly used his speed to run away from the D-Line guys. It would be best if the Bills passed on this guy, and followed your suggestion.
R. Rich Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 Are you maucking me? 304920[/snapback] He will be awesome when chasing RBs 40 yards down the field to make a block, beating the other linemen by a half yard. The rest of the game, meaning, every single play, that 40 time means zero. I don't even know why they clock these OL in the 40. I would imagine that the 10 yard dash time means exponentially more to a scout or coach or GM than the 40 time. 304922[/snapback]
theesir Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 Are you maucking me? 304920[/snapback] Mauck...... Carl Mauck
stinky finger Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 Mauck...... Carl Mauck 304949[/snapback] Don't be silly.......you know he speaks of the once great Rams back......Marshall Mauck.
Beerball Posted April 14, 2005 Author Posted April 14, 2005 Mauck...... Carl Mauck 304949[/snapback] Exactly
Beerball Posted April 14, 2005 Author Posted April 14, 2005 Don't be silly.......you know he speaks of the once great Rams back......Marshall Mauck. 304953[/snapback] fu if you can't understand sarcasm
Beerball Posted April 14, 2005 Author Posted April 14, 2005 304930[/snapback] So what you are saying is that speed does not factor into the play of an offensive lineman and I should stick to off topic subjects? Fine, you asked for it bub.
Surfmeister Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 FSU Draft Rankings Alex is slated for 1st round. I hope Rix doesn't get drafted at all.
R. Rich Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 So what you are saying is that speed does not factor into the play of an offensive lineman and I should stick to off topic subjects? Fine, you asked for it bub. 304959[/snapback] With linemen, it's more about quickness than just pure speed. Speed is great, but the ability to beat the defender off the snap and to get into position where you can get the better of him is way more important. For that reason, 40 times are for the most part irrelevant when evaluating OL.
The Jokeman Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 Pat Kirwin has a good piece about it not being all about the forty time at NFL.com
Bill from NYC Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 19 bench presses @225lbs is pretty weak for a 319lb offensive tackle... 304898[/snapback] 19 reps does seem like a small number for a guy that size. Remember Jamie Nails? He did about 19,000 reps and he STILL sucked. Did we draft any good blockers besides Ruben and Jennings in the last 10 years? Sorry, I just cant sing the praise of Mike Williams. Not for 9.15 million dollars. Not yet.
R. Rich Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 19 reps does seem like a small number for a guy that size. Remember Jamie Nails? He did about 19,000 reps and he STILL sucked. Did we draft any good blockers besides Ruben and Jennings in the last 10 years? Sorry, I just cant sing the praise of Mike Williams. Not for 9.15 million dollars. Not yet. 304974[/snapback] So, if you remove the dollar amounts, you think ONLY Jonas and Ruben were good blockers?
ans4e64 Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 jamie nails sucked with us, this is true, but he went to miami and was a pro bowl left guard for them, im not sure if he made it, was a reserve, or was snubbed but i remember miami fans talking about it
stinky finger Posted April 14, 2005 Posted April 14, 2005 fu if you can't understand sarcasm 304956[/snapback] easy....easy....I understand sacasm.........BTW....it's FSU not FU
Recommended Posts