JMF2006 Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 12 hours ago, oldschoolfootball1963 said: instead of reviewing if he made the first down why no review of that That part of the play is not reviewable only whether the runner reached the line of gain before being downed.
Cheektowaga Chad Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 Why isn't this a reviewable play? I mean this is the easiest play to review. To me it actually makes no sense why you can't review this especially if you allow pass interference reviews which are total judgement calls A delay of game review is black and white. Why isnt this allowed?
Not at the table Karlos Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 (edited) 12 hours ago, row_33 said: The TV screen is not the official clock the TV screen is often wrong There’s pics of the clock on the field at zero. Is that one wrong too? edit didn’t see it posted already Edited January 5, 2020 by Not at the table Karlos
MJS Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 2 hours ago, Da webster guy said: McD called that TO from the sideline. Regardless the play clock had expired two seconds earlier.
row_33 Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 4 hours ago, Da webster guy said: McD called that TO from the sideline. they are extremely forgiving on allowing time outs “before” the shot clock runs out the stadium scoreboard is by rule the official time, but that’s not the whole matter because an on-field official, the ref??, overrules often to reset, the scoreboard should reflect the official time but doesn’t always the TV clock is often off a few seconds, you come back from commercials with it adjusted frequently the TV clock is often wrong on resetting and starting the countdown a few times a month the TV shot clock goes off before the 2 minute warning, but the ref has told the QB the official time allows the QB to not snap the ball to get to the warning not a science.... basketball is the worst
row_33 Posted January 5, 2020 Posted January 5, 2020 ——- they put two shotclocks on the screen for the Vikes game, a few times .75 seconds diff between them there you go
wagon127 Posted January 6, 2020 Posted January 6, 2020 (edited) 11 hours ago, bmur66 said: Giving up that first down on 3rd and 18 was wayyy bad regardless of what the clock said Unless the entire defense saw it at zero, and let up the intensity thinking the play wasn't going to count. By then it was too late. Edited January 6, 2020 by wagon127
atlbillsfan1975 Posted January 6, 2020 Posted January 6, 2020 On 1/4/2020 at 8:34 PM, row_33 said: The TV screen is not the official clock the TV screen is often wrong You are wrong.
Call_Of_Ktulu Posted January 6, 2020 Posted January 6, 2020 1 hour ago, wagon127 said: Unless the entire defense saw it at zero, and let up the intensity thinking the play wasn't going to count. By then it was too late. This is what I think happened. It looked like they were surprised that the play was even allowed to go off. There 100% should’ve been a flag or a replay of the down. Most of the defense reacted late, horrible miss by the officials. 1
Bigmanbills88 Posted January 6, 2020 Posted January 6, 2020 On 1/4/2020 at 8:26 PM, Bandito said: https://twitter.com/claytravis/status/1213630554433839104?s=21 Tv play clock and actual play clock the officials use are not always identical
Bookie Man Posted January 6, 2020 Posted January 6, 2020 I didn't think so at first, but after rewatching the game, it was quite unbalanced as far as officiating goes. Texans OL and DB's were allowed to be more physical, more holdy and grabby. While Bills were hit with very ticky tacky calls. Texans seemed to be given the benefit of the doubt most of day.
Recommended Posts