DuckyBoys Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 Just now, NoSaint said: It doesn’t matter much but I’ll keep saying playing our 6th lineman on those plays is better That works too That is basically what Lee Smith is anyways Anything to get the play book completely usable
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 4 minutes ago, Mark Vader said: If that's the case, does that make McKenzie our returner? I would assume or Hyde
DuckyBoys Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 3 minutes ago, Limeaid said: His hands HAVE improved since he came to the Bills so maybe. dont trust him at all as a returner 1
Call_Of_Ktulu Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 25 minutes ago, Agent 91 said: According to the pic is Sweeney suiting up too? Why is the Lee Smith charade still going on Ideally I would like to have two TE's like Knox and one blocking TE like Smith. I just want a different blocking TE, Smith takes way to many critical penalties.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 ...not much game film on Duke so let 'em guess......not fast but a beast after the ball......Smoke and Beasley will provide the speed.......gimme some Knox and Beasley underneath and/or in the seam......keep 'rm honest with Singeltary and Yeldon (no offense Frank).....
Mark Vader Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 2 minutes ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said: I would assume or Hyde I hope not. I don't want one of our starting defenders doing returns.
Coach Tuesday Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 4 minutes ago, NoSaint said: It doesn’t matter much but I’ll keep saying playing our 6th lineman on those plays is better Too much of a tell. At least Smith could catch passes in theory...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 Looks like the unofficial inactives are: Roberts, Wallace, Sweeney, Bates, Boettger, Yeldon, Taylor
Saxum Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 5 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said: Too much of a tell. At least Smith could catch passes in theory... Yeah he made enough as Raider that if the defenders are cheating away from them he can hurt them.
Scott7975 Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 1 minute ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said: Looks like the unofficial inactives are: Roberts, Wallace, Sweeney, Bates, Boettger, Yeldon, Taylor I cant really see Wallace inactive. He may not play but they need some depth there.
Not at the table Karlos Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 36 minutes ago, Agent 91 said: According to the pic is Sweeney suiting up too? Why is the Lee Smith charade still going on With Watt coming back and Ford having an up and down year smith is going to be needed 1
Virgil Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 I honestly hope Foster suits up and McKenzie is inactive. Foster can execute the jet sweep and is better on ST 1
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 3 minutes ago, Scott7975 said: I cant really see Wallace inactive. He may not play but they need some depth there. According to Joe B Marlowe not out with the inactives 1
Scott7975 Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 Just now, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said: According to Joe B Marlowe not out with the inactives Ah, didn't hear that one
GunnerBill Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 20 minutes ago, LABILLBACKER said: Beasley should never line up wide. He's 5-8 so he's too short for any jump balls and not fast enough for go routes. He should be a slot guy exclusively doing curls and slants. That's his strength. I agree. I was just talking about what he has been doing. As I said it is more than I expected. 24 minutes ago, Scott7975 said: I can honestly say that I don't pay that much attention to detail as you awesome guys do... but that would make sense in a 2 WR set. He IS our second best receiver. I asked in pre-season who would be opposite Brown in 2 wide formations and I was adamant it wouldn't be Beasley but he has done it some. More than I expected.
atlbillsfan1975 Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 23 minutes ago, Mark Vader said: If that's the case, does that make McKenzie our returner? That’s a little scary. 1
Beast Posted January 4, 2020 Posted January 4, 2020 7 minutes ago, Virgil said: I honestly hope Foster suits up and McKenzie is inactive. Foster can execute the jet sweep and is better on ST Why would anyone hope for that? McKenzie has at least shown to be useful. Robert Foster has done nothing all year long. 2
Recommended Posts