Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This shouldn’t be a surprise, there was an article a few weeks ago that said they keep Tre on the same side of the field. I do tend to agree with you though, why let the offense dictate the matchups? I assume it allows our defense to communicate better, play faster, and not be out of position on the snap. I would think the trade-off wouldn’t be worth it if Fuller is out and Hopkins abuses Wallace.

Posted

None of what was said matters at this point. I dont expect nor want public game plan honesty plus adjustments get made during the game so how things start out dont mean everything either.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hebert19 said:

Gamesmanship.  He will most plays

This^^^ seems like a great way to get into a player/teams head a little. No way Tre is exposing the game plan in this locker room.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Virgil said:

https://buffalonews.com/2020/01/02/buffalo-bills-houston-texans-tredavious-white-deandre-hopkins/

 

I think this is beyond stupid, especially if Fuller doesn't play.  There's no reason for him to cover anyone else

I think he will be covering Hopkins at least 90% of the time, if not more. Yeah I wouldn't read too much into it. If for some odd reason he isn't covering Hopkins for a majority of the game, then yeah I agree that would be pretty silly.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Virgil said:

https://buffalonews.com/2020/01/02/buffalo-bills-houston-texans-tredavious-white-deandre-hopkins/

 

I think this is beyond stupid, especially if Fuller doesn't play.  There's no reason for him to cover anyone else

 

It's not a secret that the Bills play zone most of the time, although at times they Man Up to put more pressure on the QB and play the run.

Tre' has no reason to divulge the Bills defensive plans.

Posted

Tre could say that they are going to put Milano on Hopkins and it wouldn’t make an iota of difference at this point. No player is going to fully divulge a game plan.

Posted
36 minutes ago, Troll Toll said:

This shouldn’t be a surprise, there was an article a few weeks ago that said they keep Tre on the same side of the field. I do tend to agree with you though, why let the offense dictate the matchups? I assume it allows our defense to communicate better, play faster, and not be out of position on the snap. I would think the trade-off wouldn’t be worth it if Fuller is out and Hopkins abuses Wallace.

 

I prefer the Shadow version when there is one receiver way better than the others, but Sherman in Seattle also did half the field and it allowed the rest of the defense to play predictably and consistently and not let the opposing OC manipulate with formation and motion.

 

I love Tre, but I love our secondary as a whole and think we are more than a shutdown corner. But also what has been stated or implied and what will happen should not be related.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Troll Toll said:

This shouldn’t be a surprise, there was an article a few weeks ago that said they keep Tre on the same side of the field. I do tend to agree with you though, why let the offense dictate the matchups? I assume it allows our defense to communicate better, play faster, and not be out of position on the snap. I would think the trade-off wouldn’t be worth it if Fuller is out and Hopkins abuses Wallace.

It's called zone coverage. That's our primary defense. But in certain circumstances Tre White shadows the best receiver.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Giuseppe Tognarelli said:

The biggest news here, IMO, is that White says "Kevin" will be on the other side. That right there tells you they're not expecting Wallace to play.

 

Or maybe because Kevin has been starting a lot of the games since midseason?

Posted
1 hour ago, Sig1Hunter said:

What’s stupid is revealing your strategy before the game...unless there is a reason to...

 

I don't think this is a ruse.  Tre did the same thing against the Pats and Edelman feasted on them whenever Tre wasn't in coverage

×
×
  • Create New...