Jump to content

Who would you rather have   

311 members have voted

  1. 1. This Saturday: If you had the choice of either QB, who would you want leading your team

    • Josh Allen
      158
    • Deshaun Watson
      153


Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, JayBaller10 said:

Allen was 24/46 for 264 with a 5.7 average 0 TDs and a 69.5 rating against one of the worst pass defenses in the NFL. 
Watson was 20/25 for 247 with a 9.9 average, 1 TD and a 121.2 rating against one of the best pass defenses in the NFL. 
Is this thread still a thing?


Majbobby would call those very similar. Allen more completions and yards, and only 1 less TD!

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, ToGoGo said:

We had him on the ropes. I always liked Watson, and he definitely has intangibles, but I still like Allen's ceiling more. Watson has incredible weapons to throw to. We should've won. 

Ceiling? What does that even mean? Ceiling is nothing more than a hypothetical...what did people think Tom Brady’s ceiling was when he came out? It’s a word that everyone throws around but means absolutely nothing...all ceiling is is whatever you want it to be...

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, JaCrispy said:

Ceiling? What does that even mean? Ceiling is nothing more than a hypothetical...what did people think Tom Brady’s ceiling was when he came out? It’s a word that everyone throws around but means absolutely nothing...all ceiling is is whatever you want it to be...

 

Couldn't disagree more.

 

Brady was an outlier, and with some shady stuff around it too I might add. 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, ToGoGo said:

 

Couldn't disagree more.

 

Brady was an outlier, and with some shady stuff around it too I might add. 

Then what and who determines one’s ceiling? It’s completely subjective...there were people thought Josh was a bust...clearly they didn’t think his ceiling was high...who’s the judge?

Edited by JaCrispy
Posted
1 minute ago, JaCrispy said:

Then what and who determines one’s ceiling? It’s completely subjective...there were people thought Josh was a bust...clearly they didn’t think his ceiling was high...who’s the judge?

 

If you're looking for an objective answer to a subjective concept, that's what I call a dead end. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Not sure by 30.... but I agree we swap the QBs and the Bills definitely win. 

 

Deshaun Watson is a star in the NFL.

 

Swap him with a below average QB like Allen and win in a blowout. 

Posted
1 minute ago, ToGoGo said:

 

If you're looking for an objective answer to a subjective concept, that's what I call a dead end. 

Thank you for making my point...

Posted
1 minute ago, JaCrispy said:

Thank you for making my point...

 

What are you arguing? I said that I thought his ceiling was higher than Watson's. That is my subjective opinion that started this debate. 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, ToGoGo said:

 

What are you arguing? I said that I thought his ceiling was higher than Watson's. That is my subjective opinion that started this debate. 

And my point was that it means nothing...I could say I think Matt Barkley’s ceiling is higher than Watson’s...who cares??

 

Josh Allen might never get any better the rest of his career...who cares what anyone thinks of his hypothetical ceiling...it’s all about how good you are now...

 

 

Edited by JaCrispy
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

And my point was that it means nothing...I could say I think Matt Barkley’s ceiling is higher than Watson’s...who cares??

 

Josh Allen might never get any better the rest of his career...who cares what anyone thinks of his hypothetical ceiling...it’s all about how good you are now...

 

 

 

Are you saying that I should keep my subjective opinion to myself because "who cares"? 

 

Whatever man, I don't think you even know the purpose of what you're saying. 

Posted
12 hours ago, thebandit27 said:


https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/passing_advanced.htm

 

There’s a fair bit that you’re leaving out:

 

That apparently huge difference between 9 and 20 in on-target percentage amounts to 3%. Not exactly the chasm you’re implying.

 

Same goes for bad throw percentage; the difference is 4%.

 

The difference in CAY/PA is half a yard.

 

Now for the stuff that you didn’t mention:

 

Allen suffered a drop rate of 7.2%—highest in the NFL. Watson’s was 4.4%. WR play matters.
 

Both QBs faced the same number of hurried despite Watson having more attempts; Allen was also hit 4 more times. OL play matters.

 

Even though their respective efficiencies on RPOs are very similar, Josh had less than half of Watson’s combined run/pass attempts from RPO plays. Play calling matters.


I find it rather interesting that you left out a significant measure of context after calling me out for cherry picking/obfuscating (actually it was for being “strawmanny” earlier in this thread (and it was in a different thread).


His NFL track record?

 

Not really. He has one playoff win over the Connor Cook lead Raiders.

 

I like Watson, but let’s be accurate.

Haha....Yeah, its time to rethink that one.....its not even close....Allen made bad play after bad play.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, Jaywrizzo said:

Haha....Yeah, its time to rethink that one.....its not even close....Allen made bad play after bad play.

 

Until he didn't and kept us in the game.

 

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, ToGoGo said:

 

Are you saying that I should keep my subjective opinion to myself because "who cares"? 

 

Whatever man, I don't think you even know the purpose of what you're saying. 

You’re probably right...In that case, I think Allen’s ceiling is higher than Mahomes...carry on ?

Edited by JaCrispy
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

Until he didn't and kept us in the game.

 


don’t go down with the ship on defending Allen’s second half. 
 

plenty of promising items from the season to latch onto if you want to but that’s 20 or so minutes you box up, bury and pretend never happened.

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 hour ago, JayBaller10 said:

Allen was 24/46 for 264 with a 5.7 average 0 TDs and a 69.5 rating against one of the worst pass defenses in the NFL. 
Watson was 20/25 for 247 with a 9.9 average, 1 TD and a 121.2 rating against one of the best pass defenses in the NFL. 
Is this thread still a thing?

^This.

It isn't even a close call. Watson has now been a Top 10 QB in the NFL in each of his first 3 seasons. It doesn't matter if Allen has "potential." Watson is a winner, and he just won. Again.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Jaywrizzo said:

Haha....Yeah, its time to rethink that one.....its not even close....Allen made bad play after bad play.


maybe it’s time to read the thread before you say silly things 

Posted

Watson proved today he is indeed the better QB.  Allen got very lucky and should have been intercepted at least twice, one for a pick 6.

Allen is a gamer who made many mistakes today.,  He'll learn, but he is what he is.

×
×
  • Create New...