Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, ProcessTruster said:

yeah Duke is nothing but a slower, bigger pass catcher who can't yet do anything else..  With limited roster sizes,  If you are not a top 2 wideout or a top 2 DB , on most teams you better be a strong blocker or strong on special teams, neither of which Duke is remotely close to being.   Playoff football is field position football, and what I see is we have a somewhat limited, but improving talent and therefore (IMO) field position management team, and special teams is all about gaining field position advantage.   If a team like the Bills just rolls out anyone on ST they will lose the special teams field position battle and be at a bigger disadvantage  than super talented teams that can just still score a bunch of points regardless of field position.. Bills obviously do not yet have the roster on offense to do that.  just my view

 

In fairness Duke's run blocking overall has been pretty decent when he has been on the field despite a couple of whiffs on Sunday. Otherwise I agree with everything you posted above. 

 

I wonder if people actually watch the Bills and really understand what their plan is?

 

The Bills win on defense by not giving up big plays and by making teams put together 8-12 play drives to score. Make one mistake in there and get yourself behind the chains and the Bills defense almost always gets you off the field. That has to be allied with a special teams unit that at the very least holds its own in the field position game. Make teams start drives against you from their 30 at best. If you have a couple of special teams breakdowns that give your opponent, in this case Deshaun Watson and the Texans, starts at midfield it undermines your whole defensive gameplan. 

 

The Bills are not going to risk that for a marginal talent at wide receiver. I still say the route to get Duke active if that is the way they decide to go is at the expense of a tight end. 

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted

Interesting how The Athletic points out all the deficiencies for Duke (running route short, 2 drops, missed block) and then states that he should play.

 

Duke's blocking is often cited on this board as an additional reason to play him. 

 

Prediction: Duke WIlliams doesn't make the team in 2020. I think they will sign a WR in free agency and draft 2, 1 in first or second round and one in late rounds because the position is stacked in the draft. If they keep 6 WRs they will be:

 

Brown

Beasley

Free agent WR

1st or 2nd round draft pick

Roberts (for return game)

McKenzie or late round pick

 

Duke will follow in the great TBD Stadium Wall tradition of Brandon Reilly, Da'Rick Rogers and Naaman Roosevelt and drift into oblivion after the board clamoring for more snaps. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
7 hours ago, oldschoolfootball1963 said:

Just confirming what we already know. Not only should Duke be starting but Sweeney should be in there with knox when the Bills go to 2 TE sets. Also put Singletary and Yeldon on the field at the same time. This is so easy to see. Maybe our coaching staff will wise up. We need points not a fullback or TE that just blocks.  Sean McDermott  started Peterman out of the blue against the Chargers 2 years ago and benched Tyrod. Maybe lighting will strike twice. We need to score, wtf is wrong with the Bills flood the field with your best weapons and let’s attack. 

We are a running team first ,  # 8 in rushing that’s why we have a fullback & TE who blocks , 

Posted
2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

In fairness Duke's run blocking overall has been pretty decent when he has been on the field despite a couple of whiffs on Sunday. Otherwise I agree with everything you posted above. 

 

I wonder if people actually watch the Bills and really understand what their plan is?

 

The Bills win on defense by not giving up big plays and by making teams put together 8-12 play drives to score. Make one mistake in there and get yourself behind the chains and the Bills defense almost always gets you off the field. That has to be allied with a special teams unit that at the very least holds its own in the field position game. Make teams start drives against you from their 30 at best. If you have a couple of special teams breakdowns that give your opponent, in this case Deshaun Watson and the Texans, starts at midfield it undermines your whole defensive gameplan. 

 

The Bills are not going to risk that for a marginal talent at wide receiver. I still say the route to get Duke active if that is the way they decide to go is at the expense of a tight end. 

To your second line above, my sense is that many who watch the Bills intently desperately want them to be like the Chiefs, Saints, the popular entertaining offensive teams.   The cool kids of the league with the shiny toys and the goats.   That's fine, but McD is working to win games, and trying to imitate the cool kids and throw it all over the place with a 2nd tier offensive roster will lose you more games than it will win.   Bills-style football(this year) is pretty boring, lunch pail, field position, stay in the game stuff,  in comparison to the other top 10 teams.   and I'm a fan.   but it works.  the media ignore it, bc there are no splash plays or players to sell advertising off of.   but it works.   Trust the Process; barring a pile of injuries,  my sense is McBeanes will ultimately prevail over time.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
56 minutes ago, jwhit34 said:

Interesting how The Athletic points out all the deficiencies for Duke (running route short, 2 drops, missed block) and then states that he should play.

 

Duke's blocking is often cited on this board as an additional reason to play him. 

 

Prediction: Duke WIlliams doesn't make the team in 2020. I think they will sign a WR in free agency and draft 2, 1 in first or second round and one in late rounds because the position is stacked in the draft. If they keep 6 WRs they will be:

 

Brown

Beasley

Free agent WR

1st or 2nd round draft pick

Roberts (for return game)

McKenzie or late round pick

 

Duke will follow in the great TBD Stadium Wall tradition of Brandon Reilly, Da'Rick Rogers and Naaman Roosevelt and drift into oblivion after the board clamoring for more snaps. 

Not really that interesting if you keep reading. 

 

It's basically the lesser of two evils. 

 

Duke has problems with his game but fosters are worse and since the deep ball hasn't been there this season he's not looking very good as a receiver either. 

Edited by The Wiz
Posted

Go look at the snap counts for offense and more importantly special teams and tell me Foster, Roberts, Dimarco and Perry are all irreplacable    I can guarantee you all 4 are worthless on offense  If only McKenzie could hold onto returns we wouldn't be wasting a wr spot for Roberts

Posted
2 hours ago, jwhit34 said:

Interesting how The Athletic points out all the deficiencies for Duke (running route short, 2 drops, missed block) and then states that he should play.

 

Duke's blocking is often cited on this board as an additional reason to play him. 

 

Prediction: Duke WIlliams doesn't make the team in 2020. I think they will sign a WR in free agency and draft 2, 1 in first or second round and one in late rounds because the position is stacked in the draft. If they keep 6 WRs they will be:

 

Brown

Beasley

Free agent WR

1st or 2nd round draft pick

Roberts (for return game)

McKenzie or late round pick

 

Duke will follow in the great TBD Stadium Wall tradition of Brandon Reilly, Da'Rick Rogers and Naaman Roosevelt and drift into oblivion after the board clamoring for more snaps. 

I agree with all but Roberts, I like him but he is a waste of a roster spot. No kickoffs should ever be returned from the end zone and all you need is sure hands for punts. If he can't be a contributing part of an anemic offense why keep him?

 

Posted (edited)

So this week. 
 

Levi Wallace inactive (INJ) - Duke Williams activated 

 

Could easily deactivate Perry - Yeldon Activated 

Foster stays active like he has been. 
 

Could easily Deactivate Kroft - Sweeney Activated 

 

 

now that said that it won’t happen except likely Duke Williams being activated 

5 minutes ago, 298Woody said:

I agree with all but Roberts, I like him but he is a waste of a roster spot. No kickoffs should ever be returned from the end zone and all you need is sure hands for punts. If he can't be a contributing part of an anemic offense why keep him?

 


he has given more yards than a TB. He also is top 5 in KR and top 10 in PR. Yeah let’s take that production off the field. 

Edited by MAJBobby
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

So this week. 
 

Levi Wallace inactive (INJ) - Duke Williams activated 

 

Could easily deactivate Perry - Yeldon Activated 

Foster stays active like he has been. 
 

Could easily Deactivate Kroft - Sweeney Activated 

 

 

no said that it won’t happen except likely Duke Williams being activated 


he has given more yards than a TB. He also is top 5 in KR and top 10 in PR. Yeah let’s take that production off the field. 

I said I like him but kick returns are less and for every return out of the end zone 25 yards should be subtracted. I don't think a kick should ever be returned from the end zone because the risk of penalty and injury added to getting to the 25 yard line isn't worth the gamble so it reduces the value of the position. Punt returns are another matter and he is the best returner in a long long time. He also is getting old and missed games this year. My only point is game day roster positions on a under performing office are valuable.

Posted
25 minutes ago, 298Woody said:

I said I like him but kick returns are less and for every return out of the end zone 25 yards should be subtracted. I don't think a kick should ever be returned from the end zone because the risk of penalty and injury added to getting to the 25 yard line isn't worth the gamble so it reduces the value of the position. Punt returns are another matter and he is the best returner in a long long time. He also is getting old and missed games this year. My only point is game day roster positions on a under performing office are valuable.


Stats have shown this to be wrong. There are just as many kick returns this year than those in the past. Also Texans ST are very good so doesn’t make sense taking off one of our best ST weapons. 
 

so let’s say you lose his Return yards because of Hyde just catching the Punt. You don’t think those extra yards Help an offense?

Posted
5 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

I still say the route to get Duke active if that is the way they decide to go is at the expense of a tight end. 

 

I agree with Joe Marino's take - inactivate Kurt Coleman for Duke Williams. His special teams snaps have declined since the beginning of the year and he was terrible against the Jets. It is useless to keep him active over a receiver that offers something different on offense.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Well the coaching staff will surly have a long conversation about activating him after a 100 yard game with a 2nd QB against a good defense. 

 

I trust whatever decision they make... 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Duke gives the Bills a dimension they don't have, a big, physical receiver who can catch 50/50 balls.  They're gonna need it going against Houston's secondary.  Duke should be active, but I don't think McD is going to do it, even though it goes against the "ya gotta earn it" mantra.  McD just has a massive woody for Foster.

Posted
1 minute ago, Freddie's Dead said:

Duke gives the Bills a dimension they don't have, a big, physical receiver who can catch 50/50 balls.  They're gonna need it going against Houston's secondary.  Duke should be active, but I don't think McD is going to do it, even though it goes against the "ya gotta earn it" mantra.  McD just has a massive woody for Foster.


houstons secondary is exposed by speed. Has been all year. My prediction BOTH Foster and Williams will be active. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
9 hours ago, mykidsdad said:

Poor specilal teams plus poor execution on blockingassignment equals more bench time. Love William's for the future, but he either breaks into the top 3 WR or he becomes a better special teamer.

Or we do what most teams do with their #3 wr. Not play him on ST. There, problem solved. Let Kevin, Taron and Perry cover fair catches & touchbacks. This ST argument for benching Duke is so incredibly lame.

  • Like (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...