Jump to content

Injuries to starters on Sunday  

99 members have voted

  1. 1. will be blamed on...

    • McDermott
      44
    • Part of the game/unavoidable
      55


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Binghamton Beast said:

 

No, there isn't. At all. 
 

Why don't you list for me every player, and the positions they will play throughout the game, and do not include any starters in it.

 

Don't forget to include Special Teams, Nickle and Dime packages, Short yardage formations, etc, and, like I said, include substitution for tired players.

 

Simply put, it can't be done. To even insinuate that no starters should play is ignorant to what goes during the game.

You know that’s not what anyone’s saying. Every starter of the 22 guys on offense and defense is what we are talking about. Which is why I have said any starter that matters several times. And there are enough guys to do that.

Edited by Brianmoorman4jesus
Posted

FFS you can't sit all the starters.  There are only 9 OL and 5 LBs.

Take 4 away from the DL and the other 5 have to play the full game with one substitution?

 

Let McDermott do what he is going to do.  The depth will play a lot more snaps and some starting vets won't play but 

a few snaps.

 

LOL, "nothing exceeds like excess" on this board sometimes.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:

You know that’s not what anyone’s saying. Every starter of the 22 guys on offense and defense is what we are talking about. Which is why I have said any starter that matters several times. And there are enough guys to do that.


There are NOT enough guys to do this. My god.....it has NEVER happened.  Even in the Bills hay day, they rested a handful of guys and that was it because there are not enough players on an active roster to rest 22 players.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:

I just don’t think our offense is strong enough to skip a week.  I would play the starters for at least a half.

But then who plays the second half? You can only have so many active players. I would activate 5 to 6 people on offense and 5 to 6 on defense mainly the ones I listed above. It is pure lunacy to put a couple of your main starters on the field for a couple of series. That is pure coach speak bs that somehow this one week of prep is going to give them that extra training they need for he playoffs. There is zero evidence to support that this is somehow going to make everything better in the playoff game. And if they are calling a vanilla gameplan anyways and don’t do well is that going to decrease their confidence for next week? You don’t risk playing your top talent, it’s just stupid. 

Posted

the obvious choice is obvious.

 

these are not seasoned vets. they are a young inexperienced team that needs all the experience and momentum they can get going into the postseason.

 

that said, the risk of injury is there in this game as it is in any game that they play. no HC should be the blame of injury from a game these young men are paid to play. I support his decision to play the starters.

 

 

 

Posted

Oh.  It will be blamed on McDermott.  If White gets significantly injured against the Jets and then Hopkins has a monster game to beat us fans won't be forgiving.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Rocbillsfan1 said:

But then who plays the second half? You can only have so many active players. I would activate 5 to 6 people on offense and 5 to 6 on defense mainly the ones I listed above. It is pure lunacy to put a couple of your main starters on the field for a couple of series. That is pure coach speak bs that somehow this one week of prep is going to give them that extra training they need for he playoffs. There is zero evidence to support that this is somehow going to make everything better in the playoff game. And if they are calling a vanilla gameplan anyways and don’t do well is that going to decrease their confidence for next week? You don’t risk playing your top talent, it’s just stupid. 


New England plays their players even when they clinch....

Posted

You can’t be scared.  The pats would play 80 year old Brady in a meaningless week 17 game. Allen and the offense could use the work.  It’s kinda amazing how healthy they have been (knocking on wood).  Can’t fault anyone if something fluky happens.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:


New England plays their players even when they clinch....

Maybe they are playing for a 1 or 2 seed which means a bye and home playoffs games but I would love an example when there is no meaning to the outcome that they left Brady to play a whole game. 

Just now, C.Biscuit97 said:

You can’t be scared.  The pats would play 80 year old Brady in a meaningless week 17 game. Allen and the offense could use the work.  It’s kinda amazing how healthy they have been (knocking on wood).  Can’t fault anyone if something fluky happens.  

Yes you can it’s called the coach. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:


New England plays their players even when they clinch....


they have something to play for.   A loss and a win by KC puts them at #3.  That’s practically a wild card spot. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, BillsfaninSB said:


they have something to play for.   A loss and a win by KC puts them at #3.  That’s practically a wild card spot. 

They do it even when they have the one seed clinched.  

Posted
2 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said:


New England plays their players even when they clinch....

 

1 hour ago, C.Biscuit97 said:

They do it even when they have the one seed clinched.  

 

New England's opponents are also not allowed to hit New England players.

Posted
9 hours ago, Binghamton Beast said:

 

No, there isn't. At all. 
 

Why don't you list for me every player, and the positions they will play throughout the game, and do not include any starters in it.

 

Don't forget to include Special Teams, Nickle and Dime packages, Short yardage formations, etc, and, like I said, include substitution for tired players.

 

Simply put, it can't be done. To even insinuate that no starters should play is ignorant to what goes during the game.

Offense

5

22/20/32

82

16

18-slot

77 they split neither is a starter

71

61 

65

70 they split neither is a starter

89

85 2 TE sets

 

defense 

92

96

94

90 or 93 whichever you consider 

51

52

57- in 4-3

29

33

28

31

46 in nickel move 33 inside 


I don’t want them to literally bench every starter. I want the 10-15 guys that we absolutely need in the playoffs to sit in a meaningless game. And there are things you can do to add a guy from the ps here and there to actually do this if it was necessary. I just wanted to put it out there that on a technicality with the RT situation it could be done. Even though I really was talking about all the main players. The only actual starting spot of the 22 where you would run into a numbers issue would be that other tackle. It wasn’t really a big deal I just couldn’t not answer or try to do it when you asked.

×
×
  • Create New...