Buffalo_Gal Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 The pee-pee dossier was based on a joke made in a bar. And, Lindsey wants Carter Page to sue the FBI and CIA. LOL He's mentioning how they lied to get the FISA warrants. 3
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 Breitbart uploaded Horowitz's opening statement. And Lindsey just mentioned he's not certain whether the FISC can continue without real changes. 2
Foxx Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 Feinstein being disingenuous. "...there is no deep state..." 3
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 Dianne Feinstein - she's going to go with the "no evidence of anti-Trump bias". She has to. It is all she's got to make this less horrifying. She's never going to explain that they (the OIG) needed someone to confess to it being politically motivating in order for that conclusion to be drawn by the report. I wonder who will ask Horowitz to explain this? 2
Nanker Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Foxx said: Feinstein being disingenuous. "...there is no deep state..." That’s what her Chinese driver(handler) for 25 years told her to say. 1 2
Cinga Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Breitbart uploaded Horowitz's opening statement. And Lindsey just mentioned he's not certain whether the FISC can continue without real changes. Yeah, like shutting it down permanently. To assume a secret court will not be abused is pure fantasy 3 1
Foxx Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: Dianne Feinstein - she's going to go with the "no evidence of anti-Trump bias". She has to. It is all she's got to make this less horrifying. She's never going to explain that they (the OIG) needed someone to confess to it being politically motivating in order for that conclusion to be drawn by the report. I wonder who will ask Horowitz to explain this? someone better ask him to explain that. however, i won't be surprised if no one does. 1
BillsFanNC Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 No political or anti Trump bias. Ok. Then there must have been a lot of people at the FBI who were really, really pissed at Carter Page for some reason. 1
Foxx Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 (edited) Horowitz giving his statement now. Edited December 11, 2019 by Foxx
Tiberius Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said: No political or anti Trump bias. Ok. Then there must have been a lot of people at the FBI who were really, really pissed at Carter Page for some reason. Or maybe they just saw the obvious
B-Man Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 44 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: heh... is Di-Fi breathing next to Graham? I didn't see a reaction there. 1
Foxx Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 (edited) paraphrasing.. 'we determined that the FBI properly opened an investigation known as 'Crossfire Hurricane. said decision is also discretionary and within department discretion'. Edited December 11, 2019 by Foxx
SoCal Deek Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 8 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Dianne Feinstein - she's going to go with the "no evidence of anti-Trump bias". She has to. It is all she's got to make this less horrifying. She's never going to explain that they (the OIG) needed someone to confess to it being politically motivating in order for that conclusion to be drawn by the report. I wonder who will ask Horowitz to explain this? How could the text messages between Struck and Page be interpreted as anything other than political bias? 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 I foresee sweeping FBI policy changes. 2
B-Man Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 He just said something I hadn’t heard before, that he did not find political bias for opening the CH investigation, a decision that was made by Bill Priestap, Strozk’s boss. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything that says Priestap was politically biased. He was the boss of people who were, but who hasn’t presented something to their boss without fully disclosing their own thoughts about it? “Documentary or Testimonial Evidence” means no one we talked to admitted to it, provided any written proof of it, or was willing to testify that someone else did it. 2 2
BillsFanNC Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 5 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: How could the text messages between Struck and Page be interpreted as anything other than political bias? They cant. But since none of these cast of characters at the FBI were stupid enough to voice or write down their bias during the course of their official FBI duties relating to this matter, and none were stupid enough to admit to it when interviewed by the OIG...then Horowitz has the cover to "correctly" say that they found no evidence of political bias in the course of their investigation. 1
Foxx Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 a complete break down at the top of the chain of command. 3
Recommended Posts