Deranged Rhino Posted December 11, 2019 Author Posted December 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Hirono really is an idiot. I'm sure one of the other senators will address this after she's done -- but when she mentioned OIG couldn't compel testimony, and had Horowitz say he only had two people he could not compel (Simpson and Winer), she's KNOWINGLY (or would be knowingly if she wasn't dim as a busted bulb) omitting that he can only interview ACTIVE FBI/DOJ personnel. So there's MUCH more than 2 people he could not interview. Brennan and Clapper are two that spring to mind. 2
Cinga Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Hirono really is an idiot. She is so stupid it hurts my head! 4
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 Clinesmith was the only criminal referral off this report. They ended up sending the whole report over for more criminal referrals (Horowitz claiming he knows of no more referrals or firings). *** Horowitz wants to make sure misconduct, performance failures (Ernst points out lies) ... those people in the FBI are gone.
Warren Zevon Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 53 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: He needs to start thinking for himself. It would save him years of being embarrassed down here. He said something didn't happen, asked me to link it. I did, and proved him wrong So there were 5 criminal referrals? You're a moron.
Deranged Rhino Posted December 11, 2019 Author Posted December 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Clinesmith was the only criminal referral off this report. They ended up sending the whole report over for more criminal referrals (Horowitz claiming he knows of no more referrals or firings). What he meant: He left it up to Barr, because of their conversations during the review process. He didn't want to make the determination himself because Barr was telling him there's more that he does not know, so he submitted the entire report and everyone who worked the case to the FBI and AG. More simply: They ALL are being considered for criminal indictments. Get your popcorn. Gary rushes in thinking he's right again... he's wrong 2
Warren Zevon Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Brennan and Clapper are two that spring to mind. "Indicted by the fall" - Derrrrrrrrranged Mammal
Deranged Rhino Posted December 11, 2019 Author Posted December 11, 2019 When you get proven wrong, twice in one morning, all you have left to do is scream into the wind and invent things I never said. Never change, Gar. You lovable asshat. 2
Foxx Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 surprise surprise... Kamala off the reservation. 1 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 Kamala showed up. She's trying to disparage Barr and bringing up Russia! Russia! Russia! 2
Foxx Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 wtf are these idiot Dems doing trying to litigate impeachment in this hearing? Harris: why did you not investigate Guilani hello.............. 3
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 Kamala needs a voice coach, or a nose job. She sounds especially nasally today. 4
Albwan Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 (edited) Kamala is now going to be extra extra bitter Edited December 11, 2019 by Albwan
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 To determine bias they asked the people at the FBI if they were biased!? 1 3
SoCal Deek Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 6 minutes ago, Albwan said: Kamala is now going to be extra extra bitter Can she blame it all on racism? That usually works!
Uncle Joe Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 11 minutes ago, Foxx said: wtf are these idiot Dems doing trying to litigate impeachment in this hearing? Harris: why did you not investigate Guilani hello.............. Horse meet cart... 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 (edited) Crapo ... Referred for further action one case for criminal and how many other cases? Horowitz said (after a ton of back and forth) there are significant failures whether incompetence or intentional, what the motivations are ... I cannot tell you. Horowitz is NOT saying there is no bias. He'd be skeptical that there is no bias at all. Edited December 11, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 3 1
Deranged Rhino Posted December 11, 2019 Author Posted December 11, 2019 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Crapo ... Referred for further action one case for criminal and how many other cases? Horowitz said (after a ton of back and forth) there are significant failures whether incompetence or intentional, what the motivations are ... I cannot tell you. Horowitz is NOT saying there is no bias. He'd be skeptical that there is no bias at all. And he specifically says he WON'T say there was no bias in terms of the FISA abuses. All those people doing victory laps are in for a ROUGH time. VERY interesting to note that Horowitz just used the SAME language Barr used in his NBC interview re: the explanations for the actions being poor. 3 1
Foxx Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 (edited) did i miss Booker or is he not there? Edited December 11, 2019 by Foxx
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 11, 2019 Posted December 11, 2019 How was the pee-pee dossier deliver? Steele went to an agent, the agent at the FBI went to McCabe... (still under Crapo questioning) 2
Recommended Posts