Nanker Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 Called the FBI probe intrusive and exculpatory evidence not presented to FISA Court. 2
Tiberius Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Important to keep in mind: Illegal post dumb ass! See, DR is just a bot
John Adams Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 5 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Although not mentioned in the EC, at the time, FBI officials involved in opening the investigation had reason to believe that Russia may have been connected to the Wikileaks disclosures that occurred earlier in July 2016, and were aware of information regarding Russia's efforts to interfere with the 2016 U.S. elections. These officials, though, did not become aware of Steele's election reporting until weeks later and we therefore determined that Steele's reports played no role in the Crossfire Hurricane opening. Breaking news: Horowitz is part of the Deep State in 3...2...
Tiberius Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 4 minutes ago, Nanker said: Barr’s really on fire. And corrupt as hell
Deranged Rhino Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 6 minutes ago, snafu said: What, actually, is your objection to people posting tweets? Many times they contain links to either news articles or to source documents. Very often, tweets contain information that NOT being reported by the media. Other times (like with memes), when they don't they're just reflective of a point or opinion that someone wants to make. He's just a broken mind. Nothing more. 3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: link? 3
Tiberius Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 Just now, John Adams said: Breaking news: Horowitz is part of the Deep State in 3...2... That's funny! I dare you
DC Tom Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 Quote We concluded that the failures described above and in this report represent serious performance failures by the supervisory and non-supervisory agents with responsibility over the FISA applications. These failures prevented OI from fully performing its gatekeeper function and deprived the decision makers the opportunity to make fully informed decisions. Although some of the factual misstatements and omissions we found in this review were arguably more significant than others, we believe t hat all of them taken together resulted in FISA applications that made it appear that the information supporting probable cause was stronger than was actually the case. We identified at least 17 significant errors or omissions in the Carter Page FISA applications, and many additional errors in the Woods Procedures. These errors and omissions resulted from case agents providing wrong or incomplete information to OI and failing to flag important issues for discussion. While we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence of intentional misconduct on the part of the case agents who assisted OI in preparing the applications, or the agents and supervisors who performed the Woods Procedures, we also did not receive satisfactory explanations for the errors or problems we identified. In most instances, t he agents and supervisors told us that they either did not know or recall why the information was not shared with OI, that the failure to do so may have been an oversight, that they did not recognize at t he time the relevance of t he information to the FISA application, or that they did not believe the missing information to be significant . On this last point, we believe that case agents may have improperly substituted their own judgments in place of the judgment of OI, or in place of the court, to weigh the probative value of the information. Basically, a bunch of people ***** up, and engaged in wishful thinking. Whole lotta nothing.
3rdnlng Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 Once Admiral Rodgers dried up the ability for pre coup people to illegally obtain information by domestic spying the pre coup people went to the FISA court to get a warrant on Carter Page. It was turned down until they put the Dossier into the request. They then obtained a warrant. This was sworn to by Andy McCabe. 2 1
Tiberius Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 6 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: Although not mentioned in the EC, at the time, FBI officials involved in opening the investigation had reason to believe that Russia may have been connected to the Wikileaks disclosures that occurred earlier in July 2016, and were aware of information regarding Russia's efforts to interfere with the 2016 U.S. elections. These officials, though, did not become aware of Steele's election reporting until weeks later and we therefore determined that Steele's reports played no role in the Crossfire Hurricane opening. Bingo
Foxx Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 7 minutes ago, snafu said: What, actually, is your objection to people posting tweets? Many times they contain links to either news articles or to source documents. Very often, tweets contain information that NOT being reported by the media. Other times (like with memes), when they don't they're just reflective of a point or opinion that someone wants to make. .. he's broken. he wants to discourage the proliferation of information.
Tiberius Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: Basically, a bunch of people ***** up, and engaged in wishful thinking. Whole lotta nothing. But they knew a collusion with Russia when they saw it
John Adams Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Basically, a bunch of people ***** up, and engaged in wishful thinking. Whole lotta nothing. People sometimes are crappy at their jobs, even in government. And prison guards.
DC Tom Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: But they knew a collusion with Russia when they saw it Oh, shut the ***** up, you ***** dumbass. The report says they didn't even have enough suspicion of a Russian connection to investigate it. And you're still going to pretend "Russian collusion" is a fact? 3
3rdnlng Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 3 minutes ago, John Adams said: The occasional Tweet makes sense. Some posters spam the board with Tweets. "We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions to open the four individual investigations." Bad day for DR, but keep the narratives alive! Something awful might still happen to the country. Is that your informed opinion after reading and analyzing the nearly 500 page report? 1
Nanker Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: link? “Malfeasance detailed in IG Report reflects a clear abuse of FISA process.” 1
DC Tom Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 Just now, John Adams said: People sometimes are crappy at their jobs, even in government. And prison guards. Yes...but that's not going to stop me from spinning ridiculous conspiracy theories out of this one, too.
snafu Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 6 minutes ago, John Adams said: The occasional Tweet makes sense. Some posters spam the board with Tweets. "We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions to open the four individual investigations." Bad day for DR, but keep the narratives alive! Something awful might still happen to the country. I haven't had the chance to review the report yet. How many minutes ago was it released? Seems like you got to the nub of the conclusion pretty quickly. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: Is that your informed opinion after reading and analyzing the nearly 500 page report? Ask yourself -- or anyone who still bothers to pay attention to the nonsense JA writes -- if he's as objective as he claims, why is he rushing to spike the ball without reading the report. It's ***** damning and destroys the narrative that's been pumped into people's minds for two years. He's making definitive conclusions already -- why? Because he's broken. He's not honest, he doesn't care about finding truth -- he just wants his own opinions confirmed. He's an asshat. Not worth the time. Just now, snafu said: I haven't had the chance to review the report yet. How many minutes ago was it released? Seems like you got to the nub of the conclusion pretty quickly. No! He's an objective observer! He's not a programmed lemming.
Warren Zevon Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 Just now, snafu said: I haven't had the chance to review the report yet. How many minutes ago was it released? Seems like you got to the nub of the conclusion pretty quickly. It's in the first couple of pages of the report. I'm on page 6 - how about you?
Recommended Posts